IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indgen/v23y2016i1p105-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Words, Ideas and Ideology in the Shifting Sand of Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Imrana Qadeer
  • Arathi P.M.

Abstract

The transformation of existing knowledge or production of new knowledge is the focus of this article. This theme is explored using women’s health, actions and perceptions, and their interpretations—within a public health perspective—as these evolve around the currently most talked about high-tech obstetric intervention—the practice of surrogacy. The interpretations of words such as production, reproduction, labour and work are central to the present understanding of surrogacy in different societies. At a point in time when social sciences are striving to understand complexities, interconnections and praxis, this article offers a possibility of judicious use of technology and a glimpse, however brief, of man’s natural essence—humanness—the cementing factor in the alternate structure of society waiting to overcome the present conflict between the global hegemonic and democratic forces. The article argues that in contemporary India, the sections where surrogates come from see surrogacy in different ways, and that has to be the starting point for analysis but not the end. Indian law-makers take advantage of this confusion about the nature of surrogacy. It buries the non-exploitative potential of procreation under the ‘compensation for agreeing’ to be a surrogate, denies her rights and undermines the value of gestational motherhood as compared to genetic identity—thus, killing several birds with one stone!

Suggested Citation

  • Imrana Qadeer & Arathi P.M., 2016. "Words, Ideas and Ideology in the Shifting Sand of Markets," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 23(1), pages 105-132, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:105-132
    DOI: 10.1177/0971521515612868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521515612868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971521515612868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beneria, Lourdes, 1979. "Reproduction, Production and the Sexual Division of Labour," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(3), pages 203-225, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rose Brewer & Cecilia Conrad & Mary King, 2002. "The Complexities and Potential of Theorizing Gender, Caste, Race, and Class," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 3-17.
    2. Cagatay, Nilüfer. & Ertürk, Korkuk., 2004. "Gender and globalization : a macroeconomic perspective," ILO Working Papers 993709743402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Marco, I. & Padró, R. & Tello, E., 2020. "Dialogues on nature, class and gender: Revisiting socio-ecological reproduction in past organic advanced agriculture (Sentmenat, Catalonia, 1850)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Schuenemann, Franziska & Msangi, Siwa & Zeller, Manfred, 2018. "Policies for a Sustainable Biomass Energy Sector in Malawi: Enhancing Energy and Food Security Simultaneously," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 14-26.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:246493 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tattwamasi Paltasingh & Lakshmi Lingam, 2014. "‘Production’ and ‘Reproduction’ in Feminism: Ideas, Perspectives and Concepts," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 3(1), pages 45-53, January.
    7. Rao, Smriti, 2021. "How (Not) To Count Indian Women’s Work: Gendered Analyses and the Periodic Labour Force Survey," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 11(2).
    8. Mampi Bose & Shantanu De Roy, 2019. "Conditions of Employment and Livelihood Security of Informal Workers: A Study of Four Villages in Jalpaiguri District, West Bengal," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 8(3), pages 414-439, December.
    9. Thilini N. K. Meegaswatta, 2021. "The Balancing Act: Employed Women Navigating the COVID-19 Lockdown in Sri Lanka," South Asian Survey, , vol. 28(1), pages 157-171, March.
    10. Wendy Olsen & University of Manchester, 2006. "Pluralist Methodology for Development Economics: The Example of Moral Economy of Indian Labour Markets," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-053, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    11. Vaughan M. & Chipande Ghr., 1986. "Women in the estate sector of Malawi: the tea and tobacco industries," ILO Working Papers 992464933402676, International Labour Organization.
    12. repec:ilo:ilowps:370974 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:pru:wpaper:39 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Rai, Shirin M. & Brown, Benjamin D. & Ruwanpura, Kanchana N., 2019. "SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – A gendered analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 368-380.
    15. Inamdar NIRAD, 2018. "A Segmentation-based Determination of Factors Influencing Women’s Labour Force Participation," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 12-21.
    16. Walters, Bernard, 1995. "Engendering macroeconomics: A reconsideration of growth theory," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 1869-1880, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:105-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.