IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v196y2012i1p167-18710.1007-s10479-012-1069-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of container inspection strategies considering multiple objectives via an evolutionary approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Concho
  • José Ramirez-Marquez

Abstract

The size and complexity of containerized shipping across the globe has increased the vulnerability of seaports to the attack of terrorist networks and contraband smuggling. As a result, the creation of inspection strategies to check incoming containers at ports-of-entry has been necessary to enable the detection of containers carrying prohibited items. However, since costs and tardiness considerations related to the inspection process prevent all cargo to be manually checked, including different non-intrusive screening technologies as part of the inspection strategies is essential to optimize inspection needs. In this paper, inspection strategies are represented as decision-tree structures where each node illustrates a screening device, and links represent the two possible classifications a screened container can get (i.e. suspicious or unsuspicious). Based on such classification, one of three actions is taken: to continue screening, release or physically check the container. The contribution of this paper is a mathematical framework that provides an approximation to the Pareto optimal solutions (i.e. inspection strategies) that enable decision-makers to: (1) identify tradeoffs among vulnerability, inspection cost, and tardiness for different inspection strategies, and based on this (2) find the strategy that best suits current inspection needs. The mathematical framework includes: (1) a multi-objective optimization model that concurrently minimizes vulnerability, cost, and tardiness while determining screening device allocation and threshold settings, as well as, (2) an evolutionary approach used to solve the optimization model. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Concho & José Ramirez-Marquez, 2012. "Optimal design of container inspection strategies considering multiple objectives via an evolutionary approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 167-187, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:196:y:2012:i:1:p:167-187:10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Rocco, Claudio M., 2008. "All-terminal network reliability optimization via probabilistic solution discovery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1689-1697.
    2. Concho, Ana Lisbeth & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2010. "An evolutionary algorithm for port-of-entry security optimization considering sensor thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 255-266.
    3. Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2009. "Stochastic network interdiction optimization via capacitated network reliability modeling and probabilistic solution discovery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 913-921.
    4. Lawrence M. Wein & Alex H. Wilkins & Manas Baveja & Stephen E. Flynn, 2006. "Preventing the Importation of Illicit Nuclear Materials in Shipping Containers," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1377-1393, October.
    5. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2008. "Port-of-entry safety via the reliability optimization of container inspection strategy through an evolutionary approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1698-1709.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuihua Han & Bin Cao & Yufang Fu & Zongwei Luo, 2018. "A liner shipping competitive model with consideration of service quality management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 155-177, November.
    2. Yongxi Cheng & Ding-Zhu Du & Feifeng Zheng, 2015. "A new strongly competitive group testing algorithm with small sequentiality," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 265-286, June.
    3. Sushil Gupta & Martin K. Starr & Reza Zanjirani Farahani & Mahsa Mahboob Ghodsi, 2020. "Prevention of Terrorism–An Assessment of Prior POM Work and Future Potentials," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1789-1815, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco, Claudio M. & Levitin, Gregory, 2011. "Optimal network protection against diverse interdictor strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 374-382.
    2. Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Li, Qing, 2018. "Locating and protecting facilities from intentional attacks using secrecyAuthor-Name: Zhang, Chi," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 51-62.
    3. Concho, Ana Lisbeth & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2010. "An evolutionary algorithm for port-of-entry security optimization considering sensor thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 255-266.
    4. Chi Zhang & Jose Ramirez-Marquez, 2013. "Protecting critical infrastructures against intentional attacks: a two-stage game with incomplete information," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 244-258.
    5. Zhu, Huaxing & Zhang, Chi, 2019. "Expanding a complex networked system for enhancing its reliability evaluated by a new efficient approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 205-220.
    6. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco S, Claudio M. & Levitin, Gregory, 2009. "Optimal protection of general source–sink networks via evolutionary techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1676-1684.
    7. Stuart Van Weele & Jose Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, 2012. "Optimization of inspection for dual contraband using a genetic algorithm," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(5), pages 508-525, October.
    8. Guozhen Xiong & Chi Zhang & Fei Zhou, 2017. "A robust reliability redundancy allocation problem under abnormal external failures guided by a new importance measure," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 180-199, April.
    9. Romero, Pablo & Graneri, Jorge & Viera, Omar & Moscatelli, Sandro & Tansini, Libertad, 2016. "A Multi-Tree Committee to assist port-of-entry inspection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 170-177.
    10. Yada Zhu & Mingyu Li & Christina Young & Minge Xie & Elsayed Elsayed, 2011. "Impact of measurement error on container inspection policies at port-of-entry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 23-43, July.
    11. Laura McLay & Jamie Lloyd & Emily Niman, 2011. "Interdicting nuclear material on cargo containers using knapsack problem models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 185-205, July.
    12. Li, Yulong & Lin, Jie & Zhang, Chi & Zhu, Huaxing & Zeng, Saixing & Sun, Chengshaung, 2022. "Joint optimization of structure and protection of interdependent infrastructure networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    13. Yan, Xihong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2016. "Optimal placement of multiple types of detectors under a small vessel attack threat to port security," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 71-94.
    14. Dreiding, Rebecca A. & McLay, Laura A., 2013. "An integrated model for screening cargo containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 181-189.
    15. McLay, Laura A. & Dreiding, Rebecca, 2012. "Multilevel, threshold-based policies for cargo container security screening systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 522-529.
    16. Zhang, Xiaoge & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Sankararaman, Shankar & Goebel, Kai, 2018. "Resilience-based network design under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 364-379.
    17. Yeh, Cheng-Ta, 2020. "A hybrid approach to solve a bi-objective optimization problem of a capacitated-flow network with a time factor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2009. "Stochastic network interdiction optimization via capacitated network reliability modeling and probabilistic solution discovery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 913-921.
    19. Zhang, Chi & Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Wang, Jianhui, 2015. "Critical infrastructure protection using secrecy – A discrete simultaneous game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 212-221.
    20. Pourakbar, M. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2018. "The role of customs in securing containerized global supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 331-340.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:196:y:2012:i:1:p:167-187:10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.