IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v22y2008i4p581-599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and the discourse of labour process transformation: nurses and the case of NHS Direct for England

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Smith

    (Royal Holloway, University of London, chris.smith@rhul.ac.uk)

  • Raffaella Valsecchi

    (Brunel University, Raffaella.Valsecchi@brunel.ac.uk)

  • Frank Mueller

    (University of St Andrews, frankmueller100@yahoo.co.uk)

  • Jonathan Gabe

    (Royal Holloway, University of London, j.gabe@rhul.ac.uk)

Abstract

This article draws on fieldwork conducted with nurses in two sites of NHS Direct, the English tele-nursing service.Theoretically it has two objectives. Firstly to examine a group of professional workers in order to show how the discourse of work transformation associated with the call centre paradigm interacts in a non-mass, non-commercial public sector setting where workers remain attached to their occupational identity and institutional community which mediate call centre values and rationalities. In relation to this objective, the article shows how call centre values inform NHS Direct but do not produce the same outcomes as in commercial settings. Secondly, the article establishes that nurses, as knowledgeable actors, can control, manipulate and create knowledge, without having their autonomy subordinated to the clinical software they are required to use.The article contributes to the labour process approach of call centre working and debates on knowledge management in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Smith & Raffaella Valsecchi & Frank Mueller & Jonathan Gabe, 2008. "Knowledge and the discourse of labour process transformation: nurses and the case of NHS Direct for England," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(4), pages 581-599, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:22:y:2008:i:4:p:581-599
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017008096737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017008096737
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017008096737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damian Grimshaw, 1999. "Changes in Skills-Mix and Pay Determination among the Nursing Workforce in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(2), pages 295-328, June.
    2. Caroline Collin Jacques, 2004. "Professionals at Work: A Study of Autonomy and Skill Utilization in Nurse Call Centres in England and Canada," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Stephen Deery & Nicholas Kinnie (ed.), Call Centres and Human Resource Management, chapter 7, pages 153-173, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Stephen Ackroyd & Sharon Bolton, 1999. "It is not Taylorism: Mechanisms of Work Intensification in the Provision of Gynaecological Services in a NHS Hospital," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(2), pages 369-387, June.
    4. Stephen Deery & Nicholas Kinnie, 2004. "Introduction: The Nature and Management of Call Centre Work," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Stephen Deery & Nicholas Kinnie (ed.), Call Centres and Human Resource Management, chapter 1, pages 1-22, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah Cooke, 2006. "Seagull management and the control of nursing work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(2), pages 223-243, June.
    2. Hemantika Basu, 2019. "Mode of Work Organization in Nursing: Management Practices in Private Healthcare in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(4), pages 433-454, November.
    3. Francis Green & Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Golo Henseke, 2022. "Working Still Harder," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(2), pages 458-487, March.
    4. Damian Grimshaw, 2000. "Public Sector Employment, Wage Inequality and the Gender Pay Ratio in the UK," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 427-448.
    5. Graeme Currie & Rachael Finn & Graham Martin, 2009. "Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 267-284, June.
    6. Diogo Gonçalves-Candeias & Maria José Chambel & Vânia Sofia Carvalho, 2021. "Is Stress in Contact Centers Inevitable?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Francis Green, 2002. "Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?," Studies in Economics 0207, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    8. Sharon C. Bolton, 2004. "A Simple Matter of Control? NHS Hospital Nurses and New Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 317-333, March.
    9. Stephanie Tailby, 2005. "Agency and bank nursing in the UK National Health Service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(2), pages 369-389, June.
    10. Mark Tuson & Tracey England & Doris Behrens & Richard Bowen & Dorothy Edwards & John Frankish & Jude Kay, 2018. "Modelling for the proposed roll-out of the ‘111’ service in Wales: a case study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 159-176, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:22:y:2008:i:4:p:581-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.