IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v51y2014i2p247-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Borrowing’ Public Space to Stage Major Events: The Greenwich Park Controversy

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Smith

Abstract

Many commentators suggest that access to public spaces is threatened by privatisation and commercialisation. In this paper, these processes are linked to the festivalisation of cities. Staging temporary festivals in public spaces can animate and promote cities. However, staging events restricts access for some user groups and ‘once in a lifetime’ events may act as precedents—providing justification for further exploitation. This paper explores the use of public parks for events. The paper focuses on Greenwich Park: the equestrian venue during the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Observation work and discourse analysis were undertaken to explore this controversial case. The paper analyses the discourses deployed by those seeking to justify and resist the use of the Park as an Olympic venue. Advocates claimed Games organisers were merely borrowing the park to share it with the world. Ultimately, the research highlights the importance and difficulties of regulating high-profile event projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Smith, 2014. "‘Borrowing’ Public Space to Stage Major Events: The Greenwich Park Controversy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 247-263, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:51:y:2014:i:2:p:247-263
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098013489746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098013489746
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098013489746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marjana Johansson & Jerzy Kociatkiewicz, 2011. "City festivals : creativity and control in staged urban experiences," Post-Print hal-02423783, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith, Andrew & Ritchie, Brent W. & Chien, P. Monica, 2019. "Citizens’ attitudes towards mega-events: A new framework," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 208-210.
    2. Pappalepore, Ilaria & Duignan, Michael B., 2016. "The London 2012 cultural programme: A consideration of Olympic impacts and legacies for small creative organisations in east London," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 344-355.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erwin Van Tuijl & Leo Van den Berg, 2016. "Annual City Festivals as Tools for Sustainable Competitiveness: The World Port Days Rotterdam," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Amalia Cristina NEDELCUȚ & Răzvan Liviu NISTOR, 2021. "Evaluation Of The Satisfaction Level Of Two Digital Art Festivals: Elektro Arts And Clujotronic," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(23), pages 1-4.
    3. Cudny Waldemar & Ogórek Patrycja, 2014. "Segmentation and motivations of the attendees’ of the Mediaschool Festival in Łódź, Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 24(24), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Luca Ferrucci & Antonio Picciotti, 2017. "From economic dualism to local variety: The development of service industries in Italian regions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(1), pages 14-33, February.
    5. Lau, Chammy & Li, Yiping, 2019. "Analyzing the effects of an urban food festival: A place theory approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 43-55.
    6. Nelson de Matos & Marisol B. Correia & José Ramón Saura & Ana Reyes-Menendez & Nuno Baptista, 2020. "Marketing in the Public Sector—Benefits and Barriers: A Bibliometric Study from 1931 to 2020," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Bálint Kádár & János Klaniczay, 2022. "Branding Built Heritage through Cultural Urban Festivals: An Instagram Analysis Related to Sustainable Co-Creation, in Budapest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Hun Kim & Byenghee Chang, 2020. "A Study on the Effects of Crowdfunding Values on the Intention to Visit Local Festivals: Focusing on Mediating Effects of Perceived Risk and e-WOM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Inès Hassen & Massimo Giovanardi, 2021. "Deflecting national ideologies: Exploring identity management trajectories of medium-sized cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1525-1546, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:51:y:2014:i:2:p:247-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.