IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v52y2021i3p312-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics and the Simulation Facilitator: Taking your Professional Role Seriously

Author

Listed:
  • Marieke de Wijse-van Heeswijk

Abstract

Background: When selecting, managing, and debriefing simulations, facilitators wishing to maintain appropriate standards, face demanding ethical challenges especially in learning contexts. Aim: This article considers why facilitators need to attend to ethical issues in facilitating simulation games. Issues examined include the influence of complexity in socio-technical system simulation games, perceptions of both facilitator and participants’ behaviors by including belief systems. Intervention: A multidisciplinary integrative view of ethical facilitation from a reflective perspective has been used in this article. Method: Literature, interviews and case descriptions were employed to examine what might constitute ethical facilitation . Results: A three layered framework of perspectives on ethical facilitation is proposed and two case study examples are used to describe its application. Further research is being conducted on facilitator tools for dealing with ethical issues. Conclusions: While ethical facilitation is undoubtedly complex, tangible perspectives with scientific foundations can be established and applied on the continuum of open and closed simulation games.

Suggested Citation

  • Marieke de Wijse-van Heeswijk, 2021. "Ethics and the Simulation Facilitator: Taking your Professional Role Seriously," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(3), pages 312-332, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:3:p:312-332
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781211015707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781211015707
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781211015707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nabila Hamdaoui & Mohammed Khalidi Idrissi & Samir Bennani, 2018. "Modeling Learners in Educational Games: Relationship Between Playing and Learning Styles," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(6), pages 675-699, December.
    2. M H Kunc & J D W Morecroft, 2007. "Competitive dynamics and gaming simulation: lessons from a fishing industry simulator," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(9), pages 1146-1155, September.
    3. Jan Achterbergh & Dirk Vriens, 2009. "Introducing Organizations as Social Systems Conducting Experiments," Springer Books, in: Organizations, chapter 0, pages 1-29, Springer.
    4. Haridimos Tsoukas, 2017. "Don't Simplify, Complexify: From Disjunctive to Conjunctive Theorizing in Organization and Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 132-153, March.
    5. Dominik Petko & Regina Schmid & Andrea Cantieni, 2020. "Pacing in Serious Games: Exploring the Effects of Presentation Speed on Cognitive Load, Engagement and Learning Gains," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(2), pages 258-279, April.
    6. Heide K. Lukosch & Geertje Bekebrede & Shalini Kurapati & Stephan G. Lukosch, 2018. "A Scientific Foundation of Simulation Games for the Analysis and Design of Complex Systems," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(3), pages 279-314, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Welch & Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki & Rebecca Piekkari & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, 2022. "Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 4-26, February.
    2. Jan HG Klabbers, 2018. "On the Architecture of Game Science: A Rebuttal," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(3), pages 356-372, June.
    3. Charis Vlados & Nikolaos Deniozos & Demosthenes Chatzinikolaou, 2018. "Global Crisis, Innovation and Change Management: Towards a New Systemic Perception of the Current Globalization Restructuring," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 9-29, August.
    4. Shymko, Yuliya & Khoury, Theodore A., 2023. "From community rootedness to individuated entrepreneuring: The development of entrepreneurial motivation through a temporary community of practice," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    5. Uyen-Phuong Nguyen & Philip Hallinger, 2020. "Assessing the Distinctive Contributions of Simulation & Gaming to the Literature, 1970-2019: A Bibliometric Review," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(6), pages 744-769, December.
    6. Kevin R. Glover & Alec Bodzin, 2019. "Psychometric Testing of a Value-Achievement-Cost Motivation Survey for 12th Grade Health Sciences Students for Use in Simulation-Based-Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(6), pages 789-811, December.
    7. Vitaly L. Tambovtsev, 2021. "Targeted programs in the Russian Federation as a matter for evaluation," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 46-62, April.
    8. Geertje Bekebrede & Ellen Van Bueren & Ivo Wenzler, 2018. "Towards a Joint Local Energy Transition Process in Urban Districts: The GO2Zero Simulation Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Elsahn, Ziad & Earl, Anna, 2022. "Alternative ways of studying time in qualitative international business research: A review and future agenda," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).
    10. Willy C. Kriz & J. Tuomas Harviainen & Timothy C. Clapper, 2018. "Game Science: Foundations and Perspectives," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(3), pages 199-206, June.
    11. Greenhalgh, Trisha & Engebretsen, Eivind, 2022. "The science-policy relationship in times of crisis: An urgent call for a pragmatist turn," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    12. E Tapinos & R G Dyson & M Meadows, 2011. "Does the Balanced Scorecard make a difference to the strategy development process?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(5), pages 888-899, May.
    13. Haridimos Tsoukas & Gerardo Patriotta & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & Sally Maitlis, 2020. "On the way to Ithaka[1]: Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Publication of Karl E. Weick’s The Social Psychology of Organizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1315-1330, November.
    14. Babita Bhatt & Israr Qureshi & Christopher Sutter, 2022. "How do Intermediaries Build Inclusive Markets? The Role of the Social Context," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 925-957, June.
    15. Rens Kortmann & Vincent Peters, 2021. "Becoming the Unseen Helmsman - Game facilitator competencies for novice, experienced, and non-game facilitators," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(3), pages 255-272, June.
    16. Joeri van Laere & Jessica Lindblom & Marieke de Wijse-van Heeswijk, 2021. "Complexifying Facilitation by Immersing in Lived Experiences of on-the-fly Facilitation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(3), pages 346-363, June.
    17. Nora Meziani & Laure Cabantous, 2020. "Acting Intuition into Sense: How Film Crews Make Sense with Embodied Ways of Knowing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1384-1419, November.
    18. Diego Damásio Lima & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Miguel Afonso Sellitto, 2017. "Systemic Analysis of the Brazilian Production Chain of Semiconductors: Graphic Representation and Leverage Points," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 295-316, June.
    19. Poulis, Konstantinos, 2021. "Complexity as an empirical tendency: Promoting non-measurement as a means to enhanced understanding," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 487-496.
    20. Lauri Laine & Ewald Kibler, 2022. "The Social Imaginary of Emancipation in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(2), pages 393-420, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:3:p:312-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.