IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v53y2022i5p564-576.html

“What if We Explore…†Promoting Engaged Learning and Collaboration with MOUNTAIN RESCUE

Author

Listed:
  • Denise M. Bressler
  • M. Shane Tutwiler
  • Amanda Siebert-Evenstone
  • Leonard A. Annetta
  • Jason A. Chen

Abstract

Background According to the Committee on STEM Education, K-12 science students need access to learning experiences that promote collaboration and engagement . To fill that void, we need to develop activities that stimulate engaged learning and scaffold effective collaboration . K-12 teacher candidates see value in utilizing games for this purpose. Specifically, tabletop science games can help teachers engage students in science learning and scaffold collaboration . Aim For this study, we designed a collaborative, STEM -themed card game called MOUNTAIN RESCUE and explored its capacity to promote engaged learning and collaboration . Method Four groups of STEM campers (n = 14) in a suburban Mid-Atlantic region played MOUNTAIN RESCUE. All groups had a mix of boys and girls. Play-testers ranged from 10–13 years old. The tabletop game took approximately 30-minutes. During gameplay, players embodied unique STEM roles: physicist, chemist, structural engineer, and electrical engineer. They collaborated to solve challenges related to electricity, physics, chemistry, and engineering design. Discourse was audio-recorded throughout gameplay. Immediately after gameplay, self-report survey data were collected to assess flow and perceptions of collaborative learning. Results Findings demonstrated that the game promoted engagement and collaboration . Specifically, students had a flow -like experience and felt positively about the game's value for collaborative learning. Utterances demonstrating active engagement and constructive thinking became more group-focused over time. Conclusion This study contributes to science education by demonstrating potential benefits of a well-designed, low-tech, science learning environment or—in other words—a tabletop game .

Suggested Citation

  • Denise M. Bressler & M. Shane Tutwiler & Amanda Siebert-Evenstone & Leonard A. Annetta & Jason A. Chen, 2022. "“What if We Explore…†Promoting Engaged Learning and Collaboration with MOUNTAIN RESCUE," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(5), pages 564-576, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:5:p:564-576
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781221120690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781221120690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781221120690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrike Erb, 2015. "Possibilities and Limitations of Transferring an Educational Simulation Game to a Digital Platform," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 817-837, December.
    2. Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck, 2020. "Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 411-431, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahreena Daud & Zarinah Abu Yazid & Norraeffa Md Taib & Mohd Zailani Othman & Idris Osman, 2024. "Evaluating the Impact of Usability Components on User Satisfaction in Educational Board Games using the MEEGA+ Framework," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 195-206.
    2. Deborah Coz & Raphaël Mathevet, 2024. "Human–Wild Boar Coexistence: A Role-Playing Game for Collective Learning and Conflict Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Catherine Hui Tiing Wong & Melor Md Yunus, 2021. "Board Games in Improving Pupils’ Speaking Skills: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Jhih-Ning Jhang & Yi-Chun Lin & Yen-Ting Lin, 2025. "A Study on the Effectiveness of a Hybrid Digital-Physical Board Game Incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals in Elementary School Sustainability Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Willy C. Kriz, 2020. "Gaming in the Time of COVID-19," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 403-410, August.
    6. Miyuki Shimabukuro & Tomohiro Toki & Hitoshi Shimabukuro & Yoshiaki Kubo & Soyo Takahashi & Ryuichi Shinjo, 2022. "Development and Application of an Environmental Education Tool (Board Game) for Teaching Integrated Resource Management of the Water Cycle on Coral Reef Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Jakub Swacha & Rytis Maskeliūnas & Robertas Damaševičius & Audrius Kulikajevas & Tomas Blažauskas & Karolina Muszyńska & Agnieszka Miluniec & Magdalena Kowalska, 2021. "Introducing Sustainable Development Topics into Computer Science Education: Design and Evaluation of the Eco JSity Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Barbara H. Esbjørn & Freja Moltke-Aaen & Kerry A. Schwanz & Melissa Paiva-Salisbury, 2025. "An Innovative Approach to Addressing Compassion Fatigue: A Feasibility Study of a Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 56(6), pages 532-547, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:5:p:564-576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.