IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v69y2016i5p1216-1248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Firms’ Phased Retirement Policies on the Labor Market Outcomes of Their Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Huber
  • Michael Lechner
  • Conny Wunsch

Abstract

In this article, the authors assess the impact on male employees’ labor market outcomes of firms offering a special form of phased retirement. The goal of the program is to smooth the transition from work to retirement and to decrease the costs of public pension and unemployment insurance schemes by increasing the employment of elderly workers. Using a unique linked employer-employee data set, the authors examine whether male employees spend more time in employment and less time in unemployment or inactivity after the introduction of the program. Results suggest that phased retirement options offered by firms can help to reduce some of the public costs of low labor force attachment of elderly workers, mainly by reducing exits through unemployment and by increasing employment and earnings. Under relatively good labor market conditions, they may also encourage a small share of workers to exit the labor market earlier.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Huber & Michael Lechner & Conny Wunsch, 2016. "The Effect of Firms’ Phased Retirement Policies on the Labor Market Outcomes of Their Employees," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 69(5), pages 1216-1248, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1216-1248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/69/5/1216.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:labeco:v:51:y:2018:i:c:p:247-270 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Songül Tolan, 2017. "The Effect of Partial Retirement on Labor Supply, Public Balances and the Income Distribution: Evidence from a Structural Analysis," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1679, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1216-1248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.