IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v35y2007i2p265-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Neoliberalism Possible: The State's Organization of Business Support for NAFTA in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Fairbrother

    (Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, mfair@berkeley.edu)

Abstract

In shifting from nationalist/statist to neoliberal economic policies, states seek out and build alliances with other advocates—especially large capital—and work to disorganize political opponents—including small business. This article examines the politics of the private sector's involvement in trade liberalization in the developing world through a study of Mexico's proposal, negotiation, and ratification of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The article identifies three instruments that the Mexican state used to construct politically crucial support for NAFTA on the part of domestic business: control over political representation, material concessions to potential critics, and careful strategic framing.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Fairbrother, 2007. "Making Neoliberalism Possible: The State's Organization of Business Support for NAFTA in Mexico," Politics & Society, , vol. 35(2), pages 265-300, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:35:y:2007:i:2:p:265-300
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329207300393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329207300393
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329207300393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:idb:brikps:8702 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chase, Kerry A., 2003. "Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(1), pages 137-174, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evans, Peter, 2010. "Is it Labor’s Turn to Globalize? Twenty-first Century Opportunities and Strategic Responses," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt10j002st, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8529 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rana, Arslan Tariq & Kebewar, Mazen, 2014. "The Political Economy of FDI flows into Developing Countries: Does the depth of International Trade Agreements Matter?," EconStor Preprints 91501, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8527 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Aydin B. Yildirim & J. Tyson Chatagnier & Arlo Poletti & Dirk De Bièvre, 2018. "The internationalization of production and the politics of compliance in WTO disputes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-75, March.
    5. Woll, Cornelia, 2005. "Learning to Act on World Trade: Preference Formation of Large Firms in the United States and the European Union," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Julia Gray & Jonathan Slapin, 2012. "How effective are preferential trade agreements? Ask the experts," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 309-333, September.
    7. Guo, Yunsong & Li, Yanzhi & Lim, Andrew & Rodrigues, Brian, 2008. "Tariff concessions in production sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 543-555, June.
    8. James Tanoos, 2012. "Industry-Based Foreign Direct Investment Around State Gubernatorial Elections: Evidence From The United States," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(5), pages 1-18.
    9. Cornelia Woll, 2007. "From National Champions to Global Players? Lobbying by Dominant Providers during the WTO’s Basic Telecom Negotiations," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/8527, Sciences Po.
    10. Sandra Polaski, 2022. "The strategy and politics of linking trade and labor standards: an overview of issues and approaches," Chapters, in: Handbook on Globalisation and Labour Standards, chapter 11, pages 203-225, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Michael Blanga-Gubbay & Paola Conconi & Mathieu Parenti, 2020. "Globalization for Sale," CESifo Working Paper Series 8239, CESifo.
    12. Cornelia Woll, 2005. "Learning to Act on World Trade. Preference Formation of Large Firms in the United States and the European Union," Sciences Po publications 05/01, Sciences Po.
    13. Postigo, Antonio, 2014. "Liberalisation and Protection under Overlapping Free Trade Agreements: Dynamic Interplay between Free Trade Agreements and Investment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 37(11), pages 1612-1633.
    14. Jappe Eckhardt, 2013. "EU Unilateral Trade Policy-Making: What Role for Import-Dependent Firms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 989-1005, November.
    15. Baccini, Leonardo & Dür, Andreas & Elsig, Manfred, 2015. "The politics of trade agreement design: revisiting the depth-flexibility nexus," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62303, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Kaoru Ishiguro, 2018. "Preferential Trade Agreements under Declining American Hegemony," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 163-170, January.
    17. Galia J. Benítez, 2018. "Business Lobbying: Mapping Policy Networks in Brazil in Mercosur," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-30, October.
    18. Cornelia Woll, 2005. "Learning to Act on World Trade. Preference Formation of Large Firms in the United States and the European Union," Working Papers hal-01065571, HAL.
    19. Ka Zeng & Karen Sebold & Yue Lu, 2020. "Global value chains and corporate lobbying for trade liberalization," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 409-443, April.
    20. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8527 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Natalia Victorovna Kuznetsova, Natalia Alexandrovna Vorobeva, 2015. "Analysis Of Global Integration Processes: South Africa, Asia-Pacific Region And Russia," Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues 2015-01, „Ekonomika“ Society of Economists, Niš (Serbia).
    22. Cornelia Woll, 2005. "Learning to Act on World Trade. Preference Formation of Large Firms in the United States and the European Union," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01065571, HAL.
    23. Mereke Tanaguzova & Simeon Nanovsky & Serik Orazgaliyev, 2023. "Assessing the Effect of Joining the World Trade Organization on Trade Performance: A Study of CIS Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:35:y:2007:i:2:p:265-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.