IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v47y20245.html

Using Ecosystem Accounting to Integrate the Environment in Measures of Multifactor Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Carl Obst

Abstract

There is increasing recognition of the relevance of integrating environmental considerations within standard macroeconomic measures including GDP and national wealth and, by extension to measures of multifactor productivity (MFP). A range of approaches to measuring environmentally adjusted MFP (EAMFP) have been developed over the past decade which variously adjust the measure of output or recognize explicitly natural capital inputs. This article summarizes the main approaches to EAMFP and discusses their merits from a national accounting principles perspective, identifying some concerns on potential double counting of environmental contributions and effects. It then considers the potential of ecosystem accounting as described in the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) Ecosystem Accounting to offer an alternative framing for integrating the environment into economy-wide MFP measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl Obst, 2024. "Using Ecosystem Accounting to Integrate the Environment in Measures of Multifactor Productivity," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 47, pages 87-108, Fall.
    • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:47:y:2024:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/using-ecosystem-accounting-to-integrate-the-environment-in-measures-of-multifactor-productivity/
    File Function: Abstract page (English and French)
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-47-5-Obst.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arif Syed & R. Quentin Grafton & Kaliappa Kalirajan & Dean Parham, 2015. "Multifactor productivity growth and the Australian mining sector," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(4), pages 549-570, October.
    2. Paul Schreyer & C. Obst, 2015. "Towards Complete Balance Sheets in the National Accounts: The case of Mineral and Energy Resources," OECD Green Growth Papers 2015/2, OECD Publishing.
    3. Cárdenas Rodríguez, Miguel & Haščič, Ivan & Souchier, Martin, 2018. "Environmentally Adjusted Multifactor Productivity: Methodology and Empirical Results for OECD and G20 Countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 147-160.
    4. Eli P. Fenichel & Joshua K. Abbott, 2014. "Natural Capital: From Metaphor to Measurement," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1-27.
    5. Edens, Bram & Maes, Joachim & Hein, Lars & Obst, Carl & Siikamaki, Juha & Schenau, Sjoerd & Javorsek, Marko & Chow, Julian & Chan, Jessica Ying & Steurer, Anton & Alfieri, Alessandra, 2022. "Establishing the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting as a global standard," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Nicola Brandt & Paul Schreyer & Vera Zipperer, 2014. "Productivity Measurement with Natural Capital and Bad Outputs," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1154, OECD Publishing.
    7. Miguel Cárdenas Rodríguez & Florian Mante & Ivan Haščič & Adelaida Rojas Lleras, 2023. "Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services," OECD Green Growth Papers 2023/01, OECD Publishing.
    8. repec:wbk:wbpubs:23959 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Agarwala & Josh Martin, 2022. "Environmentally-adjusted productivity measures for the UK," Working Papers 028, The Productivity Institute.
    2. Martin, Josh & Agarwala, Matthew, 2023. "Environmentally-adjusted Productivity Measures for the UK," Discussion Papers escoe-dp-2023-06, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence.
    3. Cárdenas Rodríguez, Miguel & Haščič, Ivan & Souchier, Martin, 2018. "Environmentally Adjusted Multifactor Productivity: Methodology and Empirical Results for OECD and G20 Countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 147-160.
    4. Getu Hailu, 2023. "Reflections on technological progress in the agri‐food industry: Past, present, and future," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 71(1), pages 119-141, March.
    5. Wang, Ruixue & Chen, Jiancheng & Han, Ze & An, Chao & Bai, Wanting & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2026. "Assessing structural changes in factor contributions to green productivity growth in China's grain sector," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 80-93.
    6. Hua, Cheng & Wang, Ke, 2023. "Multi-factor productivity growth with natural capital and undesirable output: A measurement for OECD and G20 countries," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(2).
    7. Paul Schreyer, 2021. "Framing Measurement Beyond GDP," CEPA Working Papers Series WP172021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    8. Moriah Bostian & Tommy Lundgren, 2022. "Valuing Ecosystem Services for Agricultural TFP: A Review of Best Practices, Challenges, and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Vlada Vitunskienė & Lina Lauraitienė, 2025. "Green Growth in Agriculture: Long-Term Evidence from European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Yanjie Jiang & Xiaodi Ding, 2025. "Exploring the Nexus Between Ecosystem Services and Economic Sustainability: A Stakeholder Perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3639-3658, May.
    11. Barbier , Edward B., "undated". "From Limits to Growth to Planetary Boundaries: The Evolution of Economic Views on Natural Resource Scarcity," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305259, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Alistair Munro, 2021. "Comment on “Green Innovation and Finance in Asia”," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 16(1), pages 88-89, January.
    13. Sheng, Yu & Zhao, Shiji & Yang, Sansi, 2021. "Weather shocks, adaptation and agricultural TFP: A cross-region comparison of Australian Broadacre farms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Halkos, George & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "New developments in the disciplines of environmental and resource economics," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 513-522.
    15. Edward B. Barbier, 2017. "Natural Capital and Wealth in the 21st Century," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 43(3), pages 391-405, June.
    16. Joachim Maes & Adrián G. Bruzón & José I. Barredo & Sara Vallecillo & Peter Vogt & Inés Marí Rivero & Fernando Santos-Martín, 2023. "Accounting for forest condition in Europe based on an international statistical standard," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Koji Tokimatsu & Louis Dupuy & Nick Hanley, 2019. "Using Genuine Savings for Climate Policy Evaluation with an Integrated Assessment Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 281-307, January.
    18. R. De Santis & P. Esposito & C. Jona Lasinio, 2021. "Environmental regulation and productivity growth: Main policy challenges," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 165, pages 264-277.
    19. Qiang Wang & Tong Liu & Rongrong Li, 2025. "Leveraging Economic Efficiency for CO2 Reduction and Energy Transition: The Role of Climate Vulnerability, GVC Integration, Digitalization and Energy Intensity," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 5038-5068, August.
    20. Sabuj Kumar Mandal & Devleena Chakravarty, 2017. "Role of energy in estimating turning point of Environmental Kuznets Curve: an econometric analysis of the existing studies," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 19(2), pages 387-401, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:47:y:2024:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.