IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v43y2026i1p58-80.html

Morally opposed? A theory of public attitudes and emerging military technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Michael C. Horowitz

    (6572University of Pennsylvania)

  • Sarah Maxey

    (2456Loyola University Chicago)

Abstract

Military technology does not exist in a vacuum; it is mediated by difficult choices about development and use. Public attitudes influence these choices, but emerging technologies present a challenge: assessing public opinion without a clear picture of the technology's use. Focusing on autonomous weapon systems, we argue that attitude stability depends on moral conviction and concern with inherent characteristics or outcomes. Combining these dimensions into four reasoning categories creates a new framework for attitudes toward emerging technologies, validated with two Cooperative Congressional Election Study surveys. We find that moral conviction is prevalent, current opposition heterogeneous, and some attitudes depend on outcomes, especially civilian protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael C. Horowitz & Sarah Maxey, 2026. "Morally opposed? A theory of public attitudes and emerging military technologies," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(1), pages 58-80, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:58-80
    DOI: 10.1177/07388942251320027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942251320027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/07388942251320027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:58-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.