IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v40y2020i8p946-958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Hélène Elidor

    (VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada)

  • Rhéda Adekpedjou

    (Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Quebec, QC, Canada)

  • Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun

    (VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada)

  • Ali Ben Charif

    (VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada)

  • Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé

    (VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Quebec, QC, Canada)

  • Nathalie Rheault

    (VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada)

  • France Légaré

    (VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation (Tier 1) and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Quebec, QC, Canada
    Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada)

Abstract

Background Informal caregivers often serve as decision makers for dependent or vulnerable individuals facing health care decisions. Decision regret is one of the most prevalent outcomes reported by informal caregivers who have made such decisions. Objective To examine levels of decision regret and its predictors among informal caregivers who have made health-related decisions for a loved one. Data sources We performed a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 2018. Participants were informal caregivers, and the outcome was decision regret as measured using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Review methods Two reviewers independently selected eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We performed a narrative synthesis and presented predictors of decision regret using a conceptual framework, dividing the predictors into decision antecedents, decision-making process, and decision outcomes. Results We included 16 of 3003 studies identified. Most studies ( n = 13) reported a mean DRS score ranging from 7.0 to 32.3 out of 100 (median = 14.3). The methodological quality of studies was acceptable. We organized predictors and their estimated effects (β) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) as follows: decision antecedents (e.g., caregivers’ desire to avoid the decision, OR 2.07, 95% CI [1.04–4.12], P = 0.04), decision-making process (e.g., caregivers’ perception of effective decision making, β = 0.49 [0.05, 0.93], P

Suggested Citation

  • Hélène Elidor & Rhéda Adekpedjou & Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun & Ali Ben Charif & Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé & Nathalie Rheault & France Légaré, 2020. "Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(8), pages 946-958, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:8:p:946-958
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20963038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X20963038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X20963038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    2. Zeelenberg, Marcel & van Dijk, Wilco W. & van der Pligt, Joop & Manstead, Antony S. R. & van Empelen, Pepijn & Reinderman, Dimitri, 1998. "Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 117-141, August.
    3. Zeelenberg, M. & van Dijk, W.W. & van der Pligt, J. & Manstead, A.S.R. & van Empelen, P. & Reinderman, D., 1998. "Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions : The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment," Other publications TiSEM 5968cf3c-de93-4bbf-8445-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Christine M Schmucker & Anette Blümle & Lisa K Schell & Guido Schwarzer & Patrick Oeller & Laura Cabrera & Erik von Elm & Matthias Briel & Joerg J Meerpohl & on behalf of the OPEN consortium, 2017. "Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Zeelenberg, M. & van Dijk, W.W. & van der Pligt, J. & Manstead, A.S.R. & van Empelen, P. & Reinderman, D., 1998. "Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions : The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment," Discussion Paper 1998-35, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Jie, 2015. "A model of regret, investor behavior, and market turbulence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 150-174.
    2. Kate Sweeny & Amanda Dillard, 2014. "The Effects of Expectation Disconfirmation on Appraisal, Affect, and Behavioral Intentions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 711-720, April.
    3. Shalvi, Shaul & Dana, Jason & Handgraaf, Michel J.J. & De Dreu, Carsten K.W., 2011. "Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 181-190, July.
    4. Zheng, Jiakun, 2021. "Willingness to pay for reductions in health risks under anticipated regret," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Koehler, Jonathan J. & Gershoff, Andrew D., 2003. "Betrayal aversion: When agents of protection become agents of harm," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 244-261, March.
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:275-286 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Joshua Buchanan & Amy Summerville & Jennifer Lehmann & Jochen Reb, 2016. "The Regret Elements Scale: Distinguishing the affective and cognitive components of regret," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(3), pages 275-286, May.
    8. Di Caprio, Debora & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Tavana, Madjid, 2019. "The role of anticipated emotions and the value of information in determining sequential search incentives," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    9. van Dijk, W.W. & van der Pligt, J. & Zeelenberg, M., 1999. "Effort invested in vain : The impact of effort on the intensity of disappointment and regret," Other publications TiSEM 4746cce1-ce4d-4fea-b3c4-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Hsieh, Jung-Kuei, 2020. "The effects of transforming mobile services into mobile promotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 195-208.
    11. Zeelenberg, Marcel & van Dijk, Wilco W. & Manstead, Antony S. R., 2000. "Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordonez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 143-154, January.
    12. Mookherjee, Satadruta & Lee, Jennifer J. & Sung, Billy, 2021. "Multichannel presence, boon or curse?: A comparison in price, loyalty, regret, and disappointment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 429-440.
    13. Lisa A Williams & Barbara Masser & Jessie Sun, 2015. "Revisiting the Effect of Anthropomorphizing a Social Cause Campaign," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Abiodun Adegbile & David Sarpong, 2015. "Managerial Engagement with Scenario Planning: A Conceptual Consumption Approach," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 73-80.
    15. Jiwoong Shin & Dan Ariely, 2004. "Keeping Doors Open: The Effect of Unavailability on Incentives to Keep Options Viable," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 575-586, May.
    16. Weber, Bethany J. & Chapman, Gretchen B., 2005. "Playing for peanuts: Why is risk seeking more common for low-stakes gambles?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 31-46, May.
    17. Guerini, Rossella & FitzGibbon, Lily & Coricelli, Giorgio, 2020. "The role of agency in regret and relief in 3- to 10-year-old children," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 797-806.
    18. Hélène Elidor & Ali Ben Charif & Codjo Djignefa Djade & Rhéda Adekpedjou & France Légaré, 2020. "Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Housing Decisions for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Cross-sectional Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(4), pages 416-427, May.
    19. George, Jennifer M. & Dane, Erik, 2016. "Affect, emotion, and decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 47-55.
    20. Francesco Marcatto & Donatella Ferrante, 2008. "The Regret/Disappointment Scale: An instrument for assessing regret and disappointment in decision making," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3, pages 87-99, January.
    21. Kosfeld, M., 1999. "Individual decision making and social interaction," Other publications TiSEM 69e75ff4-8036-4cf5-a270-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:8:p:946-958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.