IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v13y2017i6p1550147717715558.html

Reputation detection based on incomplete β distribution for mobile agent in wireless sensor networks

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Yang
  • Xiaoyu Jin
  • Su Yao
  • Xuesong Qiu
  • Liu Liu

Abstract

Mobile agent is a kind of program which can transfer via asynchronous mode independently in the sensor network with outstanding prospects in application. However, due to the openness of the sensor network, mobile agents are facing the threat of security, such as being stolen and modified. How to protect sensors from attacks of malicious mobile agents becomes an important issue in the field. Traditional access control strategies such as hybrid encryption mechanism, partial results of the package, and other methods have some defects in the application. We design a multisensor interaction trust model with complete β distribution and introduce incomplete β distribution to optimize the trust model according to the actual situation of detection data loss for mobile agent system in the wireless sensor networks. In addition, the introduction of the malicious behavior feedback mechanism ensures the security of sensors in the mobile agent system. The experimental results show that the reputation model of incomplete β distribution can simulate the actual situation well, resist the attacks of malicious agents, and ensure the security of sensors in the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Yang & Xiaoyu Jin & Su Yao & Xuesong Qiu & Liu Liu, 2017. "Reputation detection based on incomplete β distribution for mobile agent in wireless sensor networks," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 13(6), pages 15501477177, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:13:y:2017:i:6:p:1550147717715558
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147717715558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147717715558
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147717715558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Gerlach & Zudi Lu & Hai Huang, 2013. "Exponentially Smoothing the Skewed Laplace Distribution for Value‐at‐Risk Forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 534-550, September.
    2. Mohammadreza Rajabalinejad & Tew-Fik Mahdi, 2010. "The inclusive and simplified forms of Bayesian interpolation for general and monotonic models using Gaussian and Generalized Beta distributions with application to Monte Carlo simulations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(1), pages 29-49, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucas, André & Zhang, Xin, 2016. "Score-driven exponentially weighted moving averages and Value-at-Risk forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 293-302.
    2. Opschoor, Anne & Lucas, André, 2023. "Time-varying variance and skewness in realized volatility measures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 827-840.
    3. Berger, Theo & Gençay, Ramazan, 2018. "Improving daily Value-at-Risk forecasts: The relevance of short-run volatility for regulatory quality assessment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 30-46.
    4. Liu, Wei & Semeyutin, Artur & Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Gozgor, Giray, 2020. "Forecasting Value-at-Risk of Cryptocurrencies with RiskMetrics type models," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Mohammadreza Rajabalinejad & Zeki Demirbilek & Tewfik Mahdi, 2010. "Determination of failure probabilities of flood defence systems with improved dynamic bounds method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(1), pages 95-109, October.
    6. Lu Ou & Zhibiao Zhao, 2021. "Value‐at‐risk forecasting via dynamic asymmetric exponential power distributions," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 291-300, March.
    7. Thomas Hitchen & Saralees Nadarajah, 2025. "Modality and Limiting Behaviours of Skew Symmetric Distributions," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 87(1), pages 219-251, February.
    8. Jacinto Martín & M. Isabel Parra & Mario M. Pizarro & Eva L. Sanjuán, 2025. "A new Bayesian method for estimation of value at risk and conditional value at risk," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 1171-1189, March.
    9. Wang, Chuan-Sheng & Zhao, Zhibiao, 2016. "Conditional Value-at-Risk: Semiparametric estimation and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 86-103.
    10. Wen-Ko Hsu & Pei-Chiung Huang & Ching-Cheng Chang & Wei-Ling Chiang & Dung-Jiang Chiou & Cheng-Wu Chen, 2023. "Generation of artificial rainfall events for flood risk assessment in Taiwan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(3), pages 2235-2250, December.
    11. Geenens, Gery & Dunn, Richard, 2022. "A nonparametric copula approach to conditional Value-at-Risk," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 19-37.
    12. Nieto, Maria Rosa & Ruiz, Esther, 2016. "Frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 475-501.
    13. Owusu Junior, Peterson & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Tweneboah, George & Asafo-Adjei, Emmanuel, 2022. "GAS and GARCH based value-at-risk modeling of precious metals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Gery Geenens & Richard Dunn, 2017. "A nonparametric copula approach to conditional Value-at-Risk," Papers 1712.05527, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    15. Huang, Zhuo & Liang, Fang & Wang, Tianyi & Li, Chao, 2021. "Modeling dynamic higher moments of crude oil futures," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    16. Anne Opschoor & André Lucas, 2019. "Time-varying tail behavior for realized kernels," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-051/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    17. Wang, Tianyi & Liang, Fang & Huang, Zhuo & Yan, Hong, 2022. "Do realized higher moments have information content? - VaR forecasting based on the realized GARCH-RSRK model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Mohammadreza Rajabalinejad & Tewfik Mahdi & Pieter Gelder, 2010. "Stochastic methods for safety assessment of the flood defense system in the Scheldt Estuary of the Netherlands," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(1), pages 123-144, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:13:y:2017:i:6:p:1550147717715558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.