IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v18y2021i4p285-293.html

Live–virtual–constructive simulation for testing and evaluation of air combat tactics, techniques, and procedures, Part 1: assessment framework

Author

Listed:
  • Heikki Mansikka
  • Kai Virtanen
  • Don Harris
  • Jaakko Salomäki

Abstract

This paper advances live (L), virtual (V), and constructive (C) simulation methodologies by introducing a new LVC simulation framework for the development of air combat tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP). In the framework, TTP is developed iteratively in separate C-, V-, and L-simulation stages. This allows the utilization of the strengths of each simulation class while avoiding the challenges of pure LVC simulations. The C-stage provides the optimal TTP with respect to the probabilities of survival ( P s ) and kill ( P k ) of aircraft without considering the human–machine interaction (HMI). In the V-stage, the optimal TTP is modified by assessing its applicability with P k and P s , as well as HMI measures regarding pilots’ situation awareness, mental workload, and TTP adherence. In the L-stage, real aircraft are used to evaluate whether the developed TTP leads to acceptable P k , P s , and HMI measures in a real-life environment. The iterative nature of the framework enables that V- or L-stages can reveal flaws of the TTP and an inadequate TTP can be returned to the C- or V-stage for revision. This paper is Part 1 of a two-part study. Part 2 demonstrates the use of the framework with operationally used C- and V-simulators as well as real F/A-18C aircraft and pilots.

Suggested Citation

  • Heikki Mansikka & Kai Virtanen & Don Harris & Jaakko Salomäki, 2021. "Live–virtual–constructive simulation for testing and evaluation of air combat tactics, techniques, and procedures, Part 1: assessment framework," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 18(4), pages 285-293, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:285-293
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512919886375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512919886375
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512919886375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poropudas, Jirka & Virtanen, Kai, 2011. "Simulation metamodeling with dynamic Bayesian networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 644-655, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam T Biggs & Joseph A Hamilton & Rachel R Markwald, 2025. "Identifying appropriate scenario termination rules for squad-level simulations of warfighter lethality," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 22(4), pages 521-528, October.
    2. Sanna Aronsson & Henrik Artman & Mikael Mitchell & Robert Ramberg & Rogier Woltjer, 2023. "A live mindset in Live Virtual Constructive simulations: a spin-up for future LVC air combat training," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 20(4), pages 447-465, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Thorwarth & Wael Rashwan & Amr Arisha, 2016. "An analytical representation of flexible resource allocation in hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 148-165, June.
    2. Kabir, Golam & Tesfamariam, Solomon & Francisque, Alex & Sadiq, Rehan, 2015. "Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 220-234.
    3. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E., 2019. "Portfolio optimization of safety measures for the prevention of time-dependent accident scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:285-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.