IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221096145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring and Critiquing Women’s Academic Identity in Higher Education: A Narrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J. Phillips
  • Peta L. Dzidic
  • Emily L. Castell

Abstract

Academia has been characterized as traditional, hierarchical, and selective, founded on patriarchal, imperial, and colonial values that construct and maintain gendered roles and regulations. This has been proposed to disadvantage how women experience, and identify within, academia. A narrative review was conducted to review the literature on women’s academic identities and experiences, and critique the dominant ways of knowing, being, and doing in academia. Thematic synthesis was conducted on 56 qualitative studies (published 2010–2019), illustrating the impact of these values on women’s academic identities and experiences, and normative gendered stereotypes and practices that impact women academics. Furthermore, existing literature is critiqued, exploring the influence of dominant ways of being and knowing (on how questions are asked, the constructs explored, the design decisions made). By providing this commentary, future research can focus on problematizing the system and dismantling the problematic conditions (e.g., underrepresentation, discrimination, and gendered stereotyping) for women in academia.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J. Phillips & Peta L. Dzidic & Emily L. Castell, 2022. "Exploring and Critiquing Women’s Academic Identity in Higher Education: A Narrative Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221096145
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221096145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221096145
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221096145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiayi Zhao & Karen Jones, 2017. "Women and Leadership in Higher Education in China: Discourse and the Discursive Construction of Identity," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Leyerzapf, Hannah & Verdonk, Petra & Ghorashi, Halleh & Abma, Tineke A., 2018. "“We are all so different that it is just … normal.” Normalization practices in an academic hospital in the Netherlands," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 141-150.
    3. Harding, Nancy & Ford, Jackie & Gough, Brendan, 2010. "Accounting for ourselves: Are academics exploited workers?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 159-168.
    4. Arar, Khalid, 2018. "Female Arab faculty staff in the Israeli academy: Challenges and coping strategies," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 313-321.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dambrin, Claire & Lambert, Caroline, 2012. "Who is she and who are we? A reflexive journey in research into the rarity of women in the highest ranks of accountancy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Karen A. Longman, 2018. "Perspectives on Women’s Higher Education Leadership from Around the World," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-6, July.
    3. Jiayi Zhao & Karen Jones, 2017. "Women and Leadership in Higher Education in China: Discourse and the Discursive Construction of Identity," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    5. Clarke, Caroline & Knights, David & Jarvis, Carol, 2012. "A Labour of Love? Academics in Business Schools," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 5-15.
    6. Bao, Li & Tian, Xiaoming, 2022. "Climbing the academic ladder: Chinese women academics seeking recognition on the way to becoming professors," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Mónica Segovia-Pérez & Pilar Laguna-Sánchez & Concepción de la Fuente-Cabrero, 2019. "Education for Sustainable Leadership: Fostering Women’s Empowerment at the University Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Julie MacLeavy, 2021. "Care work, gender inequality and technological advancement in the age of COVID‐19," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 138-154, January.
    9. Tehila Kalagy & Sarah Abu-Kaf & Nirit Portughies & Orna Braun-Lewensohn, 2022. "Diversity Climate, Salutogenic Theory, and the Occupational Health of College-Educated Women from Conservative Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Omar Manky & Sergio Saravia, 2022. "From pure academics to transformative scholars? The crisis of the “ideal academic” in a Peruvian university," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 971-987, July.
    11. Adriana Gil-Juárez, 2019. "A Tale of Two Subjectivities: An Academic Life Story," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Rumens, Nick, 2016. "Sexualities and accounting: A queer theory perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 111-120.
    13. Prasad, Ajnesh, 2015. "Liminal transgressions, or where should the critical academy go from here? Reimagining the future of doctoral education to engender research sustainability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 108-116.
    14. Sorola, Matthew, 2022. "Q methodology to conduct a critical study in accounting: A Q study on accountants’ perspectives of social and environmental reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221096145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.