IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v237y2023i6p1234-1247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria sensor placement determination in prognostics and health management using combined fault diagnosis, fault detection, and risk indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad
  • Farzin Salehpour-Oskouei

Abstract

In framework of a prognostics and health management (PHM), a stochastic method is proposed for optimal sensor locations determination using three independent criteria indexes, reflecting the efficiency of sensor network: (i) the uncertainty of sensor information, the ability of fault diagnosis of a sensor network, (ii) the reliability of sensors, reflecting the fault detectability in sensor networks, (iii) risk of sensor failure including the consequence of sensor failure scenarios. The dynamic system failure model is developed and analyzed to consider the variation of environmental factors and their related failure threshold characterization along with statistical variance estimation as the information value that each possible sensor placement scenario provides through sensor information. A dynamic failure model is developed to incorporate the interaction of sensors and their corresponding components. It is demonstrated here that considering each criterion independently will not comprehensively determine the optimal placement scenario. An augmented index is formulated through Shannon Entropy theory, ranking all sensor placement scenarios based on proposed combined index. Optimization of sensor placement is demonstrated on a typical steam turbine. As shown in detail, the ranking based on each criterion provides different inconsistent rank for the location of the sensors. The combined index is found practically proper and recommended for rank and selection process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad & Farzin Salehpour-Oskouei, 2023. "Multi-criteria sensor placement determination in prognostics and health management using combined fault diagnosis, fault detection, and risk indexes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1234-1247, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:6:p:1234-1247
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221114735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221114735
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221114735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farzin Salehpour-Oskouei & Mohamad Pourgol-Mohammad, 2017. "Risk assessment of sensor failures in a condition monitoring process; degradation-based failure probability determination," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(3), pages 584-593, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bahareh Tajiani & Jørn Vatn, 2023. "Adaptive remaining useful life prediction framework with stochastic failure threshold for experimental bearings with different lifetimes under contaminated condition," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1756-1777, October.
    2. Farzin Salehpour-Oskouei & Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad, 2018. "Sensor placement determination in system health monitoring process based on dual information risk and uncertainty criteria," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 65-81, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:6:p:1234-1247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.