IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2018i1p118-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Моделирование Доходов Социально-Экономических Систем На Основе Производственной Функции // Modeling Of Income Of Socio-Economic Systems On The Basis Of The Production Function

Author

Listed:
  • A. Kamaletdinov Sh.

    (Financial University)

  • A. Ksenofontov A.

    (Financial University)

  • А. Камалетдинов Ш.

    (Финансовый университет)

  • А. Ксенофонтов А.

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

Topic. The article examines the problems associated with forecasting of the development prospects of the economy.Purpose. The creation of a model used to predict the replenishment of budgets of all levels. Analysis of the state of the Russian economy in general and its 85 re gions.Methodology. The research was conducted on the basis of economic and statistical techniques, system analysis, and scientific methods of comparison and mapping. The work applied the proposed the authors the term “macroeconomic production function” — an analog of the production function, which expresses the dependence of production results of the enterprise and factors of production. We used data on tax revenues for all kinds of taxes, employment and gross regional product contained in consolidated informationanalytical system of regional tax revenues “Taxes of Russia”. Data analysis and estimation of parameters was performed using the programs of statistical data processing — IBM SPSS Statistics 20. In the multiple regression procedure of SPSS it was used methods of inclusion, allowing step-by-step selection in a regression equation only the significant independent variables.Results. Based on the proposed model, we conducted the comparison of actual and estimated values of tax revenues for all the subjects of the Russian Federation in 2011 and 2014. We obtained the values of point estimates of the model parameters of macroeconomic production functions. Further, we provided simulation of the values of tax revenues for all the subjects of the Russian Federation for 2014 year. Next, we compared the actual and calculated (from the model) values of tax revenues. Finally, we present the results of comparing the actual and estimated (from the model) values of tax revenues for all the subjects of the Russian Federation for 2014 year. Conclusions. The dependence of tax revenues from the factor of labor productivity is constant for every year. With the growth of capital, the amount of tax incomes of subjects of the Russian Federation was threefold higher than increase in productivity of labor. It can be used for planning of economic development of regions. Предмет. В статье исследуются проблемы, связанные с прогнозированием перспектив развития экономики страны.Цель. Создание модели, позволяющей прогнозировать пополнение бюджетов всех уровней. Анализ состояния экономики Российской Федерации в целом и ее 85 субъектов.Методология. Исследования проводились на основе экономико-статистических методов, системного анализа, а также общенаучных методов сравнений и сопоставлений. В работе применен предложенный авторами статьи термин «макроэкономическая производственная функция» — аналог производственной функции, которая выражает зависимость результатов производства предприятия от факторов производства. Используются данные о налоговых доходах по всем видам налогов, численности занятого населения и валовому региональному продукту, консолидированные в информационно-аналитической системе региональных налоговых поступлений «Налоги РФ». Анализ данных и оценка параметров проводились с помощью программы статистической обработки информации — IBM SPSS Statistics 20. В процедуре множественной регрессии SPSS использовались методы включения, позволяющие производить пошаговый отбор в регрессионное уравнение только значимых независимых переменных.Результаты. На основе предложенной модели проводится сравнение фактических и расчетных значений налоговых поступлений для всех субъектов РФ по данным за 2011 и 2014 гг. Получены значения точечных оценок параметров модели макроэкономической производственной функции. Проведено моделирование значений налоговых поступлений для всех субъектов РФ по данным 2014 г. Произведено сравнение фактических и расчетных (по представленной модели) значений налоговых поступлений. Представлены результаты сравнения фактических и расчетных (по представленной модели) значений налоговых поступлений для всех субъектов РФ по данным 2014 г. Выводы. Зависимость налоговых доходов от фактора производительности труда постоянна ежегодно. Объем налоговых доходов субъектов РФ с ростом капитала троекратно выше, чем от увеличения производительности труда. Это может быть использовано для планирования экономического развития регионов.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Kamaletdinov Sh. & A. Ksenofontov A. & А. Камалетдинов Ш. & А. Ксенофонтов А., 2018. "Моделирование Доходов Социально-Экономических Систем На Основе Производственной Функции // Modeling Of Income Of Socio-Economic Systems On The Basis Of The Production Function," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(1), pages 118-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:1:p:118-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/620/476.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Dreger, 2017. "Long-term growth perspectives in Japan and the Euro area," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 363-375, December.
