IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v29y1997i3p22-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Academic Jungle: Social Practice and the Survival of Economic Ideas

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas I. Palley

    (Public Policy Dept., AFL-CIO, 815 Sixteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006, tpalley@compuserve.com)

Abstract

This paper uses an evolutionary model to analyse the replication of points of view within the economics profession. The model is capable of two very different interpretations regarding the production of knowledge claims. One is labelled the "social practice" approach, while the other is labelled the "intellectual appeal" approach. These competing interpretations have profound implications for understanding the intellectual composition of the economics profession, which in turn has ramifications for the understanding of economic knowledge and economic policy recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas I. Palley, 1997. "The Academic Jungle: Social Practice and the Survival of Economic Ideas," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 22-33, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:29:y:1997:i:3:p:22-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/29/3/22.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas I. Palley, 2019. "Inequality and Stagnation by Policy Design," FMM Working Paper 42-2019, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Lavoie, Marc, 2015. "¿Debería la economía heterodoxa ser enseñada en departamentos de economía, o existe algún espacio para la economía backwater?," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 4-16.
    3. Palley, Thomas, 2017. "A theory of economic policy lock-in and lock-out via hysteresis: Rethinking economists' approach to economic policy," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 11, pages 1-18.
    4. Thomas I. Palley, 2009. "After the Bust: The Outlook for Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policy," Economics Public Policy Brief Archive ppb_97, Levy Economics Institute.
    5. Thomas I. Palley, 2008. "After the Bust: The Outlook for Macroeconomics & Macroeconomic Policy," IMK Working Paper 20-2008, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:29:y:1997:i:3:p:22-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.