IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/031261/16082044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of decision and participation of rural youth in agricultural production: a case study of youth in Southern region of Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • SUNDAY B. AKPAN

    (Akwa Ibom State University)

  • INIMFON V. PATRICK

    (Akwa Ibom State University)

  • SAMUEL U. JAMES

    (Akwa Ibom State University)

  • DAMIAN I. AGOM

    (Akwa Ibom State University)

Abstract

Evidence of labour constrained in the rural area and increasing rural -urban migration as well as mounting youth unemployment in urban areas of the Southern of Nigeria drove our interest to analyze youth involvement in agricultural activities in the region. Specifically, the study determined factors that modeled rural youth decision and participation in agricultural activities in the Southern region of Nigeria. Data were collected from 300 youth spread across the rural areas of Akwa Ibom State, one of the States in the region. Combinations of sampling methods were used to collect data for the study. Analytical tools used were descriptive and regression analysis (the Logit and Poisson regression). The Logit model estimates revealed that years of youth in social organization, access to ICT, nature of land ownership, and youth access to state owned agricultural programme were positive determined of decision of youth to engage in agricultural activities in the study area. On the contrary, male youth, years of formal education and marital status of youth were negative determinants. The Poisson estimates showed that, youth age, number of extension visit and years in social organization as well as purpose of farming were positive drivers of youth participation (numbers of hours spent in farm per day) in agricultural activities in the rural areas. On the other hand, years of formal education, farm income of previous farming season, land ownership and access to credit triggered youth participation negatively. Perceived constraints to youth involvement in agricultural activities were; insufficient initial capital, insufficient credit facility, poor storage facility, poor access to tractors and inadequate farm land among others. In order to increase youth involvement in agricultural activities in the rural areas, it is recommended that, stake holders should endeavor to provide storage facilities in the rural area to reduce the post-harvest losses. Communities in the rural area should support youth farmers through land donation. In addition government should empowered and strengthen youth groups or social capital formation in the rural Communities. State extension system should be strengthened to deliver more efficient services to youth farmers in the rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunday B. Akpan & Inimfon V. Patrick & Samuel U. James & Damian I. Agom, 2015. "Determinants of decision and participation of rural youth in agricultural production: a case study of youth in Southern region of Nigeria," Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, CyberLeninka;Редакция журнала Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, vol. 43(7), pages 35-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:031261:16082044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/determinants-of-decision-and-participation-of-rural-youth-in-agricultural-production-a-case-study-of-youth-in-southern-region-of-nigeria
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Idowu James Fasakin & Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi & Lateef Olalekan Bello & Djana Mignouna & Razack Adeoti & Zoumana Bamba & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Bola Amoke Awotide, 2022. "Impact of Intensive Youth Participation in Agriculture on Rural Households’ Revenue: Evidence from Rice Farming Households in Nigeria," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Idahosa Igbinakhase & Vannie Naidoo, 2018. "Organisational Capabilities and Replicating Successful Programs Designed to Empower Poor Youths: A Correlational Study," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(5), pages 89-99.
    3. Sunday B. Akpan & Edet J. Udoh & Inimfon V. Patrick, 2016. "Sustaining Small Scale Farming: Evidence of Poverty and income Disparity among Rural Farming Households in South-South Region of Nigeria," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 2(9(14)), pages 4.6-4.4.23, September.
    4. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Yuansheng Jiang & Evans B. Ntiamoah & Selorm Akaba & Kwabena N. Darfor & Linda K. Boateng, 2022. "Access to credit and farmland abandonment nexus: The case of rural Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, February.
    5. Rahamana, S.M. & Haldarb, S. & Sowmyashree, B.V. & Nandid, S. & Malangmeih, L. & Bera, B.K., 2016. "Impact of Nonfarm Activity on Rural Income Inequality in South 24 Parganas District of West Bengal," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 29(1).
    6. Ashiegbu, Gloria Nwakaego & Olagunju, Oluwatoyin & Onyeabor, Edwin Njoba, 2022. "Participation of Rural Youths in Mushroom Production in Umuahia Agricultural Zone, Abia State, Nigeria," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 12(1), March.
    7. Adella Albert Ng’atigwa & Aloyce Hepelwa & Mastewal Yami & Victor Manyong, 2020. "Assessment of Factors Influencing Youth Involvement in Horticulture Agribusiness in Tanzania: A Case Study of Njombe Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Johannes I. F. Henning & Nicolette Matthews & Moatlhodi August & Primrose Madende, 2022. "Youths’ Perceptions and Aspiration towards Participating in the Agricultural Sector: A South African Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:031261:16082044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CyberLeninka (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cyberleninka.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.