IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v229y2015i1p265-28610.1007-s10479-014-1766-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new strongly competitive group testing algorithm with small sequentiality

Author

Listed:
  • Yongxi Cheng
  • Ding-Zhu Du
  • Feifeng Zheng

Abstract

In many fault detection problems, we want to identify all defective items from a sample set of items using the minimum number of tests. Group testing is for the scenario where each test is performed on a subset of items, and tells whether the subset contains at least one defective item or not. In practice, the number of defective items in the sample set is usually unknown. In this paper, we investigate new algorithms for the group testing problem with unknown number of defective items. We consider the scenario where the performance of a group testing algorithm is measured by two criteria: the primary criterion is the number of tests performed, which measures the total cost spent; and the secondary criterion is the number of stages the algorithm works in, which is referred to as the sequentiality of the algorithm in this paper and measures the minimum amount of time required by using the algorithm to identify all the defective items. We present a new algorithm Recursive Binary Splitting (RBS) for the above group testing problem with unknown number of defective items, and prove an upper bound on the number of tests required by RBS. The computational results show that RBS exhibits very good practical performance, measured in terms of both the above two criteria. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Yongxi Cheng & Ding-Zhu Du & Feifeng Zheng, 2015. "A new strongly competitive group testing algorithm with small sequentiality," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 265-286, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:229:y:2015:i:1:p:265-286:10.1007/s10479-014-1766-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-014-1766-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-014-1766-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-014-1766-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claeys, Dieter & Walraevens, Joris & Laevens, Koenraad & Bruneel, Herwig, 2010. "A queueing model for general group screening policies and dynamic item arrivals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 827-835, December.
    2. Yongxi Cheng & Ding-Zhu Du & Yinfeng Xu, 2014. "A Zig-Zag Approach for Competitive Group Testing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 677-689, November.
    3. Ana Concho & José Ramirez-Marquez, 2012. "Optimal design of container inspection strategies considering multiple objectives via an evolutionary approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 167-187, July.
    4. Lawrence M. Wein & Stefanos A. Zenios, 1996. "Pooled Testing for HIV Screening: Capturing the Dilution Effect," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 543-569, August.
    5. Michael T. Goodrich & Daniel S. Hirschberg, 2008. "Improved adaptive group testing algorithms with applications to multiple access channels and dead sensor diagnosis," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 95-121, January.
    6. Bar-Lev, Shaul K. & Parlar, Mahmut & Perry, David & Stadje, Wolfgang & Van der Duyn Schouten, Frank A., 2007. "Applications of bulk queues to group testing models with incomplete identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 226-237, November.
    7. Lev Abolnikov & Alexander Dukhovny, 2003. "Optimization in HIV screening problems," International Journal of Stochastic Analysis, Hindawi, vol. 16, pages 1-14, January.
    8. Bar-Lev, S.K. & Parlar, M. & Perry, D. & Stadje, W. & van der Duyn Schouten, F.A., 2007. "Applications of bulk queues to group testing models with incomplete identification," Other publications TiSEM 0b1bfa5e-c1e6-43ec-9684-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Stuart Weele & Jose Ramirez-Marquez, 2011. "Optimization of container inspection strategy via a genetic algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 229-247, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongxi Cheng & Ding-Zhu Du & Yinfeng Xu, 2014. "A Zig-Zag Approach for Competitive Group Testing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 677-689, November.
    2. S. Pradhan & U. C. Gupta, 2019. "Analysis of an infinite-buffer batch-size-dependent service queue with Markovian arrival process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 161-196, June.
    3. S. Pradhan & U.C. Gupta & S.K. Samanta, 2016. "Queue-length distribution of a batch service queue with random capacity and batch size dependent service: M / G r Y / 1 $M/{G^{Y}_{r}}/1$," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(2), pages 329-343, June.
    4. Yu, Miaomiao & Alfa, Attahiru Sule, 2015. "Algorithm for computing the queue length distribution at various time epochs in DMAP/G(1, a, b)/1/N queue with batch-size-dependent service time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 227-239.
    5. Gopinath Panda & Veena Goswami, 2023. "Analysis of a Discrete-time Queue with Modified Batch Service Policy and Batch-size-dependent Service," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Bar-Lev, Shaul K. & Boxma, Onno & Kleiner, Igor & Perry, David & Stadje, Wolfgang, 2017. "Recycled incomplete identification procedures for blood screening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 330-343.
    7. Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Hans Blanc & Onno Boxma & Guido Janssen & David Perry, 2013. "Tandem Queues with Impatient Customers for Blood Screening Procedures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 423-451, June.
    8. Claeys, Dieter & Walraevens, Joris & Laevens, Koenraad & Bruneel, Herwig, 2010. "A queueing model for general group screening policies and dynamic item arrivals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 827-835, December.
    9. S. R. Chakravarthy & Arunava Maity & U. C. Gupta, 2017. "An ‘(s, S)’ inventory in a queueing system with batch service facility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 263-283, November.
    10. S. K. Samanta & R. Nandi, 2021. "Queue-Length, Waiting-Time and Service Batch Size Analysis for the Discrete-Time GI/D-MSP (a,b) / 1 / ∞ $^{\text {(a,b)}}/1/\infty $ Queueing System," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1461-1488, December.
    11. James J. Kim & Douglas G. Down & Mohan Chaudhry & Abhijit Datta Banik, 2022. "Difference Equations Approach for Multi-Server Queueing Models with Removable Servers," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1297-1321, September.
    12. Srinivas R. Chakravarthy & Shruti & Alexander Rumyantsev, 2021. "Analysis of a Queueing Model with Batch Markovian Arrival Process and General Distribution for Group Clearance," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1551-1579, December.
    13. Guiqing Zhang & Yongxi Cheng & Yinfeng Xu, 2018. "A randomized competitive group testing procedure," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 667-683, April.
    14. Yongxi Cheng & Jue Guo & Feifeng Zheng, 2015. "A new randomized algorithm for group testing with unknown number of defective items," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 150-159, July.
    15. Abhijit Datta Banik & Souvik Ghosh & M. L. Chaudhry, 2020. "On the optimal control of loss probability and profit in a GI/C-BMSP/1/N queueing system," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(1), pages 144-162, March.
    16. Bar-Lev, S.K. & Parlar, M. & Perry, D. & Stadje, W. & van der Duyn Schouten, F.A., 2007. "Applications of bulk queues to group testing models with incomplete identification," Other publications TiSEM 0b1bfa5e-c1e6-43ec-9684-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Hae-Young Kim & Michael G. Hudgens & Jonathan M. Dreyfuss & Daniel J. Westreich & Christopher D. Pilcher, 2007. "Comparison of Group Testing Algorithms for Case Identification in the Presence of Test Error," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1152-1163, December.
    18. Hrayer Aprahamian & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish, 2020. "Optimal Group Testing: Structural Properties and Robust Solutions, with Application to Public Health Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 895-911, October.
    19. Wang, Xiaofang & Zhuang, Jun, 2011. "Balancing congestion and security in the presence of strategic applicants with private information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 100-111, July.
    20. Sarah Kok & Alexander Rutherford & Reka Gustafson & Rolando Barrios & Julio Montaner & Krisztina Vasarhelyi, 2015. "Optimizing an HIV testing program using a system dynamics model of the continuum of care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 334-362, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:229:y:2015:i:1:p:265-286:10.1007/s10479-014-1766-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.