IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v23y2011i2p217-233.html

Intrinsic religious orientation and religious rewards: An empirical evaluation of two approaches to religious motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Miran LavriÄ

    (University of Maribor, Slovenia, miran.lavric@uni-mb.si)

  • Sergej Flere

    (University of Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

Gordon Allport defined intrinsic religious orientation as the polar opposite of the utilitarian and instrumental extrinsic orientation. On the other hand, Rodney Stark and associates developed a theory of religion according to which the utilitarian motive is at the very core of (any) religious motivation. A study of undergraduate students from three social settings with different dominant religions (Catholic, Islamic and Eastern Orthodox) showed that the intrinsic religious orientation and the perceived religious rewards, such as expectations of eternal life in heaven or perceptions of God’s help in everyday life, tend to form a unidimensional construct in all the observed samples. On the one hand, these results shed new light on the assumption of intrinsic religious orientation being free of utilitarian and instrumental motives. On the other hand, they lend substantial support to the basic assumption of the rational choice approach to religion.

Suggested Citation

  • Miran LavriÄ & Sergej Flere, 2011. "Intrinsic religious orientation and religious rewards: An empirical evaluation of two approaches to religious motivation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 23(2), pages 217-233, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:23:y:2011:i:2:p:217-233
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463111404670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463111404670
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463111404670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miran LavriÄ & Sergej Flere, 2010. "Measuring religious costs and rewards in a cross-cultural perspective," Rationality and Society, , vol. 22(2), pages 223-236, May.
    2. Raymond Boudon, 1992. "The Understanding of Religious Vitality Needs Additional Factors," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 470-474, October.
    3. Mark Chaves & David E. Cann, 1992. "Regulation, Pluralism, and Religious Market Structure," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(3), pages 272-290, July.
    4. JOHN T. DURKIN Jr. & ANDREW M. GREELEY, 1991. "A Model of Religious Choice Under Uncertainty," Rationality and Society, , vol. 3(2), pages 178-196, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason Wollschleger & Lindsey R. Beach, 2013. "Religious chameleons: Exploring the social context for belonging without believing," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(2), pages 178-197, May.
    2. Katie E. Corcoran, 2013. "Divine exchanges: Applying social exchange theory to religious behavior," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(3), pages 335-369, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katie E. Corcoran, 2013. "Divine exchanges: Applying social exchange theory to religious behavior," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(3), pages 335-369, August.
    2. Marek Loužek, 2007. "Ekonomie náboženství - je hypotéza sekularizace opodstatněná? [Economics of religion - is the secularization hypothesis tenable?]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(5), pages 659-680.
    3. Katie E. Corcoran, 2012. "Religious human capital revisited: Testing the effect of religious human capital on religious participation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 24(3), pages 343-379, August.
    4. Danny Cohen-Zada & Todd Elder, 2012. "Religious Pluralism, Religious Market Shares and the Demand for Religious Schooling," Working Papers 1201, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    5. Augenblick, Ned & Cunha, Jesse M. & Dal Bó, Ernesto & Rao, Justin M., 2016. "The economics of faith: using an apocalyptic prophecy to elicit religious beliefs in the field," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 38-49.
    6. Syed Nisar Hussain Hamdani & Eatzaz Ahmad & Mahmood Khalid, 2004. "Study of Philanthropic Behaviour in Divine Economics Framework," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 875-894.
    7. Helbling, Marc & Michalowski, Ines, 2017. "A New Agenda for Immigration and Citizenship Policy Research," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 3-13.
    8. Erich Gundlach & Matthias Opfinger, 2013. "Special Issue. Guest Editor: Zhihao Yu," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 523-539, August.
    9. Robert J. Barro & Rachel M. McCleary, 2002. "Religion and Political Economy in an International Panel," NBER Working Papers 8931, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Robert Barro & Rachel M. McCleary, 2003. "International Determinants of Religiosity," NBER Working Papers 10147, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Oliveira, Livio Luiz Soares de & Neto, Giácomo Balbinotto, 2013. "The problem of the principal-agent and promotion tournaments in religious organizations: choosing the next pope," MPRA Paper 44610, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Anil Rupasingha & David Freshwater, 2001. "Economics of Religious Participation in the Rural South," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 29(3), pages 256-271, Winter.
    13. Jason Wollschleger & Lindsey R. Beach, 2013. "Religious chameleons: Exploring the social context for belonging without believing," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(2), pages 178-197, May.
    14. Nielsen, Jytte Seested & Bech, Mickael & Christensen, Kaare & Kiil, Astrid & Hvidt, Niels Christian, 2017. "Risk aversion and religious behaviour: Analysis using a sample of Danish twins," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 21-29.
    15. Christopher W. Young & Wayne Eastman, 2013. "The structural failures of the heavenly markets," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(1), pages 41-89, February.
    16. Soldatos, Gerasimos T., 2014. "On the Religion-Public Policy Correlation," MPRA Paper 60859, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Panu Poutvaara & Andreas Wagener, 2004. "The Invisible Hand Plays Dice: Eventualities in Religious Markets," Others 0406005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Oliveira, Livio Luiz Soares de & Neto, Giácomo Balbinotto, 2013. "A teoria do mercado religioso : evidências empíricas da literatura [The theory of religious market : empirical evidence from the literature]," MPRA Paper 51716, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Benito Arrunada, "undated". "Catholic Confessions of Sin as Third Party Moral Enforcement," Gruter Institute Working Papers on Law, Economics, and Evolutionary Biology 3-1-1013, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    20. Daniel M. Hungerman, 2011. "Substitution and Stigma: Evidence on Religious Competition from the Catholic Sex-Abuse Scandal," NBER Working Papers 17589, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:23:y:2011:i:2:p:217-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.