IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2018i2p106-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Организация сетевой общественной экспертизы на основе технологий коллективного интеллекта // Organizing the Net-Wide Public Expert Evaluation Based on Collective Intelligence Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • B. Slavin B.

    (Financial University, Moscow)

  • A. Slavin B.

    (Russian State Social University, Moscow)

  • Б. Славин Б.

    (Финансовый университет, Москва)

  • А. Славин Б.

    (Российский государственный социальный университет, Москва)

Abstract

Public expertise is now becoming an important element of public administration within the concept of open government, allowing to develop strategic plans and programs for the state development. Without the use of network and global communications, it is impossible to organize the expertise with the participation of a large number of specialists. However, the existing network methods of public expertise are not effective, what indicates the relevance of technology study for the organization of public expertise. The purpose of the given article is to study the possibility of using collective intelligence technologies for the organization of public expertise. The research was initiated by the need to study the possibility of using public expertise in the activities of distributed situation centres, which are the basis of public administration. In this regard, a comparative analysis of public and professional expertise was carried out. Possibility of the transfer of the professional expert technology for public expertise was shown. It enables to apply the competence approach and the technologies of collective intelligence for public expertise. The substantiation of the convergence of public and professional expertise allowed to reveal the basic principles of the public expertise organization on the basis of collective intelligence technologies. Among such principles there are: the requirement of closeness of expert communities; participation of representatives of science and practice in the public expertise; competence approach; joint collaborative activities and constant mutual rating of experts. The formulated principles of the organization of public expertise are given in comparison with the use of crowdsourcing. At present, there is a certain disappointment in the use of network methods for the organization of public expertise due to the limited crowdsourcing technologies. The proposed approach to the use of collective intelligence technologies will change the attitude to public expertise as an effective and efficient management tool in the use of open government tools. Общественная экспертиза сегодня становится важным элементом государственного управления в рамках концепции открытого правительства, позволяя разрабатывать стратегические планы и программы развития государства. Без использования сетевых и глобальных коммуникаций организовать экспертизу с участием большого числа специалистов невозможно. Однако существующие сетевые методы проведения общественных экспертиз не эффективны. Это говорит об актуальности изучения технологий для организации общественной экспертизы. Целью данной статьи является исследование возможности использования для организации общественной экспертизы технологий коллективного интеллекта. Исследование было инициировано необходимостью изучения возможности использования общественной экспертизы в деятельности распределенных ситуационных центров, которые являются основой государственного управления. В этой связи был проведен сравнительный анализ общественной и профессиональной экспертиз. Показана возможность переноса профессиональных экспертных технологий на общественную экспертизу. Это позволяет применить к общественной экспертизе компетентностный подход и технологии коллективного интеллекта. Обоснование конвергенции общественной и профессиональной экспертиз позволило выявить основные принципы организации общественной экспертизы на основе технологий коллективного интеллекта. Среди таких принципов: требование закрытости экспертных сообществ; участие в экспертизе как представителей науки, так и представителей практики; компетентный подход; совместная коллаборативная деятельность и постоянное взаимное рейтингование экспертов. Сформулированные принципы организации общественной экспертизы даны в сравнении с использованием краудсорсинга. В настоящее время наблюдается определенное разочарование в использовании сетевых методов для организации общественной экспертизы в силу ограниченности технологий краудсорсинга. Предложенный подход использования технологий коллективного интеллекта позволит изменить отношение к общественной экспертизе как к действенному и эффективному инструменту управления в рамках использования инструментов открытого правительства.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Slavin B. & A. Slavin B. & Б. Славин Б. & А. Славин Б., 2018. "Организация сетевой общественной экспертизы на основе технологий коллективного интеллекта // Organizing the Net-Wide Public Expert Evaluation Based on Collective Intelligence Technologies," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 8(2), pages 106-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:2:p:106-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/154/158.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanchez, Ron, 2004. "Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 518-532, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Slowak, André P., 2009. "Market fields structure & dynamics in industrial automation," FZID Discussion Papers 02-2009, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    2. Yanica Dimitrova, 2018. "The Culture of Innovation Model," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 39-68.
    3. Pierre Barbaroux & Cécile Godé, 2007. "Acquiring core capabilities through organizational learning: Illustrations from the U.S. military organizations," Post-Print hal-00293534, HAL.
    4. Ron Sanchez & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2013. "Modularity and economic organization: concepts, theory, observations, and predictions," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. SLUYTS, Kim & MARTENS, Rudy & MATTHYSSENS, Paul, 2008. "Towards a dynamic concept of alliance capability," Working Papers 2008019, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    6. Kwee, Z. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2007. "Coevolutionary Competence in the Realm of Corporate Longevity: How Long-lived Firms Strategically Renew Themselves," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-076-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Efrat, Kalanit & Hughes, Paul & Nemkova, Ekaterina & Souchon, Anne L. & Sy-Changco, Joseph, 2018. "Leveraging of Dynamic export capabilities for competitive advantage and performance consequences: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 114-124.
    8. Ljungquist, Urban, 2012. "New Dimensions Added for Enhanced Core Competence Application," Working Papers 2012/03, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics.
    9. Reuter, Ute, 2011. "Der ressourcenbasierte Ansatz als theoretischer Bezugsrahmen: Grundlagen, Theoriebausteine und Prozessorientierung," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 3/2011, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    10. Rajkovič Tanja & Prašnikar Janez, 2009. "Technological, Marketing and Complementary Competencies Driving Innovative Performance of Slovenian Manufacturing Firms," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 42(3), pages 77-86, May.
    11. Laurence Viale & Salomée Ruel & Dorsaf Zouari, 2022. "A mixed-methods approach to identifying buyers’ competencies for enabling innovation," Post-Print hal-03695531, HAL.
    12. Anne Lunden & Marianne Teräs & Tarja Kvist & Arja Häggman‐Laitila, 2019. "Transformative agency and tensions in knowledge management—A qualitative interview study for nurse leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 969-979, March.
    13. Mahdi, Omar Rabeea & Nassar, Islam A. & Almsafir, Mahmoud Khalid, 2019. "Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 320-334.
    14. Frédéric MAZAUD (LEREPS-GRES) & Marie LAGASSE (AIRBUS-FRANCE), 2007. "Vertical sub-contracting relationships strategy, the Airbus First-tier suppliers\' coordination," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2007-02, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    15. Roberts, Nicholas & Grover, Varun, 2012. "Investigating firm's customer agility and firm performance: The importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 579-585.
    16. Rahul Kumar Sett, 2018. "Market orientation − firm performance link in a dynamic environment: looking inside the black box," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 163-179, December.
    17. Chih-Hung Wu & Wen-Chang Fang, 2011. "Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 751-768, June.
    18. Danting Cao & Yike Yu, 2023. "Top management team stability and enterprise innovation: A chairman's implicit human capital perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2346-2365, June.
    19. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2010. "Das Elend des Kompetenzbegriffs: Kompetenzkonstrukte in der aktuellen Unternehmenstheorie," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 3/2010, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    20. Richard Kafoněk, 2012. "Competence: Focus on a term as a prerequisite for understanding of the Strategic Competence Management concept," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 499-502.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:2:p:106-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.