IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i6p1528-1548.html

Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-employed

Author

Listed:
  • Isabell Kathrin Stamm

    (Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Societies, Germany)

  • Lena Schürmann

    (Humboldt – Universität zu Berlin, Germany)

  • Katharina Scheidgen

    (Universität Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

As more people work outside standard employment, the foundations of work solidarity are contested. How does work solidarity arise in atypical forms of work that are characterised by flexible, autonomous and self-dependent organisation, such as in solo self-employment? Drawing on a discursive approach to work solidarity, this article emphasises how market dependence can serve as a boundary construction to create work solidarity. Empirically, this study engages in a discourse analysis on Soforthilfe , a policy measure introduced by the German government to financially assist solo self-employed people during the Covid-19 lockdown. In this discourse, market dependence serves to identify this social group’s need (social boundary) and to set out the corresponding policies for financial assistance (substantive boundary). Four solidarity norms – relief, equality, preservation and quasi-equivalence – support this boundary construction. The article contributes to the current discourse on work solidarity by identifying an additional boundary construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabell Kathrin Stamm & Lena Schürmann & Katharina Scheidgen, 2024. "Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-employed," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(6), pages 1528-1548, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1528-1548
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231206083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231206083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231206083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon C Bolton & Knut Laaser, 2020. "The Moral Economy of Solidarity: A Longitudinal Study of Special Needs Teachers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 55-72, February.
    2. Iraklis Dimitriadis, 2023. "Migrants and Undeclared Employment within the European Construction Sector: Challenging Dichotomous Approaches to Workers’ Agency," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(5), pages 1321-1338, October.
    3. Alexander S. Kritikos & Daniel Graeber & Johannes Seebauer, 2020. "Corona-Pandemie wird zur Krise für Selbständige," DIW aktuell 47, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Petr Mezihorak & Annalisa Murgia & Paolo Borghi & Mathilde Mondon-Navazo, 2023. "Representing Solo Self-Employed Workers: The Strengthening of Relations between Traditional and New Collective Actors in Industrial Relations," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1013-1031, August.
    5. Kranzusch, Peter & Schneck, Stefan & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen, 2020. "Die Einkommenslage von Selbstständigen vor dem Hintergrund ihrer Altersvorsorgefähigkeit," IfM-Materialien 285, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    6. Vanessa Beck & Paul Brook, 2020. "Solidarities In and Through Work in an Age of Extremes," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 3-17, February.
    7. Satz, Debra, 2010. "Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195311594.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Genevieve Coderre-LaPalme & Ian Greer & Lisa Schulte, 2023. "Welfare, Work and the Conditions of Social Solidarity: British Campaigns to Defend Healthcare and Social Security," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 352-372, April.
    2. Ruth Reaney & Niall Cullinane, 2024. "Inter-Union Solidarity and Strategic Group Identity: Insights from Works Councils in the French Car Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(2), pages 377-398, April.
    3. Laura J Reeves & Emma Bell, 2025. "Bubbles of Belonging at Work: Redrawing Boundaries of Inclusion and Exclusion in UK Restaurants during Brexit," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(6), pages 1329-1350, December.
    4. Ian Loader & Adam White, 2017. "How can we better align private security with the public interest? Towards a civilizing model of regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 166-184, June.
    5. Jessi Hanson-DeFusco & Natalia Lamberova & Blair Mickles & Tanisha Long & Eliana Beligel & Quinten Boose & Paul Smith & Alexis McMaster & Dragana Djukic-Min, 2024. "#Polarized: Gauging Potential Policy Bargaining Ranges Between Opposing Social Movements of Black Lives Matter and Police Lives Matter," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Marc Fleurbaey & Ravi Kanbur & Dennis Snower, 2025. "Efficiency and equity in a socially-embedded economy," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 79(1), pages 1-56, February.
    7. Eileen Peters & Merle Pohlmeyer & Karin Schulze Buschoff, 2025. "Diverging Paths? The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Subjective Well-Being of the Solo Self-Employed and Employees in Germany (2019–2023)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 183-204, October.
    8. Shoba Arun & Thankom Arun, 2023. "Cracking IT: Negotiating Working-Class Gender Capital through Group Enterprises in India," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(4), pages 823-840, August.
    9. Gregory J. Robson, 2023. "How to Object to the Profit System (and How Not To)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 205-219, November.
    10. Bjorn Bartling & Ernst Fehr & Yagiz ozdemir, 2023. "Does Market Interaction Erode Moral Values?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(1), pages 226-235, January.
    11. Peters, Sally & Roggemann, Hanne & Müller, Stefanie, 2021. "iff-Überschuldungsreport 2021: Überschuldung in Deutschland," iff-Überschuldungsreport, Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen e.V. (iff), number 2021.
    12. Nicolás Maloberti, 2019. "Markets in votes: Alienability, strict secrecy, and political clientelism," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 193-215, May.
    13. Piotr Dworczak & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour, 2021. "Redistribution Through Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1665-1698, July.
    14. Louis-Philippe Hodgson, 2018. "Cohen’s community," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 17(1), pages 23-50, February.
    15. Juri Viehoff, 2019. "Equality of Opportunity in a European Social Market Economy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 28-43, January.
    16. Maksim Belitski & Christina Guenther & Alexander S. Kritikos & Roy Thurik, 2022. "Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 593-609, February.
    17. Benistant, Julien & Galeotti, Fabio & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2022. "Competition, information, and the erosion of morals," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 148-163.
    18. Natalie Gold, 2019. "The limits of commodification arguments: Framing, motivation crowding, and shared valuations," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 165-192, May.
    19. Jared L. Peifer & David R. Johnson & Elaine Howard Ecklund, 2019. "The Moral Limits of the Market: Science Commercialization and Religious Traditions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 183-197, June.
    20. Akyel, Dominic, 2014. "Ökonomisierung und moralischer Wandel: Die Ausweitung von Marktbeziehungen als Prozess der moralischen Bewertung von Gütern," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1528-1548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.