IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v16y2020i1p1550147719889808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hierarchical colored Petri net–based cyberattacks response strategy making approach for critical infrastructures

Author

Listed:
  • Qianxiang Zhu
  • Yuanqing Qin
  • Yue Zhao
  • Zhou Chunjie

Abstract

Critical infrastructures are essential for national security, economy, and public safety. As an important part of security protection, response strategy making provides useful countermeasures to reduce the impacts of cyberattacks. However, there have been few researches in this domain that investigate the cyberattack propagation within a station and the incident spreading process in the critical infrastructure network simultaneously, let along analyzing the relationships between security strategy making for a station and scheduling strategy for the critical infrastructure network. To tackle this problem, a hierarchical colored Petri net–based cyberattacks response strategy making approach for critical infrastructures is presented. In this approach, the relationships among cyberattacks, security measures, devices, functions, and station capacity are analyzed and described in a hierarchical way, and the system loss is calculated with the input of abnormal station capacities. Then, based on the above model, the security strategy making for a station and the scheduling strategy making for the critical infrastructure network are investigated in depth. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated on a simulated water supply system.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianxiang Zhu & Yuanqing Qin & Yue Zhao & Zhou Chunjie, 2020. "A hierarchical colored Petri net–based cyberattacks response strategy making approach for critical infrastructures," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(1), pages 15501477198, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:1550147719889808
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147719889808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147719889808
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147719889808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papa, Stephen & Casper, William & Moore, Tyler, 2013. "Securing wastewater facilities from accidental and intentional harm: A cost-benefit analysis," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 96-106.
    2. Beccuti, Marco & Chiaradonna, Silvano & Di Giandomenico, Felicita & Donatelli, Susanna & Dondossola, Giovanna & Franceschinis, Giuliana, 2012. "Quantification of dependencies between electrical and information infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 14-27.
    3. Zhenyu Yan & Yacov Y. Haimes, 2011. "Risk‐based multiobjective resource allocation in hierarchical systems with multiple decisionmakers. Part I: Theory and methodology," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Restrepo, Carlos E. & Simonoff, Jeffrey S. & Zimmerman, Rae, 2009. "Causes, cost consequences, and risk implications of accidents in US hazardous liquid pipeline infrastructure," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 38-50.
    5. Thacker, Scott & Pant, Raghav & Hall, Jim W., 2017. "System-of-systems formulation and disruption analysis for multi-scale critical national infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 30-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Abhishek Narain & Gupta, M.P. & Ojha, Amitabh, 2014. "Identifying critical infrastructure sectors and their dependencies: An Indian scenario," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 71-85.
    2. Liu, Kai & Wang, Ming & Zhu, Weihua & Wu, Jinshan & Yan, Xiaoyong, 2018. "Vulnerability analysis of an urban gas pipeline network considering pipeline-road dependency," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 79-89.
    3. Vaezi, Ali & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Railroad transportation of crude oil in Canada: Developing long-term forecasts, and evaluating the impact of proposed pipeline projects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 98-111.
    4. Siler-Evans, Kyle & Hanson, Alex & Sunday, Cecily & Leonard, Nathan & Tumminello, Michele, 2014. "Analysis of pipeline accidents in the United States from 1968 to 2009," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 257-269.
    5. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Moahamed Younes El Bouti & Mohamed Allouch, 2018. "Analysis of 801 Work-Related Incidents in the Oil and Gas Industry That Occurred Between 2014 and 2016 in 6 Regions," Energy and Environment Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 1-32, June.
    7. Zhang, Qiongfang & Xu, Nan & Ersoy, Daniel & Liu, Yongming, 2022. "Manifold-based Conditional Bayesian network for aging pipe yield strength estimation with non-destructive measurements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. Shengli, Liu & Yongtu, Liang, 2019. "Exploring the temporal structure of time series data for hazardous liquid pipeline incidents based on complex network theory," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    9. Rae Zimmerman, 2009. "Making Infrastructure Competitive in an Urban World," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 626(1), pages 226-241, November.
    10. Brunner, L.G. & Peer, R.A.M. & Zorn, C. & Paulik, R. & Logan, T.M., 2024. "Understanding cascading risks through real-world interdependent urban infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Mühlhofer, Evelyn & Koks, Elco E. & Kropf, Chahan M. & Sansavini, Giovanni & Bresch, David N., 2023. "A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. Liu, Shengli & Liang, Yongtu, 2021. "Statistics of catastrophic hazardous liquid pipeline accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Liu, Shuanglei & Li, Weijun & Gao, Peng & Sun, Yibo, 2022. "Modeling and performance analysis of gas leakage emergency disposal process in gas transmission station based on Stochastic Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Jasper Verschuur & Raghav Pant & Elco Koks & Jim Hall, 2022. "A systemic risk framework to improve the resilience of port and supply-chain networks to natural hazards," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 489-506, September.
    15. Ilalokhoin, Ohis & Pant, Raghav & Hall, Jim W., 2023. "A model and methodology for resilience assessment of interdependent rail networks – Case study of Great Britain's rail network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    16. Zhang, Kaimin & Bai, Libiao & Xie, Xiaoyan & Wang, Chenshuo, 2023. "Modeling of risk cascading propagation in project portfolio network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 612(C).
    17. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1204-1226, December.
    18. Federico Antonello & Piero Baraldi & Enrico Zio & Luigi Serio, 2022. "A novelty-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for identifying functional dependencies in complex technical infrastructures from alarm data," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 177-188, June.
    19. Johnson, Caroline A. & Flage, Roger & Guikema, Seth D., 2019. "Characterising the robustness of coupled power-law networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Edward J. Oughton & Will Usher & Peter Tyler & Jim W. Hall, 2018. "Infrastructure as a Complex Adaptive System," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:1550147719889808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.