IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v40y2003i9p1725-1749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Edge Urban Geographies: Notes from the Margins of Europe's Capital Cities

Author

Listed:
  • N.A. Phelps

    (School of Geography, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, n.phelps@geog.leeds.ac.uk)

  • N. Parsons

    (School of European Studies, Cardiff University, PO Box 908, Cardiff, UK, ParsoresN@cardiff.ac.uk)

Abstract

This paper places edge urban formations at the centre of understanding the rescaling of economic, political and social processes. In the European setting in particular, edge urban areas have been understudied and their contribution to the renewal of metropolitan-scale governance and the growth dynamics of major city-regions left largely unrecognised. Moreover, the diverse lineage and complexity of edge urban processes in the European setting militate against unifying analysis. Some contrasts are drawn implicitly with North American edge cities but in doing so, the concern is to contribute to a geographical analysis of edge urban difference. The paper develops three themes regarding European edge urban formations. Specifically, the paper argues that edge urban settlements have lent not only their economic dynamism but also their political and social dynamism to broader city-regions. It notes the manner in which some of these settlements have, in large measure, been created from spatial planning and redistributive policies. Finally, it notes the 'eccentric geometry' of these edge urban areas which display internal fragmentation and whose institutions have expanded their spaces of engagement within the metropolitan sphere. The paper draws upon research on the governance of three European edge urban areas-Croydon (London), Noisy-le-Grand (Paris) and Getafe (Madrid). The grass-roots political movements of Getafe have conferred a lasting political capacity that has been reactivated within recent metropolitan-wide politics and planning. Noisy-le-Grand is a good example of an 'administratively created nowhere'. The entrepeneurialism of council officers in Croydon has been part of a `Croydonisation' of emerging south London institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • N.A. Phelps & N. Parsons, 2003. "Edge Urban Geographies: Notes from the Margins of Europe's Capital Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1725-1749, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:9:p:1725-1749
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000106573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098032000106573
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098032000106573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Brenner, 2000. "The Urban Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of scale," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 361-378, June.
    2. Paul Cheshire, 1999. "Cities in Competition: Articulating the Gains from Integration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 843-864, May.
    3. A Harding, 1991. "The Rise of Urban Growth Coalitions, UK-Style?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 9(3), pages 295-317, September.
    4. Neil Brenner, 1999. "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 431-451, March.
    5. Robert Bennett, 1997. "Administrative Systems and Economic Spaces," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 323-336.
    6. Patrick Le Galès, 1998. "Regulations and Governance in European Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 482-506, September.
    7. Christian Lefèvre, 1998. "Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: a critical review," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 9-25, March.
    8. Gary Marks & Liesbet Hooghe & Kermit Blank, 1996. "European Integration from the 1980s: State‐Centric v. Multi‐level Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 341-378, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walid Oueslati & Seraphim Alvanides & Guy Garrod, 2015. "Determinants of urban sprawl in European cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(9), pages 1594-1614, July.
    2. Ilias-Nikiforos Pasidis & Miquel-Àngel Garcia-López & Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal, 2015. "Express delivery to the suburbs. Transport Infrastructure and European cities," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1239, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Kim, Hyungkyoo & Lee, NaYeon & Kim, Seung-Nam, 2018. "Suburbia in evolution: Exploring polycentricity and suburban typologies in the Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 92-101.
    4. Rick Vermeulen, 2015. "Pursuing the Peripheral Path? A Path-Dependent Analysis of the Frankfurt and Munich Fairs," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 332-348, February.
    5. Patuelli, Roberto & Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Bade, Franz-Josef, 2010. "The evolution of the commuting network in Germany: Spatial and connectivity patterns," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 2(3), pages 5-37.
