IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ecofrm/v6y2017i1p33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quality And The Price Of The Products As Factors For Ð Competitive Advantage In The Companies In The Republic Of Macedonia

Author

Listed:
  • Jusuf Zekiri

    (SEE University, Tetovo Macedonia,)

  • M.Sc. Pance MANOJLOVSKI

    (AD MEPSO, Skopje, Macedonia,)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out how much the price and the quality of products create a competitive advantage for a company. The results will enrich the approach of creating a price for a product by the companies, in addition to paying better attention throughout the manufacturing process of the products regarding their quality. The data for this research has been gathered through two structural questionnaires focused towards employees and managers, as well as consumers, and SPSS is used for data analysis. In this study, the importance of the quality of the product, the improvement of the quality of the products; as well as the quality as a factor that creates competitiveness is analyzed. From the price’s point of view, the importance of the price of the product is also analyzed in order to gain a competitive advantage through the price of the product. The purpose of this study is to find correlations between the importance of the price and the quality of the products. Whether the consumers care more about the price, less about the quality; and vice versa: they care more about quality than they care about the price. Key words: Price; Quality; Competitive advantage; Product JEL Classification: M1; M10

Suggested Citation

  • Jusuf Zekiri & M.Sc. Pance MANOJLOVSKI, 2017. "The Quality And The Price Of The Products As Factors For Ð Competitive Advantage In The Companies In The Republic Of Macedonia," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(1), pages 1-33, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:ecofrm:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecoforumjournal.ro/index.php/eco/article/view/547/357
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duane Ireland, R. & Webb, Justin W., 2007. "Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 49-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alok Kumar Singh & Jyoti Verma & Rajeev Verma, 2020. "Understanding Role of Market-orientated IT Competence and Knowledge Sharing Mechanism in Gaining Competitive Advantage," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(2), pages 418-435, April.
    2. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto & João Luiz Kovaleski & Rui Tadashi Yoshino & Regina Negri Pagani, 2019. "Knowledge and Technology Transfer Influencing the Process of Innovation in Green Supply Chain Management: A Multicriteria Model Based on the DEMATEL Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Belén Casales Morici, 2022. "Strategic corporate entrepreneurship practices in financial services firms: the role of organizational factors," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Kibeshi Kiyabo & Nsubili Isaga, 2019. "Strategic entrepreneurship, competitive advantage, and SMEs’ performance in the welding industry in Tanzania," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Li Xiong, 2022. "Improvise to win: the relationship between entrepreneurial improvisation and start-up competitive advantage," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 184-204, April.
    6. Chitra Singla & Ludvig Levasseur, 2023. "The role of family in unfolding the process of external corporate venturing in small family businesses," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 105-126, June.
    7. Beatrice Karitu & Wanja Wangondu & Stephen Muathe, 2022. "A theoretical route towards conceptualization of start-ups in emerging markets: A Kenyan perspective," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 448-457, June.
    8. Zheng Li & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Intention in Higher Vocational Education: An Empirically-Based Model With Implications for the Entrepreneurial Community," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    9. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt, 2020. "The impact of industry-wide and target market environmental hostility on entrepreneurial leadership in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    10. Soh Hyun Chu & Hongsuk Yang & Mansokku Lee & Sangwook Park, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Bijedić, Teita & Paschke, Max & Pasing, Philipp & Schröder, Christian, 2018. "Digitalisierungskompetenzen in der Führungsebene im Mittelstand," IfM-Materialien 272, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    12. Ignacio De Los Ríos-Carmenado & Mauricio Ortuño & María Rivera, 2016. "Private–Public Partnership as a Tool to Promote Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: WWP Torrearte Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Johansson Jeaneth M. & Malmstrom Malin, 2013. "The Business Model Transparency Paradox in Innovative Growth Ventures: Trade-offs between Competitive Advantages and Agency Costs," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 238-263, January.
    14. Kay, Rosemarie & Nielen, Sebastian & Schröder, Christian, 2018. "SMEs' responses to potentially disruptive innovations: Does strategic entrepreneurship provide an explanation?," Working Papers 06/18, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    15. Adrian Klammer & Stefan Gueldenberg & Sascha Kraus & Michele O’Dwyer, 2017. "To change or not to change–antecedents and outcomes of strategic renewal in SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 739-756, September.
    16. Kuratko, Donald F. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S., 2014. "Why implementing corporate innovation is so difficult," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 647-655.
    17. Simone Cristina Silva Moraes & Pedro Luiz De Oliveira Costa Neto & Irenilza De Alencar Nääs & Luis Mauricio Resende, 2016. "Management of the productive fishing conglomerate in the Amazonas State: the challenge through the sustainability viewpoint," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2/3), pages 363-376.
    18. Cuiping Ma & Jibao Gu & Hefu Liu, 0. "Entrepreneurs’ passion and new venture performance in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-26.
    19. Szambelan, Sebastian & Jiang, Yi & Mauer, René, 2020. "Breaking through innovation barriers: Linking effectuation orientation to innovation performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 425-434.
    20. Talay, Cagri & Oxborrow, Lynn & Brindley, Clare, 2020. "How small suppliers deal with the buyer power in asymmetric relationships within the sustainable fashion supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 604-614.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Key words: Price; Quality; Competitive advantage; Product;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ecofrm:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iulian Condratov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.