IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i6p1136-1155.html

Delay time model for determining the effectiveness of a system under adverse conditions of production and inspection

Author

Listed:
  • Cristiano AV Cavalcante
  • Augusto CJ Santos
  • Rafael GN Paiva
  • Adetoye A Aribisala
  • Roberta B Da Silva

Abstract

The effectiveness of production is influenced by different events that may disrupt the original production plan, such as degradation in the production process, additional demands and inspection errors. To analyze the impact of these issues on production planning, we propose a delay time model for a single-component system that can experience four different states: good, minor defective, major defective and failed. The model uses cost-rate as a measure of production effectiveness. We conducted an investigation into the consequences of the degradation process, specifically focusing on its impact on the generation of nonconforming products. Additionally, we examined the effects of additional demands on the rate of rework products and analyzed the impact of inspection errors, including both the induction and non-detection of defects. These issues represent adverse conditions that many production systems run into their operation and maintenance processes. The results of our study advise the best strategies to deal with these adverse conditions in order to minimize their impacts on effectiveness of a production system. The proposed model serves as a guide and illustrative example of how these issues can be incorporated in the process of optimizing the effectiveness of production. From this perspective, this paper’s main contribution is a series of insights that widens the manager’s view about the production process in a real system, in which perfect and suitable conditions are not commonly present.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristiano AV Cavalcante & Augusto CJ Santos & Rafael GN Paiva & Adetoye A Aribisala & Roberta B Da Silva, 2024. "Delay time model for determining the effectiveness of a system under adverse conditions of production and inspection," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(6), pages 1136-1155, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:6:p:1136-1155
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231207529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X231207529
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X231207529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tambe, Pravin P. & Kulkarni, Makarand S., 2022. "A reliability based integrated model of maintenance planning with quality control and production decision for improving operational performance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Wang, Huiying & Wang, Wenbin & Peng, Rui, 2017. "A two-phase inspection model for a single component system with three-stage degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 31-40.
    3. Azimpoor, Samareh & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2021. "Joint inspection and product quality optimization for a system with delayed failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Baker, R. D. & Christer, A. H., 1994. "Review of delay-time OR modelling of engineering aspects of maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 407-422, March.
    5. Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lopes, Rodrigo S. & Scarf, Philip A., 2021. "Inspection and replacement policy with a fixed periodic schedule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Li Li & Yong Wang & Kuo-Yi Lin, 2021. "Preventive maintenance scheduling optimization based on opportunistic production-maintenance synchronization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 545-558, February.
    7. Wang, W., 1997. "Subjective estimation of the delay time distribution in maintenance modelling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 516-529, June.
    8. Zhou, Yuxuan & Wang, Xun & Naim, Mohamed M. & Gosling, Jonathan, 2022. "A system dynamics archetype to mitigate rework effects in engineer-to-order supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Sinisterra, Wilfrido Quiñones & Lima, Victor Hugo Resende & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virginio & Aribisala, Adetoye Ayokunle, 2023. "A delay-time model to integrate the sequence of resumable jobs, inspection policy, and quality for a single-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Andreas Goerler & Stefan Voß, 2016. "Dynamic lot-sizing with rework of defective items and minimum lot-size constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2284-2297, April.
    11. Mahmoud Efatmaneshnik & Shraga Shoval, 2023. "Stochastic modelling of process scheduling for reduced rework cost and scrap," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(1), pages 219-237, January.
    12. Scarf, Philip A. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2012. "Modelling quality in replacement and inspection maintenance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 372-381.
    13. Gouiaa-Mtibaa, A. & Dellagi, S. & Achour, Z. & Erray, W., 2018. "Integrated Maintenance-Quality policy with rework process under improved imperfect preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boumallessa, Zeineb & Chouikhi, Houssam & Elleuch, Mounir & Bentaher, Hatem, 2023. "Modeling and optimizing the maintenance schedule using dynamic quality and machine condition monitors in an unreliable single production system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virginio & Ren, Junru & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "A novel delay time modelling method for incorporating reuse actions in three-state single-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Shi, Liangxing & Lv, Xiaolei & Wang, Yalong & He, Yingdong & He, Zhen, 2025. "Joint optimization strategy based on a three-state manufacturing system considering dynamic buffers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Alberti, A.R. & Neto, W.A. Ferreira & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Santos, A.C.J., 2022. "Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    6. Phil Scarf & Naif Alotaibi & Cristiano AV Cavalcante & Augusto JS Rodrigues & Yan R Melo, 2025. "On periodic maintenance for a protection system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(3), pages 568-583, June.
    7. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio, 2022. "A study on the economic and environmental viability of second-hand items in maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Wang, Yu & Xia, Tangbin & Xu, Yuhui & Si, Guojin & Wang, Dong & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2024. "Quality-centered production and maintenance scheduling for multi-machine manufacturing systems under variable operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Akcay, Alp, 2022. "An alert-assisted inspection policy for a production process with imperfect condition signals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 510-525.
    10. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    11. Sinisterra, Wilfrido Quiñones & Lima, Victor Hugo Resende & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virginio & Aribisala, Adetoye Ayokunle, 2023. "A delay-time model to integrate the sequence of resumable jobs, inspection policy, and quality for a single-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Wang, Jiantai & Zhou, Shihan & Peng, Rui & Qiu, Qingan & Yang, Li, 2023. "An inspection-based replacement planning in consideration of state-driven imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Azimpoor, Samareh & Taghipour, Sharareh & Farmanesh, Babak & Sharifi, Mani, 2022. "Joint Planning of Production and Inspection of Parallel Machines with Two-phase of Failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Love, Peter E.D. & Matthews, Jane & Ika, Lavagnon A., 2024. "Rework in relational engineer-to-order production systems: An ‘error-as-process’ archetype," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    15. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    16. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Yan R Melo & Cristiano AV Cavalcante & Phil Scarf & Rodrigo S Lopes, 2023. "A hybrid maintenance policy with fixed periodic structure and opportunistic replacement," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(3), pages 579-591, June.
    18. Sinisterra, Wilfrido Quiñones & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio, 2020. "An integrated model of production scheduling and inspection planning for resumable jobs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    19. Kim, Seokgoo & Choi, Joo-Ho & Kim, Nam Ho, 2022. "Inspection schedule for prognostics with uncertainty management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Wang, Jiantai & Ma, Xiaobing & Yang, Li & Qiu, Qingan & Shang, Lijun & Wang, Jingjing, 2024. "A hybrid inspection-replacement policy for multi-stage degradation considering imperfect inspection with variable probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:6:p:1136-1155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.