IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i5p603-624.html

Details and Dynamics: Mental Models of Complex Systems in Game-Based Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Joe A. Wasserman
  • Jaime Banks

Abstract

Background. Although the effectiveness of game-based learning (GBL) is well-supported, much less is known about the process underlying it. Nevertheless, developing a mental model that matches the game system, which in turn models a real-world system, is a promising proposed process. Aim. This article explores the first steps in model matching : identifying the entities and (complex) relations in a game system. Method. Participants ( N = 30) played the analog game DOMINION and completed a multi-step mental model mapping exercise. Categories of entities in mental model maps were inductively identified with grounded theory coding, while complex relations in mental model maps were identified via content analysis. Results. Participants described formal game entities, player actions, sociality, learning processes, and subjective experience in their mental model maps. Participants identified very few complex relations—and no feedback loops—in their mental model maps. Conclusions. Games—and analog games specifically—provide a breadth of resources for model matching and GBL . Through gameplay, learners come to affix conceptual meanings to material objects, a process dubbed lamination.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe A. Wasserman & Jaime Banks, 2017. "Details and Dynamics: Mental Models of Complex Systems in Game-Based Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(5), pages 603-624, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:5:p:603-624
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878117715056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878117715056
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878117715056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krystyna A. Stave & Abby Beck & Chris Galvan, 2015. "Improving Learners’ Understanding of Environmental Accumulations through Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 270-292, June.
    2. PÃ¥l I. Davidsen & J. Michael Spector, 2015. "Critical Reflections on System Dynamics and Simulation/Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 430-444, June.
    3. José P. Zagal & Jochen Rick & Idris Hsi, 2006. "Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(1), pages 24-40, March.
    4. Hans J. E. Korteling & Anne S. Helsdingen & Ralf R. Sluimer, 2017. "An Empirical Evaluation of Transfer-of-Training of Two Flight Simulation Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 8-35, February.
    5. David Quarfoot & Richard A. Levine, 2016. "How Robust Are Multirater Interrater Reliability Indices to Changes in Frequency Distribution?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(4), pages 373-384, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    2. Thomas J. Fennewald & Brent Kievit-Kylar, 2013. "Integrating Climate Change Mechanics Into a Common Pool Resource Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 427-451, April.
    3. Jörg Haßler & Anna-Katharina Wurst & Katharina Pohl & Simon Kruschinski, 2024. "A Consistent Picture? Issue‐Based Campaigning on Facebook During the 2021 German Federal Election Campaign," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    4. An Ansoms & Sara Geenen, 2012. "Simulating Poverty and Inequality Dynamics in Developing Countries," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(6), pages 713-728, December.
    5. Miriam Steiner, 2020. "Soft Presentation of Hard News? A Content Analysis of Political Facebook Posts," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 244-257.
    6. Kimmo Oksanen & Raija Hämäläinen, 2014. "Game Mechanics in the Design of a Collaborative 3D Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 255-278, April.
    7. Miriam Steiner, 2020. "Soft Presentation of Hard News? A Content Analysis of Political Facebook Posts," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 244-257.
    8. Tomas By, 2012. "Formalizing Game-play," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(2), pages 157-187, April.
    9. PÃ¥l I. Davidsen & J. Michael Spector, 2015. "Critical Reflections on System Dynamics and Simulation/Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 430-444, June.
    10. Balgah, Roland Azibo & Benjamin, Emmanuel Olatunbosun & Kimengsi, Jude Ndzifon & Buchenrieder, Gertrud, 2023. "COVID-19 impact on agriculture and food security in Africa. A systematic review and meta-analysis," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    11. Lisa Mertens & Kristine De Martelaer & Arja Sääkslahti & Eva D’Hondt, 2021. "The Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of the Actual Aquatic Skills Test (AAST) for Assessing Young Children’s Motor Competence in the Water," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Marlen Rimbeck & Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim & Alexander Richter, 2025. "Unfolding IoT Adoption: A Status Quo Bias Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 67(6), pages 815-832, December.
    13. Stephen Alessi & Birgit Kopainsky, 2015. "System Dynamics and Simulation/Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(3-4), pages 223-229, June.
    14. Chrysa Stamkou & Vaggelis Saprikis & George F. Fragulis & Ioannis Antoniadis, 2025. "User Experience and Perceptions of AI-Generated E-Commerce Content: A Survey-Based Evaluation of Functionality, Aesthetics, and Security," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Pedro Pinto Neves & Filipe Luz & Eva Vital & Jorge Oliveira, 2021. "INFLUENZA: A Board Game Design Experiment on Vaccination," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 501-512, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:5:p:603-624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.