    2. Rainer Klump & Peter McAdam & Alpo Willman, 2012. "The Normalized Ces Production Function: Theory And Empirics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 769-799, December.
    3. Gerald Daniels & Venoo Kakar, 2017. "Economic Growth and the CES Production Function with Human Capital," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(2), pages 930-951.
    4. Serena Brianzoni & Cristiana Mammana & Elisabetta Michetti, 2012. "Local and Global Dynamics in a Discrete Time Growth Model with Nonconcave Production Function," Working Papers 70-2012, Macerata University, Department of Finance and Economic Sciences, revised Sep 2015.
    5. Kang-Wook Lee & Wooyong Jung & Seung Heon Han, 2017. "Country Selection Model for Sustainable Construction Businesses Using Hybrid of Objective and Subjective Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Mallick, Debdulal, 2012. "The role of the elasticity of substitution in economic growth: A cross-country investigation," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 682-694.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federici, Daniela & Saltari, Enrico, 2018. "Elasticity Of Substitution And Technical Progress: Is There A Misspecification Problem?," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 101-121, January.
    2. Michael Knoblach & Fabian Stöckl, 2020. "What Determines The Elasticity Of Substitution Between Capital And Labor? A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 847-875, September.
    3. Gerald Daniels & Venoo Kakar, 2017. "Economic Growth and the CES Production Function with Human Capital," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(2), pages 930-951.
    4. Kemnitz, Alexander & Knoblach, Michael, 2020. "Endogenous sigma-augmenting technological change: An R&D-based approach," CEPIE Working Papers 02/20, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    5. Zha, Donglan & Kavuri, Anil Savio & Si, Songjian, 2017. "Energy biased technology change: Focused on Chinese energy-intensive industries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1081-1089.
    6. Neil Rankin & Rulof Burger & Friedrich Kreuser, 2015. "The elasticity of substitution and labour-displacing technical change in post-apartheid South Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 101, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Zhen, Wang & Xin-gang, Zhao & Ying, Zhou, 2021. "Biased technological progress and total factor productivity growth: From the perspective of China's renewable energy industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Daniels, Gerald Eric & Kakar, Venoo, 2018. "Normalized CES supply-side system approach: How to replicate Klump, McAdam, and Willman (2007)," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-11.
    9. Knoblach, Michael, 2019. "Skill-biased technological change, endogenous labor supply, and the skill premium," CEPIE Working Papers 03/19, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    10. Knoblach, Michael & Rößler, Martin & Zwerschke, Patrick, 2016. "The Elasticity of Factor Substitution Between Capital and Labor in the U.S. Economy: A Meta-Regression Analysis," CEPIE Working Papers 03/16, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    11. Daan Steenkamp, 2018. "Factor Substitution and Productivity in New Zealand," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(304), pages 64-79, March.
    12. Friedrich Kreuser & Rulof Burger & Neil Rankin, 2015. "The elasticity of substitution and labour-displacing technical change in post-apartheid South Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-101, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Paul E. Brockway & Matthew K. Heun & João Santos & John R. Barrett, 2017. "Energy-Extended CES Aggregate Production: Current Aspects of Their Specification and Econometric Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Juan Qian & Ruibing Ji, 2022. "Impact of Energy-Biased Technological Progress on Inclusive Green Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    15. repec:ebl:ecbull:eb-17-00354 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Robert S. Chirinko & Debdulal Mallick, 2014. "The Substitution Elasticity, Factor Shares, Long-Run Growth, and the Low-Frequency Panel Model," CESifo Working Paper Series 4895, CESifo.
    17. Robert S. Chirinko & Debdulal Mallick, 2017. "The Substitution Elasticity, Factor Shares, and the Low-Frequency Panel Model," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 225-253, October.
    18. Dongya Koh & Raül Santaeulàlia-Llopis, 2017. "Countercyclical Elasticity of Substitution," Working Papers 946, Barcelona School of Economics.
    19. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2016_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Trenczek, Jan & Wacker, Konstantin M., 2023. "Human Capital Misallocation and Output per Worker Differences: Beyond Cobb-Douglas," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1331, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    21. Growiec, Jakub, 2018. "Factor-specific technology choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-14.
    22. Akaev, Askar & Devezas, Tessaleno & Ichkitidze, Yuri & Sarygulov, Askar, 2021. "Forecasting the labor intensity and labor income share for G7 countries in the digital age," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:1:p:118-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.