IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v38y2001i12p2167-2194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'It's Not Community Round Here, It's Neighbourhood' : Neighbourhood Change and Cohesion in Urban Regeneration Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Meegan

    (Department of Geography, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, Liverpool, L69 7ZT, UK, meegan@liv.ac.uk)

  • Alison Mitchell

    (Department of Geography, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, Liverpool, L69 7ZT, UK, a.lees@liv.ac.uk)

Abstract

Neighbourhood has become a key spatial scale in the UK government's policies for urban regeneration and social inclusion, resuscitating the long-standing debate over the efficacy of area-based policies. The paper argues that the latter need to be sensitive to the interaction between macro-structural and local, reinforcing processes and that 'people-based' policies need to be complemented by 'people and place' ones. The complexities of `neighbourhood' definition are explored, using the distinction between `neighbourhood' and 'place-based community' to support an argument for seeing neighbourhoods as an appropriate spatial scale for understanding the operation of 'everyday life-worlds'. Drawing on research based on a specific regeneration initiative, the 'Pathways to Integration' priority of the Objective 1 Structural Funds Programme for Merseyside (1994-99), the paper goes on to explore the political and operational issues surrounding the spatial targeting of policy and some of the partnership issues surrounding `neighbourhood' and 'community'. It argues that area-based policies and spatial targeting are inherently political as well as technical exercises that need to be sensitive to the social-spatial construction of neighbourhoods and that the operational definition of policy areas should be part of an evolutionary process of community engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Meegan & Alison Mitchell, 2001. "'It's Not Community Round Here, It's Neighbourhood' : Neighbourhood Change and Cohesion in Urban Regeneration Policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(12), pages 2167-2194, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:12:p:2167-2194
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980120087117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980120087117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980120087117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howard Glennerster & Ruth Lupton & Philip Noden & Anne Power, 1999. "Poverty, Social Exclusion and Neighbourhood: Studying the area bases of social exclusion," CASE Papers 022, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ofek, Yuval, 2017. "Evaluating social exclusion interventions in university-community partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 46-55.
    2. Mohan, Gretta & Longo, Alberto & Kee, Frank, 2018. "The effect of area based urban regeneration policies on fuel poverty: Evidence from a natural experiment in Northern Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 609-618.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fulong Wu, 2007. "The Poverty of Transition: From Industrial District to Poor Neighbourhood in the City of Nanjing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(13), pages 2673-2694, December.
    2. Brian Nolan & Christopher T. Whelan, 1999. "Poverty In Ireland: The Role of Underclass Processes. Published as 'Urban Housing and the Role of Underclass Processes: the Case of Ireland?, Journal of European Social Policy, 2000 Vol 10 No 1," Papers WP115, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    3. William A. V. Clark & Philip S. Morrison, 2012. "Socio-spatial Mobility and Residential Sorting: Evidence from a Large-scale Survey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3253-3270, November.
    4. Gillian R Smith, 1999. "Area-based Initiatives: The rationale and options for area targeting," CASE Papers 025, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    5. Rowland Atkinson & Keith Kintrea, 2002. "Area effects: what do they mean for British housing and regeneration policy?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 147-166.
    6. Lupton, Ruth, 2005. "Changing neighbourhoods? Mapping the geography of poverty and worklessness using the 1991 and 2001 census," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27359, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. James Wallace & Nelarine Cornelius, 2010. "Community Development and Social Regeneration: How the Third Sector Addresses the Needs of BME Communities in Post-Industrial Cities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 43-54, December.
    8. John Micklewright, 2002. "Social Exclusion and Children: A European view for a US debate," CASE Papers 051, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    9. Joshi, Heather & McCulloch, Andrew, 2000. "Neighbourhood and family influences on the cognitive ability of children in the British National Child Development Study," ISER Working Paper Series 2000-24, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    10. Kitty Stewart, 2002. "Measuring Well-Being and Exclusion in Europes Regions," CASE Papers case53, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    11. Thomas Scharf & Chris Phillipson & Allison Smith, 2003. "Older Peopleís Perceptions of the Neighbourhood: Evidence from Socially Deprived Urban Areas," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 8(4), pages 153-164, November.
    12. Kitty Stewart, 2002. "Measuring Well-Being and Exclusion in Europe s Regions," LIS Working papers 303, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    13. Lesley Hemphill & Stanley McGreal & Jim Berry & Siobhan Watson, 2006. "Leadership, Power and Multisector Urban Regeneration Partnerships," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 59-80, January.
    14. Paul Chatterton & David Bradley, 2000. "Bringing Britain Together?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 15(2), pages 98-111, July.
    15. Micklewright, John, 2002. "Social exclusion and children: a European view for a US debate," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6430, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Annette Hastings, 2007. "Territorial Justice and Neighbourhood Environmental Services: A Comparison of Provision to Deprived and Better-off Neighbourhoods in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(6), pages 896-917, December.
    17. John Holden & Baron Frankal, 2012. "A new perspective on the success of public sector worklessness interventions in the UK’s most deprived areas," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(5-6), pages 610-619, August.
    18. Ade Kearns & Ray Forrest, 2000. "Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(5-6), pages 995-1017, May.
    19. John Hills, 2001. "Inclusion or Exclusion? The Role of Housing Subsidies and Benefits," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(11), pages 1887-1902, October.
    20. Philip S. Morrison, 2005. "Unemployment and Urban Labour Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(12), pages 2261-2288, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:12:p:2167-2194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.