IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indpol/v4y2016i2p191-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disputed Waters: India, Pakistan and the Transboundary Rivers

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Ranjan

Abstract

Water disputes between India and Pakistan reflect the political relationship between the two countries since partition of British India in 1947. That partition broke the interdependent hydraulic system. In following decades, tensions between India and Pakistan have led to emergence of ‘water nationalism’ in both countries. In the past, many groups, in both countries, have made appeals to their respective government to scrap the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) of 1960, but no steps were taken in such direction by either of the two states. The IWT has survived two full wars (1965 and 1971), one limited war (1999) and a series of political-cum-military tensions (1987, 1989–90, 2002 and 2008) between India and Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Ranjan, 2016. "Disputed Waters: India, Pakistan and the Transboundary Rivers," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 4(2), pages 191-205, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:191-205
    DOI: 10.1177/2321023016665529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2321023016665529
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2321023016665529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grieco, Joseph M., 1988. "Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 485-507, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaplan Yilmaz, 2017. "China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 7-23, June.
    2. Michal Kolmas, 2016. "China’s Approach to Regional Cooperation," China Report, , vol. 52(3), pages 192-210, August.
    3. Andrea Gerlak & Jonathan Lautze & Mark Giordano, 2011. "Water resources data and information exchange in transboundary water treaties," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 179-199, May.
    4. Marc L. Busch & Eric R. Reinhardt, 1993. "Nice Strategies in a World of Relative Gains," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(3), pages 427-445, September.
    5. Shenkar Oded & Arikan Ilgaz, 2010. "Business as International Politics: Drawing Insights from Nation-State to Inter-Firm Alliances," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, January.
    6. David H. Bearce & Eric O'N. Fisher, 2002. "Economic Geography, Trade, and War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 365-393, June.
    7. Mark David Nieman, 2016. "Moments in time: Temporal patterns in the effect of democracy and trade on conflict," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 273-293, July.
    8. Nathan Jensen, 2007. "International institutions and market expectations: Stock price responses to the WTO ruling on the 2002 U.S. steel tariffs," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 261-280, September.
    9. Teng, Jimmy, 2012. "Military competition and size and composition of economy and government," MPRA Paper 37968, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Apr 2012.
    10. T. Clifton Morgan & Glenn Palmer, 2003. "To Protect and to Serve," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(2), pages 180-203, April.
    11. Xianbai Ji, 2017. "Promoting regional development bank complementarity: challenges to Asia and lessons from Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 261-281, September.
    12. Giovanni Pittaluga & Elena Seghezza, 2012. "Euro vs Dollar: An Improbable Threat," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 89-108, February.
    13. James S. Mosher, 2003. "Relative Gains Concerns when the Number of States in the International System Increases," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(5), pages 642-668, October.
    14. Osman Sabri Kiratli, 2012. "Greece," International Studies, , vol. 49(3-4), pages 263-284, July.
    15. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, 2020. "Death of international organizations. The organizational ecology of intergovernmental organizations, 1815–2015," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 339-370, April.
    16. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2021. "Foreign Influence and Domestic Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 426-487, June.
    17. Anton Gruber & Alexander Tekles & Lutz Bornmann, 2023. "John Mearsheimer’s academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist’s oeuvre," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 3867-3877, July.
    18. Mohammed Nuruzzaman, 2008. "Liberal Institutionalism and International Cooperation after 11 September 2001," International Studies, , vol. 45(3), pages 193-213, July.
    19. William Phelan, 2008. "Open International Markets without Exclusion: Encompassing Domestic Institutions, Excludable Goods, and International Public Goods," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp245, IIIS.
    20. David L. Rousseau & Rocio Garcia-Retamero, 2007. "Identity, Power, and Threat Perception," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(5), pages 744-771, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:191-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.