IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i15p3078-3094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital nomads in siliconising Cluj: Material and allegorical double dispossession

Author

Listed:
  • Erin McElroy

Abstract

This paper studies the arrival of digital nomads in Cluj, Romania. I focus upon double dispossession, in which ‘digital nomads’ allegorise technocapitalist fantasies by appropriating Roma identity on one hand, and in which Roma are evicted to make way for the arrival of Western digital nomads and tech firms on the other. While Roma are materially dispossessed as Cluj siliconises, they are doubly dispossessed by the conjuration of the deracinated digital nomad/Gypsy. As I suggest, this figure discursively drags with it onto-epistemological residues of 19th-century Orientalism – a literary genre that emerged within the heart of Western European empires. The recoding of the nomad today, I argue, indexes the imperiality of technocapitalism, or techno-imperialism. Double dispossession, as a phenomenon, illuminates that prior histories bolster, and are consumed by, globalising techno-imperialism. Postcolonial and postsocialist studies offer frameworks for understanding this update, as well as the accumulative and multifaceted dispossession that siliconisation inheres. I thus argue for a connected rather than comparative approach in understanding double dispossession, one focused upon connections across time, space and genre. A connected approach remains rooted in community organising and housing justice struggles.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin McElroy, 2020. "Digital nomads in siliconising Cluj: Material and allegorical double dispossession," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3078-3094, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:15:p:3078-3094
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098019847448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019847448
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098019847448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Robinson, 2011. "Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Michael Gentile, 2015. "The Post-Soviet Urban Poor and Where They Live: Khrushchev-Era Blocks, “Bad” Areas, and the Vertical Dimension in Luhansk, Ukraine," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(3), pages 583-603, May.
    3. Harvey, David, 2005. "The New Imperialism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199278084.
    4. D. Asher Ghertner, 2015. "Why gentrification theory fails in 'much of the world'," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 552-563, August.
    5. Matthias Bernt, 2016. "Very particular, or rather universal? Gentrification through the lenses of Ghertner and López-Morales," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 637-644, July.
    6. Manissa M. Maharawal & Erin McElroy, 2018. "The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter Mapping and Oral History toward Bay Area Housing Justice," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(2), pages 380-389, March.
    7. Ban, Cornel, 2016. "Ruling Ideas: How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190600396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Hayes & Hila Zaban, 2020. "Transnational gentrification: The crossroads of transnational mobility and urban research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3009-3024, November.
    2. Thomas Sigler & David Wachsmuth, 2020. "New directions in transnational gentrification: Tourism-led, state-led and lifestyle-led urban transformations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3190-3201, November.
    3. Juan Parreño-Castellano & Josefina Domínguez-Mujica & Claudio Moreno-Medina, 2022. "Reflections on Digital Nomadism in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Effect of Policy and Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Agustin Cocola-Gant & Antonio Lopez-Gay, 2020. "Transnational gentrification, tourism and the formation of ‘foreign only’ enclaves in Barcelona," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3025-3043, November.
    5. Georgia Alexandri & Michael Janoschka, 2020. "‘Post-pandemic’ transnational gentrifications: A critical outlook," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3202-3214, November.
    6. Ionuţ-Marian Anghel & Filip Mihai Alexandrescu, 2023. "‘We lurk in the hidden places’: The (un)stable spatialisation of Roma poverty in Romania," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1875-1893, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary Lawhon & Yaffa Truelove, 2020. "Disambiguating the southern urban critique: Propositions, pathways and possibilities for a more global urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 3-20, January.
    2. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    3. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    4. Erin Collins, 2016. "Postsocialist informality: The making of owners, squatters and state rule in Phnom Penh, Cambodia (1989–1993)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(12), pages 2367-2382, December.
    5. Renan Almeida & Pedro Patrício & Marcelo Brandão & Ramon Torres, 2022. "Can economic development policy trigger gentrification? Assessing and anatomising the mechanisms of state-led gentrification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 84-104, February.
    6. Christian Schmid & Ozan Karaman & Naomi C Hanakata & Pascal Kallenberger & Anne Kockelkorn & Lindsay Sawyer & Monika Streule & Kit Ping Wong, 2018. "Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 19-52, January.
    7. Jamie Peck, 2017. "Transatlantic city, part 1: Conjunctural urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 4-30, January.
    8. Matthew Aaron Richmond & Jeff Garmany, 2016. "‘Post-Third-World City' or Neoliberal ‘City of Exception'? Rio de Janeiro in the Olympic Era," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 621-639, May.
    9. Steininger, Lea & Hesse, Casimir, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 357, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Monika Streule & Ozan Karaman & Lindsay Sawyer & Christian Schmid, 2020. "Popular Urbanization: Conceptualizing Urbanization Processes Beyond Informality," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 652-672, July.
    11. Steffen Wetzstein, 2017. "The global urban housing affordability crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(14), pages 3159-3177, November.
    12. Jim Glassman, 2018. "Geopolitical economies of development and democratization in East Asia: Themes, concepts, and geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 407-415, March.
    13. Patricia M Martin, 2005. "Comparative Topographies of Neoliberalism in Mexico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 203-220, February.
    14. Gore, Christopher D., 2018. "How African cities lead: Urban policy innovation and agriculture in Kampala and Nairobi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 169-180.
    15. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2018. "From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 437-456, March.
    16. Sai Balakrishnan, 2019. "Recombinant Urbanization: Agrarian–urban Landed Property and Uneven Development in India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 617-632, July.
    17. Ramesh, Niranjana, 2022. "An experiment with the minor geographies of major cities: infrastructural relations among the fragments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114952, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Rajani Naidoo, 2011. "Rethinking Development: Higher Education and the New Imperialism," Chapters, in: Roger King & Simon Marginson & Rajani Naidoo (ed.), Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Ahmed, Abubakari & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2018. "The role of chiefs in large-scale land acquisitions for jatropha production in Ghana: insights from agrarian political economy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 570-582.
    20. Chavers, Monyai & Tekola, Sarra & Carroo, Winston & Sherrod, Mikhiela & Shange, Raymon, 2021. "The Intersectionality of Racism, Globalization, Climate Change, and Forced Migration," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 8(1), October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:15:p:3078-3094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.