    6. Hui Cheng & David Shaw, 2021. "POLYCENTRIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE FORMATION OF EDGE URBAN AREAS IN CHINA'S MEGA CITY REGIONS: Case Study of Nansha, Guangzhou," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1009-1027, November.
    7. Nicholas A Phelps & Andrew M Wood & David C Valler, 2010. "A Postsuburban World? An Outline of a Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(2), pages 366-383, February.
    8. Petr Hlaváček & Miroslav Kopáček & Lucie Horáčková, 2019. "Impact of Suburbanisation on Sustainable Development of Settlements in Suburban Spaces: Smart and New Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Fulong Wu & Nicholas A Phelps, 2011. "(Post)Suburban Development and State Entrepreneurialism in Beijing's Outer Suburbs," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(2), pages 410-430, February.
    10. Miquel-Àngel Garcia-López & Ivan Muñiz, 2010. "Employment Decentralisation: Polycentricity or Scatteration? The Case of Barcelona," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(14), pages 3035-3056, December.
    11. Frederic Gilli, 2009. "Sprawl or Reagglomeration? The Dynamics of Employment Deconcentration and Industrial Transformation in Greater Paris," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1385-1420, June.
    12. Zhigao Liu & Jiayi Zhang & Oleg Golubchikov, 2019. "Edge-Urbanization: Land Policy, Development Zones, and Urban Expansion in Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Didier Desponds & Elizabeth Auclair, 2017. "The new towns around Paris 40 years later: New dynamic centralities or suburbs facing risk of marginalisation?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 862-877, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    2. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    3. Paul Waley, 2007. "Tokyo-as-World-City: Reassessing the Role of Capital and the State in Urban Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1465-1490, July.
    4. Huang, Huang & Akaateba, Millicent Awialie & Li, Fengqing, 2020. "A reflection on coproduction processes in urban collective construction land transformation: A case study of Guangzhou in the Pearl River Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Virginie Mamadouh & Olivier Kramsch & Martin Van Der Velde, 2004. "Articulating Local And Global Scales," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(5), pages 455-466, December.
    6. Jiejing Wang & Anthony GO Yeh, 2020. "Administrative restructuring and urban development in China: Effects of urban administrative level upgrading," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1201-1223, May.
    7. Calvin King Lam Chung & Jiang Xu, 2016. "Scale as both material and discursive: A view through China’s rescaling of urban planning system for environmental governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1404-1424, December.
    8. Ioannis Chorianopoulos & Theodoros Iosifides, 2006. "The Neoliberal Framework of EU Urban Policy in Action: Supporting Competitiveness and Reaping Disparities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(4), pages 409-422, November.
    9. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    10. Xue, Jin, 2014. "Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 130-138.
    11. Pengfei Ban & Wei Zhan & Qifeng Yuan & Xiaojian Li, 2021. "Delineating the Urban Areas of a Cross-Boundary City with Open-Access Data: Guangzhou–Foshan, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Darina Òªoni, 2016. "Poverty, Conflict due to the Young, with Parents," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, September.
    13. Zhen Yang & Jun Lei & Jian-Gang Li, 2019. "Identifying the Determinants of Urbanization in Prefecture-Level Cities in China: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Spatial Production Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. John Friedmann, 2001. "Regional Development and Planning: The Story of a Collaboration," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 24(3), pages 386-395, July.
    15. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2022. "The direct and lag effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion patterns in Chinese mega-urban agglomerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Christian Lamour, 2022. "A RADICAL‐RIGHT POPULIST DEFINITION OF CROSS‐NATIONAL REGIONALISM IN EUROPE: Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale Beyond State Borders," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 8-25, January.
    17. Arnouts, Rikke & van der Zouwen, Mariëlle & Arts, Bas, 2012. "Analysing governance modes and shifts — Governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 43-50.
    18. Septimiu-Rare? SZABO, 2013. "Decentralisation In The Context Of Multi-Level Governance: Study Case - Romania," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 92-103, June.
    19. Alan Collins, 2007. "Making Truly Competitive Cities – On The Appropriate Role For Local Government," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 75-80, September.
    20. Mark Purcell, 2006. "Urban Democracy and the Local Trap," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 1921-1941, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:9:p:1725-1749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.