IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i6p1009-1025.html

Reliability analysis for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation and shock processes

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Bian
  • Guanjun Wang
  • Fengjun Duan

Abstract

This paper studies the reliability problem for systems subject to two types of dependent competing failure processes, that is, soft failure and hard failure processes. A soft failure happens when the total degradation of the system exceeds a given critical level, while a hard failure occurs when the accumulative shock load caused by shocks surpasses the hard failure threshold. These two failure processes are mutually dependent due to the fact that external shocks will bring sudden increments in the degradation of the system, and the total amount of degradation will decrease the hard failure threshold of the system. The system fails whenever either of these two failure modes happens. Assuming that the arrival of shocks follows a Poisson process, the reliability function of the system under cumulative shock model is derived by using some analytical techniques. Some important reliability indices, including the mean lifetime of the system, the expected number of shocks until system failure, the probabilities of soft and hard failures, are calculated explicitly. Moreover, a special case that the hard failure process and soft failure process are mutually independent is also discussed. Monte Carlo method is employed to calculate the multiple integrals existing in the expressions of reliability function and reliability indices. A numerical example of the Reinforced Concrete pier columns on sea bridge is presented to illustrate the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Bian & Guanjun Wang & Fengjun Duan, 2021. "Reliability analysis for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation and shock processes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(6), pages 1009-1025, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:6:p:1009-1025
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211011448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211011448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211011448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Sanling & Coit, David W. & Feng, Qianmei, 2014. "Reliability for systems of degrading components with distinct component shock sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 115-124.
    2. Khac Tuan Huynh & Inma T. Castro & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer, 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," Post-Print hal-00790729, HAL.
    3. Che, Haiyang & Zeng, Shengkui & Guo, Jianbin & Wang, Yao, 2018. "Reliability modeling for dependent competing failure processes with mutually dependent degradation process and shock process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 168-178.
    4. Huynh, K.T. & Castro, I.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C., 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 140-151.
    5. An, Zongwen & Sun, Daoming, 2017. "Reliability modeling for systems subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes with shock loads above a certain level," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 129-138.
    6. Yousefi, Nooshin & Coit, David W. & Song, Sanling & Feng, Qianmei, 2019. "Optimization of on-condition thresholds for a system of degrading components with competing dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang, Fengming & Cui, Lirong & Ye, Zhisheng & Zhou, Yu, 2024. "Reliability analysis for systems with self-healing mechanism in degradation-shock dependence processes with changing degradation rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Lina Bian & Bo Peng & Yong Ye, 2023. "Reliability Analysis and Optimal Replacement Policy for Systems with Generalized Pólya Censored δ Shock Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Wu, Bei & Ding, Dong, 2022. "A gamma process based model for systems subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes under Markovian environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Jiandong Zhang & Rongfang Yan & Yiying Zhang, 2023. "Reliability analysis of fail-safe systems with heterogeneous and dependent components subject to random shocks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1073-1087, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meango, Toualith Jean-Marc & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah, 2020. "Failure interaction model based on extreme shock and Markov processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Jingyi Liu & Yugang Zhang & Bifeng Song, 2019. "Reliability and maintenance modeling for competing failures with intermission considered," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 898-907, October.
    3. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Yousefi, Nooshin & Coit, David W. & Song, Sanling, 2020. "Reliability analysis of systems considering clusters of dependent degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Lyu, Hao & Qu, Hongchen & Yang, Zaiyou & Ma, Li & Lu, Bing & Pecht, Michael, 2023. "Reliability analysis of dependent competing failure processes with time-varying δ shock model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Chen, Zhuoqian, 2025. "A generalized reliability analysis framework for dependent competing failure processes with dynamic-zoned shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Wang, Jia & Bai, Guanghan & Li, Zhigang & Zuo, Ming J., 2020. "A general discrete degradation model with fatal shocks and age- and state-dependent nonfatal shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Xu, Dong & Jia, Xujie & Song, Xueying, 2024. "Reliability analysis of systems with n-stage shock process and m-stage degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    9. Wang, Jia & Li, Zhigang & Bai, Guanghan & Zuo, Ming J., 2020. "An improved model for dependent competing risks considering continuous degradation and random shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Reza Ahmadi, 2024. "Reliability and maintenance modeling for a production system by means of point process observations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 3-26, September.
    11. Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Sheu, Shey-Huei & Zhang, Zhe George, 2017. "A trivariate optimal replacement policy for a deteriorating system based on cumulative damage and inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 74-88.
    12. Giorgio, Massimiliano & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2018. "A new state-dependent degradation process and related model misidentification problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1027-1038.
    13. Hu, Jiawen & Sun, Qiuzhuang, 2026. "A dynamic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to degradation and periodic shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PB).
    14. Hyunju Lee & Ji Hwan Cha, 2021. "A general multivariate new better than used (MNBU) distribution and its properties," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 27-46, January.
    15. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    16. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    17. Dahal, Keshav & Al-Arfaj, Khalid & Paudyal, Krishna, 2015. "Modelling generator maintenance scheduling costs in deregulated power markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 551-561.
    18. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    19. Wang, Guan Jun & Zhang, Yuan Lin, 2013. "Optimal repair–replacement policies for a system with two types of failures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 500-506.
    20. Liu, Yao & Wang, Yashun & Fan, Zhengwei & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Xun, 2021. "Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:6:p:1009-1025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.