IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v67y2023i5p828-857.html

The Meddling American Voter? How Norms, Interests, and Great Power Rivalries Affect U.S. Public Support for Partisan Electoral Interventions Abroad

Author

Listed:
  • Dov H. Levin
  • Paul Musgrave

Abstract

Foreign electoral interventions have attracted greater attention since the Russian intervention in the 2016 U.S. elections. Even though the United States has a long history of intervening in other countries’ elections, evidence about what drives public support for U.S. foreign electoral intervention is scarce. This paper uses a new set of surveys and experiments to test hypotheses about what drives the American public’s views of U.S. electoral interventions abroad. We find that there is no taboo against such U.S. interference in the American public. However, public support for U.S. election interference is not automatic. Respondents do not support interventions solely to advance U.S. interests or to protect democracy, although they prove more supportive of interventions on behalf of democratic parties that also favor U.S. interests or to protect longstanding democracies. Finally, support for an intervention rises when it is framed as responding to the actions of a great-power rival such as Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Dov H. Levin & Paul Musgrave, 2023. "The Meddling American Voter? How Norms, Interests, and Great Power Rivalries Affect U.S. Public Support for Partisan Electoral Interventions Abroad," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(5), pages 828-857, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:67:y:2023:i:5:p:828-857
    DOI: 10.1177/00220027221120374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220027221120374
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00220027221120374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thilo Bodenstein & Jörg Faust, 2017. "Who Cares? European Public Opinion on Foreign Aid and Political Conditionality," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 955-973, September.
    2. Justin H. Gross, 2015. "Testing What Matters (If You Must Test at All): A Context‐Driven Approach to Substantive and Statistical Significance," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3), pages 775-788, July.
    3. Baum, Matthew A. & Groeling, Tim, 2010. "Reality Asserts Itself: Public Opinion on Iraq and the Elasticity of Reality," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(3), pages 443-479, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert A. Jackson & Matthew Pietryka, 2022. "The influence of becoming a parent on political participation in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(3), pages 565-580, May.
    2. Maite D. Laméris & Richard Jong-A-Pin & Rasmus Wiese, 2018. "An Experimental Test of the Validity of Survey-Measured Political Ideology," CESifo Working Paper Series 7139, CESifo.
    3. Sarah Maxey, 2021. "Limited Spin: When the Public Punishes Leaders Who Lie about Military Action," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(2-3), pages 283-312, February.
    4. Benjamin T Jones & Eleonora Mattiacci, 2023. "How foreign information campaigns shape US public pronouncements about civil wars," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(5), pages 839-852, September.
    5. Michael C. Horowitz & Sarah Maxey, 2026. "Morally opposed? A theory of public attitudes and emerging military technologies," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(1), pages 58-80, January.
    6. Schneider, Sebastian H. & Eger, Jens & Bruder, Martin & Faust, Jörg & Wieler, Lothar H., 2021. "Does the COVID-19 pandemic threaten global solidarity? Evidence from Germany," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Andrew Kenealy, 2025. "The democratic patience," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(3), pages 675-689, May.
    8. Dara Kay Cohen & Connor Huff & Robert Schub, 2021. "At War and at Home: The Consequences of US Women Combat Casualties," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(4), pages 647-671, April.
    9. John Kuk & Deborah Seligsohn & Jiakun Jack Zhang, 2022. "The partisan divide in U.S. congressional communications after the China shock," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 494-526, July.
    10. Kelly Morrison, 2024. "Named and Shamed: International Advocacy and Public Support for Repressive Leaders," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 68(2-3), pages 294-321, March.
    11. McCaskey Kelly & Rainey Carlisle, 2015. "Substantive Importance and the Veil of Statistical Significance," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1-2), pages 77-96, December.
    12. Virginia Page Fortna, 2023. "Is Terrorism Really a Weapon of the Weak? Debunking the Conventional Wisdom," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(4), pages 642-671, April.
    13. Macario Rodríguez-Entrena & Florian Schuberth & Carsten Gelhard, 2018. "Assessing statistical differences between parameters estimates in Partial Least Squares path modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 57-69, January.
    14. Tomic, Slobodan & Rauh, William Jonathan, 2023. "How Political Culture Shapes Horizontal Accountability Outcomes: Evidence from 62 Countries," SocArXiv uf3nw, Center for Open Science.
    15. Strong, James, 2015. "Why parliament now decides on war: tracing the growth of the parliamentary prerogative through Syria, Libya and Iraq," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57325, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Benjamin Helms & Sonal S. Pandya & Rajkumar Venkatesan, 2025. "War on Aisle 5: Casualties, National Identity, and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 69(2-3), pages 434-462, March.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:uf3nw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Akisato Suzuki, 2023. "Uncertainty in grid data: a theory and comprehensive robustness test," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4477-4491, October.
    19. A. Burcu Bayram & Todd Shields, 2021. "Who Trusts the WHO? Heuristics and Americans’ Trust in the World Health Organization During the COVID‐19 Pandemic," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2312-2330, September.
    20. Marius Radean & Andreas Beger, 2025. "Not-so-average after all: Individual vs. aggregate effects in substantive research," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(7), pages 2408-2423, December.
    21. Christopher Gelpi, 2017. "Democracies in Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(9), pages 1925-1949, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:67:y:2023:i:5:p:828-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.