IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v22y1978i1p121-141.html

Equilibrium Payoff Configurations for Cooperative Games with Transferability

Author

Listed:
  • Chal Sussangkarn

    (University of California, Berkeley)

Abstract

This paper introduces some concepts of equilibrium payoff configurations for n-person games. They are based on the idea that a coalition must be sufficiently stable to break away from a particular payoff configuration and are extensions of the core and the bargaining sets The question of general existence is dealt with, as well as interesting dynamic properties in three-person games

Suggested Citation

  • Chal Sussangkarn, 1978. "Equilibrium Payoff Configurations for Cooperative Games with Transferability," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 121-141, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:22:y:1978:i:1:p:121-141
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277802200108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277802200108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277802200108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilson, Robert, 1971. "Stable coalition proposals in majority-rule voting," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 254-271, September.
    2. Morton Davis & Michael Maschler, 1965. "The kernel of a cooperative game," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 223-259, September.
    3. Charnes, A. & Littlechild, S. C., 1975. "On the formation of unions in n-person games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 386-402, June.
    4. Reinhard Selten & Klaus G. Schuster, 1968. "Psychological Variables and Coalition-Forming Behaviour," International Economic Association Series, in: Karl Borch & Jan Mossin (ed.), Risk and Uncertainty, chapter 0, pages 221-246, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. AUMANN, Robert J. & DREZE, Jacques H., 1974. "Cooperative games with coalition structures," LIDAM Reprints CORE 217, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. H. Andrew Michener & Daniel J. Myers, 1998. "Probabilistic Coalition Structure Theories," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 830-860, December.
    2. Michel Grabisch, 2013. "The core of games on ordered structures and graphs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 33-64, April.
    3. Armando Gomes, "undated". "A Theory of Negotiations and Formation of Coalitions," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 21-99, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    4. Funaki, Yukihiko & Núñez, Marina, 2024. "Some advances in cooperative game theory: Indivisibilities, externalities and axiomatic approach," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Michel Le Breton & Karine Van Der Straeten, 2017. "Alliances Électorales et Gouvernementales : La Contribution de la Théorie des Jeux Coopératifs à la Science Politique," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(4), pages 637-736.
    6. Montero, M.P., 2002. "Two-Stage Bargaining with Reversible Coalitions : The Case of Apex Games," Discussion Paper 2002-26, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Daniel Granot & Frieda Granot, 2021. "Consistent Allocation of Emission Responsibility in Fossil Fuel Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7637-7668, December.
    8. Elena M. Parilina & Alessandro Tampieri, 2018. "Stability and cooperative solution in stochastic games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 601-625, June.
    9. Robert P. Gilles & Lina Mallozzi, 2025. "Gately values of cooperative games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 79(3), pages 723-758, May.
    10. Grabisch, Michel & Sudhölter, Peter, 2018. "On a class of vertices of the core," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 541-557.
    11. Maria Montero & Alex Possajennikov, 2021. "An Adaptive Model of Demand Adjustment in Weighted Majority Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Xia Zhang & René van den Brink & Arantza Estévez-Fernández, 2025. "The Prekernel of Cooperative Games with $$\alpha $$ α -Excess," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 206(3), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Wenrong Lyu & Erfang Shan & Zeguang Cui, 2024. "Consistency of the Owen value for TU-games with coalition and graph structures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 991-1017, July.
    14. Bahel, Eric & Trudeau, Christian & Wang, Haoyu, 2026. "Preconvex games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 250-266.
    15. Zsófia Dornai & Miklós Pintér, 2025. "Characterizations of the $$\textbf{u}$$ u -prenucleolus by dually- $$\textbf{u}$$ u -essential coalitions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 349(3), pages 1575-1607, June.
    16. Calleja, Pedro & Llerena, Francesc & Sudhölter, Peter, 2019. "Welfare egalitarianism in surplus-sharing problems and convex games," Discussion Papers on Economics 6/2019, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    17. Pedro Calleja & Francesc Llerena & Peter Sudhölter, 2020. "Monotonicity and Weighted Prenucleoli: A Characterization Without Consistency," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 1056-1068, August.
    18. Alexander Karpov & Semyon Yurkov, 2012. "Generalized bankruptcy problem," HSE Working papers WP BRP 08/FE/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Wenzhong Li & Genjiu Xu & Hao Sun, 2020. "Maximizing the Minimal Satisfaction—Characterizations of Two Proportional Values," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Maria Montero & Martin Sefton & Ping Zhang, 2008. "Enlargement and the balance of power: an experimental study," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 30(1), pages 69-87, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:22:y:1978:i:1:p:121-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.