IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v5y2015i2p2158244015581553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Don’t Leave U.S. Behind

Author

Listed:
  • Janice Arellano

Abstract

This article examines the pace at which Federal and State legislation were implemented to provide working parents and caregivers the ability to take time off for the birth or adoption of a child, to care for the elderly, sick or disabled family members, and others in need of care. Compared with many industrialized nations, the United States ranks alongside the least generous countries in terms of providing a balanced lifestyle between work and family life. For instance, the United States does not even provide national paid family leave. This article provides the history, purpose, and scope of the Family and Medical Leave Act, and later implementations of State programs. Furthermore, this article will present a brief survey of the paternal, maternal, and parental leave policies of other countries and will provide suggestions for changing existing federal policies to provide a more conducive family and work balance for employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice Arellano, 2015. "Don’t Leave U.S. Behind," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:2158244015581553
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244015581553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015581553
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244015581553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Congressional Budget Office, 2013. "Rising Demand for Long-Term Services and Supports for Elderly People," Reports 44363, Congressional Budget Office.
    2. Congressional Budget Office, 2013. "Rising Demand for Long-Term Services and Supports for Elderly People," Reports 44363, Congressional Budget Office.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Dong & Fabrice Smieliauskas & R. Tamara Konetzka, 2019. "Effects of long-term care insurance on financial well-being," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 44(2), pages 277-302, April.
    2. Crawford, Rowena & Stoye, George & Zaranko, Ben, 2021. "Long-term care spending and hospital use among the older population in England," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Cecchini, Michele, 2018. "The hidden economics of informal elder-care in the United States," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 218-224.
    4. Jacqueline Fiore, 2017. "The Impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion on Medicaid Spending by Health Care Service Category," Working Papers 1706, Tulane University, Department of Economics, revised Mar 2018.
    5. Liliana E. Pezzin & Robert A. Pollak & Barbara S. Schone, 2015. "Bargaining Power, Parental Caregiving, and Intergenerational Coresidence," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(6), pages 969-980.
    6. Warshawsky, Mark, 2017. "A Critical Review of the Urban Institute Model of Financing Long-Term Services and Supports," Working Papers 07414, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    7. Congressional Budget Office, 2017. "Measuring the Adequacy of Retirement Income: A Primer," Reports 53191, Congressional Budget Office.
    8. Alison Felix & Kate Watkins, 2013. "The impact of an aging U.S. population on state tax revenues," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue Q IV, pages 95-127.
    9. Liu, Yinan & Zai, Xianhua, 2022. "The Benefits of Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services on Health," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1079, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Mommaerts, Corina & Truskinovsky, Yulya, 2020. "The cyclicality of informal care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Christopher Whaley & Mary Reed & John Hsu & Vicki Fung, 2015. "Functional Limitations, Medication Support, and Responses to Drug Costs among Medicare Beneficiaries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Joan Costa-i-Font & Nilesh Raut, 2021. "Long-Term Care Partnership Effects on Medicaid and Private Insurance," CESifo Working Paper Series 9335, CESifo.
    13. Shaista Noor & Filzah Md. Isa & Nik Maheran Nik Muhammad, 2021. "Managerial Obstacles Facing the Ageing Care Centres: A Case of Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs," Vision, , vol. 25(3), pages 312-321, September.
    14. Martin B. Hackmann & R. Vincent Pohl & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2018. "Patient Versus Provider Incentives in Long Term Care," NBER Working Papers 25178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Markus Fels, 2020. "On the value of Medicaid in providing access to long‐term care," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(4), pages 933-948, August.
    16. Joelle H. Fong, 2017. "Old-age Frailty Patterns and Implications for Long-term Care Programmes," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(1), pages 114-128, January.
    17. Furtado, Delia & Ortega, Francesc, 2020. "Does Immigration Improve Quality of Care in Nursing Homes?," IZA Discussion Papers 13552, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Ake Blomqvist & Colin Busby, 2014. "Paying for the Boomers: Long-Term Care and Intergenerational Equity," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 415, September.
    19. Martin Benjamin Hackmann & R. Vincent Pohl, 2018. "Patient vs. Provider Incentives in Long-Term Care," CESifo Working Paper Series 7373, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:2158244015581553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.