IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v48y1995i4p613-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National Union Effectiveness in Organizing: Measures and Influences

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Fiorito
  • Paul Jarley
  • John Thomas Delaney

Abstract

The percentage of the U.S. work force that is unionized is at its lowest level in more than 50 years. Although many studies have sought the reasons for this decline, few have investigated characteristics of unions themselves as possible factors. This paper focuses on unions as organizations, and applies a model of national union effectiveness to union organizing. The authors propose a composite measure of organizing effectiveness that goes beyond union success in representation elections. An analysis of data from the 1990 National Union Survey and other sources, with controls for environmental influences, suggests that organizing effectiveness is enhanced by innovation and reduced by centralization of control at the national level. Some evidence is also found that internal union democracy enhances union success in organizing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Fiorito & Paul Jarley & John Thomas Delaney, 1995. "National Union Effectiveness in Organizing: Measures and Influences," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 48(4), pages 613-635, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:48:y:1995:i:4:p:613-635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/48/4/613.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Willman, Paul & Bryson, Alex & Forth, John, 2016. "UK Trades Unions and the Problems of Collective Action," IZA Discussion Papers 10043, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Kevin F. Hallock & Felice B. Klein, 2016. "Executive Compensation in American Unions," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 219-234, April.
    3. Raymond Markey & Greg Patmore, 2011. "Employee Participation in Health and Safety in the Australian Steel Industry, 1935–2006," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 144-167, March.
    4. Robert Hickey & Sarosh Kuruvilla & Tashlin Lakhani, 2010. "No Panacea for Success: Member Activism, Organizing and Union Renewal," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 53-83, March.
    5. Donald Hatfield & Kent Murrmann, 1999. "Diversification and win rate in NLRB certification elections," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 539-554, December.
    6. Paul Willman & Alex Bryson & John Forth, 2020. "UK Unions, Collective Action and the Cost Disease," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 447-470, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:48:y:1995:i:4:p:613-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.