IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v15y2018i3p269-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Battle damage assessment of surface warship formation based on improved gray relational analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuojie Xie
  • Yuhui Wang
  • Qingxian Wu

Abstract

The paper analyzes the pros and cons of classical gray relational analysis on solving multi-target and multi-attribute problems, and presents an improved gray relational model to assess the battle damage of surface warship formations. First, with an entropy method and analytic hierarchy process, the subjective and objective weights of the index attributes are determined, respectively, and then they are combined with the product method to obtain the combined weight. Second, to make full use of the information carried by the index attributes, a polygon area formed by the adjacent points of the reference sequence curve and alternative sequence curve is used as gray relational coefficient. Third, by combining with the combined weight and the gray relational coefficients, an improved gray relational degree is thus determined. Finally, the numerical results illustrate that the battle damage assessment is generally consistent with the assessment results of experts, and the achieved result will provide important information to make a correct decision for carrying out a next strike.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuojie Xie & Yuhui Wang & Qingxian Wu, 2018. "Battle damage assessment of surface warship formation based on improved gray relational analysis," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 15(3), pages 269-278, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:269-278
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512917740446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512917740446
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512917740446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Chun-Chih & Chuang, Ming-Chuen, 2008. "Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 667-681, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    2. Olimpia I. BAN & Ioana T. MESTER, 2014. "Using Kano Two Dimensional Service Quality Classification And Characteristic Analysis From The Perspective Of Hotels' Clients Of Oradea," Revista de turism - studii si cercetari in turism / Journal of tourism - studies and research in tourism, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 18(18), pages 30-36, December.
    3. Xiaolun Wang & Xinlin Yao, 2020. "Fueling Pro-Environmental Behaviors with Gamification Design: Identifying Key Elements in Ant Forest with the Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Xin Chen & Chengxie Ma & Chengyu Tao, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Sustainability of Stroke Rehabilitation Services in Community: An Analysis Based on Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Julia Troll & Ivo Blohm & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees’ Engagement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 433-450, August.
    6. Damjan Vavpotič & Marko Robnik-Šikonja & Tomaž Hovelja, 2020. "Exploring the Relations Between Net Benefits of IT Projects and CIOs’ Perception of Quality of Software Development Disciplines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 347-360, August.
    7. A. M. M. Sharif Ullah & Jun'ichi Tamaki, 2011. "Analysis of Kano‐model‐based customer needs for product development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 154-172, June.
    8. Xin Bao & Tao Zhang & Bart Julien Dewancker & Jiahao He & Siyuan Liu, 2023. "Exploring the Unit Spatial Layout Preference for Urban Multi-Unit Residential Buildings: A Survey in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Nam, Seungju & Song, Woon-Kyung & Yoon, Heekweon, 2023. "An maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) safety oversight system analysis: A case in Korea," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Fang Wang & Hua Li & Aijun Liu, 2018. "A novel method for determining the key customer requirements and innovation goals in customer collaborative product innovation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 211-225, January.
    11. Ebadi Jokandan , Mohsen & Shahbahrami , Asadollah, 2013. "A Solution for the Allocation of Customers Authentication Methods (The Case of Multimedia Contact Center in Agriculture Bank of Iran)," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 8(2), pages 103-124, April.
    12. Runliang Dou & Yubo Zhang & Guofang Nan, 2019. "Application of combined Kano model and interactive genetic algorithm for product customization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(7), pages 2587-2602, October.
    13. Chao He & Zhongkai Li & Dengzhuo Liu & Guangyu Zou & Shuai Wang, 2023. "Improving the functional performances for product family by mining online reviews," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 2809-2824, August.
    14. Anning Wang & Qiang Zhang & Shuangyao Zhao & Xiaonong Lu & Zhanglin Peng, 2020. "A review-driven customer preference measurement model for product improvement: sentiment-based importance–performance analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 61-88, March.
    15. Mladen Mitrovic, 2017. "Dimensional Structure of Satisfaction with Hotel Services," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 10(1), pages 57-68.
    16. Yongchuan Li & Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2022. "QFD-Based Research on Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design of Smart Home Products for the Elderly: A Case Study of Smart Refrigerators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Chen, Li-Fei, 2012. "A novel approach to regression analysis for the classification of quality attributes in the Kano model: an empirical test in the food and beverage industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 651-659.
    18. Hong-Bin Yan & Van-Nam Huynh & Yoshiteru Nakamori, 2012. "A group nonadditive multiattribute consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation model with an application to traditional crafts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 325-354, May.
    19. Jangwook Kwon & Kyunghwan Lim, 2023. "Using Kano Model to Understand an Effect of Specialization and Perceived Risk on Demand for Services in Marine Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Hong-Bin Yan & Tieju Ma & Songsak Sriboonchitta & Van-Nam Huynh, 2017. "A stochastic dominance based approach to consumer-oriented Kansei evaluation with multiple priorities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(2), pages 329-357, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:269-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.