IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v5y1993i4p421-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cultural Differences in Family and Sexual Life

Author

Listed:
  • GARY S. BECKER

    (University of Chicago)

  • RICHARD A. POSNER

    (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and University of Chicago Law School)

Abstract

This article uses rational choice theory to explain family and sexual life in so-called primitive societies. It develops implications of the theory that relate the degree of polygamy, the relative value placed on men and women (as proxied by the respective amounts of “bloodwealth†prescribed for killing or wounding a man or a woman), and the degree of homosexuality to each other and to other variables, including the relative numbers of men and women and the mode of production—whether agricultural or hunting and gathering. Examined is quantitative evidence bearing on these implications from almost 70 societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary S. Becker & Richard A. Posner, 1993. "Cross-Cultural Differences in Family and Sexual Life," Rationality and Society, , vol. 5(4), pages 421-431, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:5:y:1993:i:4:p:421-431
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463193005004002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463193005004002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463193005004002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker, Gary S., 1978. "The Economic Approach to Human Behavior," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226041124, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, C. Leigh & Swimmer, Eugene, 1997. "Some empirical evidence on property rights of first peoples," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Douglas, 2016. "Contrived desires, affluence, and welfare: J.K. Galbraith's Pigovian redistribution argument reconsidered," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 611-640, August.
    2. Bazerman, Max H. & Sezer, Ovul, 2016. "Bounded awareness: Implications for ethical decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 95-105.
    3. al-Gharbi, Musa, 2019. "Resistance as Sacrifice: Towards an Ascetic Antiracism," SocArXiv wd54z, Center for Open Science.
    4. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Matei Alexandru Apavaloaei & Mihai-Vladimir Topan & Tudor-Gherasim Smirna, 2022. "The Market for Ideas and Its Validation Filters: Scientific Truth, Economic Profit and Political Approval," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(Special16), pages 884-884, November.
    5. M. Mouchart & R. Orsi & G. Wunsch, 2020. "Causality in Econometric Modeling. From Theory to Structural Causal Modeling," Working Papers wp1143, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    6. Hans Gersbach & Hans Haller, 2009. "The affectionate society: does competition for partners promote friendliness?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 389-403, September.
    7. Georg Schreyögg, 2007. "Betriebswirtschaftslehre nur noch als Etikett?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(56), pages 140-159, January.
    8. Bohnet, Iris & van Geen, Alexandra & Bazerman, Max H., 2012. "When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint versus Separate Evaluation," Working Paper Series rwp12-009, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    9. Kozak Sylwester & Grzęda Łukasz, 2020. "The Development of Human Capital on the Labor Market of the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 47-57, March.
    10. Khalil, Elias, 2022. "Does Friendship Stem from Altruism? Adam Smith and the Distinction between Love-based and Interest-based Preferences," OSF Preprints ygpmq, Center for Open Science.
    11. Hans Gersbach & Hans Haller, 2009. "Bargaining power and equilibrium consumption," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(4), pages 665-690, November.
    12. Groß Steffen W., 2011. "Vom »Gesetz« zur »Form« Überlegungen zum epistemischen und methodologischen Status der Volkswirtschaftslehre / From »Law« to »Form«. Considerations about the epistemic and methodological status of eco," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 405-424, January.
    13. Manouchehr Mokhtari, 2016. "Affordable Health Care," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 135-139, June.
    14. Hans Gersbach & Hans Haller, 2005. "When inefficiency begets efficiency," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 25(1), pages 105-121, January.
    15. John Kay, 2014. "El mapa no es el territorio: un ensayo sobre el estado de la economía," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 16(30), pages 13-24, January-J.
    16. Iris Bohnet & Alexandra van Geen & Max Bazerman, 2016. "When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint vs. Separate Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1225-1234, May.
    17. Elena Dalla Chiara & Federico Perali, 2022. "Relational Well-being and the Many Dimensions of Poverty in Italy," Working Papers 6, SITES.
    18. Sergey Tretyakov, 2013. "Economic efficiency as a model of the social context of the conceptualization of the law," HSE Working papers WP BRP 11/LAW/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin, 2010. "What is sustainability economics?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 445-450, January.
    20. Georges El Haddad, 2019. "The Smithian Market of Religions and its Legacy: Another Great Schism between Economics and Sociology?," Working Papers of BETA 2019-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:5:y:1993:i:4:p:421-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.