IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v9i34ay2011p226-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The problems of personnel policy in Polish state owned companies' supervisory boards (Problemy polityki personalnej w radach nadzorczych spolek Skarbu Panstwa)

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Postula

    (Wydzial Zarzadzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego)

Abstract

The paper discusses the personnel policy in supervisory boards of Polish state owned companies' (SOCs). The aim of the research conducted by the author was to decide if the personnel policy guarantees that supervisory boards secure SOCs' interests. The accomplishment of this general aim demanded to solve three particular problems. Firstly, whose interests are supported by the personnel policy - only shareholders' or also other SOC' stakeholders', in particular their employees. Secondly, if legal rules guarantee that SOCs' supervisory boards members acquire appropriate skills and knowledge. Thirdly, if personnel policy promotes that SOCs operate according to public interest or stay under the political influence. The research consists of the analysis of regulations as well as large sample analysis conducted among SOCs' management and supervisory boards members.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Postula, 2011. "The problems of personnel policy in Polish state owned companies' supervisory boards (Problemy polityki personalnej w radach nadzorczych spolek Skarbu Panstwa)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(34a), pages 226-246.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:9:i:34a:y:2011:p:226-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/pz_4_2011-1_postula.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Edward Freeman & Andrew C. Wicks & Bidhan Parmar, 2004. "Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 364-369, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    2. Jianzhuang Zheng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Lifeng Chen, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    3. Nir Halevy & Sora Jun & Eileen Y. Chou, 2020. "Intergroup Conflict is Our Business: CEOs’ Ethical Intergroup Leadership Fuels Stakeholder Support for Corporate Intergroup Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 229-246, February.
    4. Lamin B. Ceesay, 2020. "Exploring the Influence of NGOs in Corporate Sustainability Adoption: Institutional-Legitimacy Perspective," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 135-147, December.
    5. Müllner, Jakob & Puck, Jonas, 2018. "Towards a holistic framework of MNE–state bargaining: A formal model and case-based analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 15-26.
    6. Chakraborty, Atreya & Gao, Lucia Silva & Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2019. "Managerial risk taking incentives, corporate social responsibility and firm risk," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-72.
    7. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    8. Daniel Makina, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Financial Inclusion: A Preliminary Review of Literature," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 12-23, October.
    9. AnnMarie Bennett & Breda Murphy, 2017. "The Tax Profession: Tax Avoidance and the Public Interest," Economics Department Working Paper Series n286-17.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    10. Cruz, Thiago Leite & Matlaba, Valente José & Mota, José Aroudo & Filipe dos Santos, Jorge, 2021. "Measuring the social license to operate of the mining industry in an Amazonian town: A case study of Canaã dos Carajás, Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Udeh, Francis Nnoli & Abiahu, Mary-Fidelis Chidoziem & Tambou, Liberty Ejomafuvwe, 2017. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms Financial Performance: A Study of Quoted Banks in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 94923, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jul 2019.
    12. Yanica P. Dimitrova, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation – the Meaningful Connection," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 89-108.
    13. Fumihiko Isada & Yuriko Isada, 2015. "Trans-nationalisation of a main office in a multinational firm," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 3(4), pages 15-40, November.
    14. Christof Miska & Mark E. Mendenhall, 2018. "Responsible Leadership: A Mapping of Extant Research and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 117-134, March.
    15. Nirmala Devi Mohanadas, 2019. "A Theoretical Review on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Shareholder Approach versus Stakeholder Approach," GATR Journals jfbr160, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    16. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.
    17. Dorian Aliu & Ayten Akatay & Armando Aliu & Umut Eroglu, 2017. "Public Policy Influences on Academia in the European Union," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, February.
    18. Robert Kolodinsky & Timothy Madden & Daniel Zisk & Eric Henkel, 2010. "Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 167-181, January.
    19. Huei-Ting Tsai & Hsin-Cheng Chang & Ming-Tien Tsai, 2016. "Predicting repurchase intention for online clothing brands in Taiwan: quality disconfirmation, satisfaction, and corporate social responsibility," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 375-399, September.
    20. Jan Kultys, 2016. "Controversies About Agency Theory As Theoretical Basis For Corporate Governance," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(4), pages 613-634, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:9:i:34a:y:2011:p:226-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.