IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Dissimilarity and similarity measures for comparing dendrograms and their applications

  • Isabella Morlini

    ()

  • Sergio Zani

    ()

Registered author(s):

    No abstract is available for this item.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11634-012-0106-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer & German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl) & Japanese Classification Society (JCS) & Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG) & International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS) in its journal Advances in Data Analysis and Classification.

    Volume (Year): 6 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 (July)
    Pages: 85-105

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:spr:advdac:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:85-105
    DOI: 10.1007/s11634-012-0106-2
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.springer.com

    Web page: http://www.gfkl.org/en/

    Web page: http://www.bunrui.jp/en/

    Web page: http://dssm.unipa.it/cladag

    Web page: http://www.classification-society.org/

    Order Information: Web: http://www.springer.com/statistics/statistical+theory+and+methods/journal/11634/PS2

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Lawrence Hubert & Phipps Arabie, 1985. "Comparing partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 193-218, December.
    2. François-Joseph Lapointe & Pierre Legendre, 1995. "Comparison tests for dendrograms: A comparative evaluation," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 12(2), pages 265-282, September.
    3. Genane Youness & Gilbert Saporta, 2010. "Comparing partitions of two sets of units based on the same variables," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 4(1), pages 53-64, April.
    4. Douglas Steinley & Michael Brusco, 2008. "Selection of Variables in Cluster Analysis: An Empirical Comparison of Eight Procedures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 125-144, March.
    5. Matthijs Warrens, 2008. "On the Equivalence of Cohen’s Kappa and the Hubert-Arabie Adjusted Rand Index," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(2), pages 177-183, November.
    6. E. Fowlkes & R. Gnanadesikan & J. Kettenring, 1988. "Variable selection in clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(2), pages 205-228, September.
    7. William Day, 1986. "Foreword: Comparison and consensus of classifications," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 3(2), pages 183-185, September.
    8. Meila, Marina, 2007. "Comparing clusterings--an information based distance," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 873-895, May.
    9. Ahmed N. Albatineh & Magdalena Niewiadomska-Bugaj & Daniel Mihalko, 2006. "On Similarity Indices and Correction for Chance Agreement," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 23(2), pages 301-313, September.
    10. Tadesse, Mahlet G. & Sha, Naijun & Vannucci, Marina, 2005. "Bayesian Variable Selection in Clustering High-Dimensional Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 602-617, June.
    11. Fraiman, Ricardo & Justel, Ana & Svarc, Marcela, 2008. "Selection of Variables for Cluster Analysis and Classification Rules," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 1294-1303.
    12. Ahmed Albatineh & Magdalena Niewiadomska-Bugaj, 2011. "Correcting Jaccard and other similarity indices for chance agreement in cluster analysis," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(3), pages 179-200, October.
    13. Michael Brusco & Douglas Steinley, 2008. "A Binary Integer Program to Maximize the Agreement Between Partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(2), pages 185-193, November.
    14. William Day, 1985. "Optimal algorithms for comparing trees with labeled leaves," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 7-28, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advdac:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:85-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

    or (Rebekah McClure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.