IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v34y2022i3p395-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divisiveness, splintering, and the rational interpretation of text

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Joslyn

Abstract

In a historical case study, this paper explores the mechanisms by which the rational interpretation of written text can produce divisiveness and splintering. The mechanisms of division are derived from theories of organizational rationality, cultural logics, organizational memory, and group conflict. The propositions are explored in an analysis of common sense rationality with a focus on the 19 th century Stone-Campbell movement. When emotions are not adequately integrated into the culture of rational interpretation, group conflict can arise. The material characteristics of written text combined with a high-diffusion, low-hierarchy, highly recorded and publicized, and proactively contentious, emotionally triggering environment creates a breeding ground for division. The analysis paints a multi-dimensional picture of division and splintering from a sociomaterial standpoint.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Joslyn, 2022. "Divisiveness, splintering, and the rational interpretation of text," Rationality and Society, , vol. 34(3), pages 395-418, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:395-418
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631221113403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631221113403
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631221113403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:395-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.