IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/gosnar/y2012i4p1-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teoretyczne aspekty konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa – w kierunku koncepcji eklektycznej?

Author

Listed:
  • Marlena Dzikowska
  • Marian Gorynia

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest dokonanie przeglądu oraz oceny przydatności najważniejszych teoretycznych koncepcji konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa. Uwagę skoncentrowano w szczególności na ewolucyjnym i kumulatywnym charakterze ich rozwoju. Przedstawianie ram definicyjnych poruszanego zagadnienia rozpoczęto od próby zdefiniowania pojęcia konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa i jego wymiarów. Omówienie wymiarów konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa (rozumianych jako potencjał konkurencyjny, strategia konkurencji oraz pozycja konkurencyjna) miało na celu nie tylko ustalenie wspólnych ram definicyjnych tych zmiennych, ale również zasygnalizowanie możliwych do wykorzystania w badaniach empirycznych wskaźników zmiennych. W dalszej części artykułu zaprezentowano kierunki rozwoju koncepcji konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa w ramach dwóch ujęć (pozycjonowania i zasobowego), sygnalizując różnice występujące w stosowanej w ich wypadku terminologii oraz treści pojęć. Dla obu omawianych nurtów zasygnalizowano również wynikające z analizy dorobku teoretycznego zależności zachodzące pomiędzy wymiarami konkurencyjności. Trzecia z zaprezentowanych koncepcji stanowi próbę przedstawienia eklektycznego ujęcia łączącego cechy zarówno nurtu pozycjonowania, jak i zasobowego, a jednocześnie uwzględniającego charakter zależności występujących pomiędzy analizowanymi wymiarami konkurencyjności w ujęciu dynamicznym.

Suggested Citation

  • Marlena Dzikowska & Marian Gorynia, 2012. "Teoretyczne aspekty konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstwa – w kierunku koncepcji eklektycznej?," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 1-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2012:i:4:p:1-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journalssystem.com/gna/pdf-100997-33025
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Caves & M. E. Porter, 1977. "From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 91(2), pages 241-261.
    2. Stewart Thornhill & Roderick E. White, 2007. "Strategic purity: A multi‐industry evaluation of pure vs. hybrid business strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 553-561, May.
    3. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    4. S.A. Lippman & R.P. Rumelt, 1982. "Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 418-438, Autumn.
    5. Birger Wernerfelt, 1995. "The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 171-174.
    6. Yiannis E. Spanos & Spyros Lioukas, 2001. "An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource‐based perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(10), pages 907-934, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bartosz Deszczyński, 2016. "The Maturity of Corporate Relationship Management," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 73-104.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hart E. Posen & Sangyoon Yi & Jeho Lee, 2020. "A contingency perspective on imitation strategies: When is “benchmarking” ineffective?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 198-221, February.
    2. Dzikowska Marlena & Gorynia Marian, 2020. "Long-term evolution of the subsidiary’s role: a qualitative perspective on a subsidiary located in Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(1), pages 79-95, March.
    3. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    4. Claudia Dias & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues & João J. Ferreira, 2021. "Small agricultural businesses' performance—What is the role of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and environmental sustainability commitment?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1898-1912, May.
    5. Raquel Ortega-Argilés & Rosina Moreno, 2005. "Firm Competitive Strategies And The Likelihood Of Survival - The Spanish Case," ERSA conference papers ersa05p347, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Alexander Kalita & Alexander Chepurenko, 2020. "Competitiveness of Small and Medium Businesses and Competitive Pressure in the Manufacturing Industry," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 36-50.
    7. Harsh W. Mishra, 2012. "Book Review: Catherine A. Maritan and Margaret A. Peteraf (Eds), Competitive Strategy, Vols I and II," Vision, , vol. 16(3), pages 222-226, September.
    8. Luís Cabral, 2018. "We’re Number 1: Price Wars for Market Share Leadership," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2013-2030, May.
    9. Eriksen, Bo & Knudsen, Thorbjorn, 2003. "Industry and firm level interaction: Implications for profitability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 191-199, March.
    10. Chuang, Shu-Hui & Lin, Hong-Nan, 2013. "The roles of infrastructure capability and customer orientation in enhancing customer-information quality in CRM systems: Empirical evidence from Taiwan," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 271-281.
    11. Noordewier, Thomas G. & Lucas, Marilyn T., 2020. "On being green and profitable: Does industry context matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Budhaditya Gupta & Tarun Khanna, 2019. "A Recombination-Based Internationalization Model: Evidence from Narayana Health’s Journey from India to the Cayman Islands," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 405-425, March.
    13. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2015. "Being ‘Green and Competitive’: The Impact of Environmental Actions and Collaborations on Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 413-430, September.
    14. James J. Chrisman & Alan Bauerschmidt & Charles W. Hofer, 1998. "The Determinants of New Venture Performance: An Extended Model," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(1), pages 5-29, October.
    15. Gerstlberger, Wolfgang & Kreuzkamp, Michael & Kiesel, Yvonne, 2008. "Zur Bedeutung eines zertifizierten Managementsystems bei der Umsetzung der MaRisk unter Innovationsaspekten," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 31(2), pages 134-151.
    16. Alina Neamtu Idorasi & Stelian Stancu & Oana Madalina Popescu & Ionut Constantin, 2019. "The customer perspective – an effective and efficient way to differentiate for companies in the globalization era," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 30(1), pages 31-51, December.
    17. Fabio Montobbio & Ilaria Solito, 2018. "Does the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme Foster Innovation in European Firms?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 82-99, January.
    18. Nicholas S. Argyres & Alfredo De Massis & Nicolai J. Foss & Federico Frattini & Geoffrey Jones & Brian S. Silverman, 2020. "History‐informed strategy research: The promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 343-368, March.
    19. Chi Zhang & Qingjun Zeng & Charles Chen & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal & Nipun Dhaulta, 2023. "The Strategic Resources and Competitive Performance of Family-Owned and Non-Family-Owned Firms in the Retail Business of Los Angeles," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 327-355, March.
    20. Victor Oladapo & Godwin Onyeaso, 2012. "An Empirical Investigation Of The Impact Of Luck On Small Business Performance: Dynamic Panel Data Evidence," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(3), pages 29-41.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstwa; potencjał konkurencyjny; strategia konkurencji; pozycja konkurencyjna; nurt pozycjonowania; nurt zasobowy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2012:i:4:p:1-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grzegorz Konat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.