IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sajbmc/v9y2020i1p10-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taming Consumer Resistance for Taboo Products: The Case of PeeBuddy

Author

Listed:
  • Ruchi Jain
  • Anushree Tandon
  • Ruchi Khandelwal

Abstract

Changes in business environments continually create opportunities for entrepreneurs to target specific emerging needs of their customers. The first disposable female urination device (FUD) PeeBuddy was launched in the Indian market in response to the emergent need among the urban women for a product facilitating safe usage of public washrooms, especially during travel. PeeBuddy is among the many social innovations (Alvord et al., 2004, p. 262), making prominent appearances in emerging economies battling resource constraints (Austin et al., 2006). The purpose of this case is to understand the ideation and execution of this social innovation in the context of countries like India where cultural traditions and subjective norms are held in high regards. In India, issues surrounding women’s personal hygiene are considered taboo for public communiqué. This case explores the use of social media marketing approaches used to circumvent extant cultural barriers hindering the adoption of PeeBuddy, which may be considered as a taboo product in the context of the Indian market. This case is aimed at students undertaking advanced marketing management and consumer behaviour courses to sensitize them about subjective norms and their deep integration within culturally dominated communities. It will establish the need for adopting innovative methods for marketing taboo products and how creativity can be used to retail such products.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruchi Jain & Anushree Tandon & Ruchi Khandelwal, 2020. "Taming Consumer Resistance for Taboo Products: The Case of PeeBuddy," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(1), pages 10-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:10-23
    DOI: 10.1177/2277977919881418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277977919881418
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277977919881418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gretchen Larsen & Maurice Patterson & Ouidade Sabri & Luciana Walther, 2018. "A commentary on the treatment of taboo in consumption and marketing," Post-Print hal-01996348, HAL.
    2. Geoff Mulgan, 2006. "The Process of Social Innovation," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 145-162, April.
    3. Ouidade Sabri, 2017. "Does Viral Communication Context Increase the Harmfulness of Controversial Taboo Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 235-247, March.
    4. James Austin & Howard Stevenson & Jane Wei–Skillern, 2006. "Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Chamu Sundaramurthy & Martina Musteen & Amy E. Randel, 2013. "Social Value Creation: A Qualitative Study Of Indian Social Entrepreneurs," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. White, Leroy, 2018. "A Cook's tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 784-797.
    3. Rohit Bhardwaj & Saurabh Srivastava & Sunali Bindra & Sumit Sangwan, 2023. "An ecosystem view of social entrepreneurship through the perspective of systems thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 250-265, January.
    4. Laura Rodrigo & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Miguel Palacios, 2024. "A typology of social innovation: A comparative study of clustering methodologies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3283-3322, December.
    5. Tânia Martins & Alexandra Braga & Vítor Braga & Marisa R. Ferreira, 2020. "The social innovation Momentum: a qualitative analysis of governance and funding processes," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(1), pages 97-120, March.
    6. Gafar ALMHAMAD & Vilmos LAKATOS & Ali ALKERDI & Lama ALKHATIB, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship Research In The Middle East (Systematic Review)," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 7-15, July.
    7. Etayankara Muralidharan & Saurav Pathak, 2019. "Consequences of Cultural Leadership Styles for Social Entrepreneurship: A Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Sayem Hossain & M. Abu Saleh & Judy Drennan, 0. "A critical appraisal of the social entrepreneurship paradigm in an international setting: a proposed conceptual framework," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    9. Bhatt, Punita & Ahmad, Ali J. & Roomi, Muhammad Azam, 2016. "Social innovation with open source software: User engagement and development challenges in India," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 52, pages 28-39.
    10. Gebreselassie, Andinet Worku, 2019. "On communicating about taboo social issues in least developed countries : The case of Ethiopia," Other publications TiSEM bb35ee74-fdd7-4220-af92-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Elena-Simina Lakatos & Bercea Oana Bianca & Laura Bacali, 2016. "The concept of innovation in social economy. A review and a research agenda," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 11(1), pages 32-50, June.
    12. Neelesh Kumar, 2020. "Social Business Model and its Efficacy: A Case Study on Agroforestry in the Indian Context," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 6(1), pages 195-219, January.
    13. Marina Candi & Monia Melia & Maria Colurcio, 2019. "Two Birds with One Stone: The Quest for Addressing Both Business Goals and Social Needs with Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 1019-1033, December.
    14. Sayem Hossain & M. Abu Saleh & Judy Drennan, 2017. "A critical appraisal of the social entrepreneurship paradigm in an international setting: a proposed conceptual framework," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 347-368, June.
    15. John Hagedoorn & Helen Haugh & Paul Robson & Kate Sugar, 2023. "Social innovation, goal orientation, and openness: insights from social enterprise hybrids," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 173-198, January.
    16. Changhwan Shin, 2018. "How Social Entrepreneurs Affect Performance of Social Enterprises in Korea: The Mediating Effect of Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    18. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2016. "Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:10-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.