IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i3p21582440211031883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Who Would Bother Getting a Degree When You Would Be on the Exact Same Pay and Conditions . . .?†Professionalism and the Problem With Qualifications in Early Childhood Education and Care: An Irish Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ayooluwa Oke
  • Judith E. Butler
  • Cian O’Neill

Abstract

Although the literature is replete with research that indicates the importance of qualified and highly skilled practitioners in the provision of quality Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), challenges to the retention of highly skilled graduates and the establishment of a professional ECEC workforce persist. This study investigates the barriers that hinder practitioners from obtaining higher level ECEC qualifications. It presents findings from the perspectives of practitioners ( n = 18) participating in the Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) Scheme using semi-structured interviews. This article is part of a doctoral study with practitioners and parents on quality in ECEC and the impact of technology on quality practice. Importantly, this article presents findings from the practitioner interviews as they relate to the barriers faced by practitioners in obtaining higher level qualifications. Findings indicate that practitioners value the role of qualifications in the provision of quality practice. Despite this, findings suggest that the likelihood of obtaining an ECEC degree is largely dependent on the practitioner’s financial situation. For example, in the absence of appropriate pay scales and occupational profiles, practitioners are forced to avail of social welfare services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayooluwa Oke & Judith E. Butler & Cian O’Neill, 2021. "“Who Would Bother Getting a Degree When You Would Be on the Exact Same Pay and Conditions . . .?†Professionalism and the Problem With Qualifications in Early Childhood Education and Care: An Irish," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211031883
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211031883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211031883
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211031883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merrill, Becca & Cohen-Vogel, Lora & Little, Michael & Sadler, James & Lee, Kenya, 2020. "“Quality” assurance features in state-funded early childhood education: A policy brief," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Matthew Manning & Susanne Garvis & Christopher Fleming & Gabriel T.W. Wong, 2017. "The relationship between teacher qualification and the quality of the early childhood education and care environment," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-82.
    3. Gambaro, Ludovica & Stewart, Kitty & Waldfogel, Jane, 2015. "A question of quality: do children from disadvantaged backgrounds receive lower quality early childhood education and care?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60010, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jo Blanden & Emilia Del Bono & Kirstine Hansen & Birgitta Rabe, 2022. "Quantity and quality of childcare and children’s educational outcomes," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 785-828, April.
    2. van Vugt, Lynn & Nieuwenhuis, Rense & Levels, Mark, 2020. "Escaping the motherhood trap: Parental leave and childcare help young mothers to avoid NEET risks," ROA Research Memorandum 011, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    3. Campbell, Tammy & Gambaro, Ludovica & Stewart, Kitty, 2019. "Inequalities in the experience of early education in England: access, peer groups and transitions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103460, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Chow, Kirby A. & Gaylor, Erika & Grindal, Todd & Tunzi, Dominique & Wei, Xin & Tiruke, Tejaswini, 2021. "Associations of teacher characteristics with preschool suspensions and expulsions: Implications for supports," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Jill E. Yavorsky & Leah Ruppanner, 2022. "Response To David Blau'S Essay," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 937-940, June.
    6. Ashrita Saran & Howard White & Kerry Albright & Jill Adona, 2020. "Mega‐map of systematic reviews and evidence and gap maps on the interventions to improve child well‐being in low‐ and middle‐income countries," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    7. Campbell, Tammy & Gambaro, Ludovica & Stewart, Kitty, 2018. "‘Universal’ early education: Who benefits? Patterns in take-up of the entitlement to free early education among three-year-olds in England," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44(3), pages 515-538.
    8. Tammy Campbell & Ludovica Gambaro & Kitty Stewart, 2019. "Inequalities in the experience of early education in England: Access, peer groups and transitions," CASE Papers /214, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    9. Jo Blanden & Kirstine Hansen & Sandra McNally, 2017. "Quality in early years settings and children’s school achievement," CEP Discussion Papers dp1468, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Eckhardt, Andrea G. & Egert, Franziska, 2020. "Predictors for the quality of family child care: A meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211031883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.