IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v11y2010i3p395-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EVA® Disclosures in the Annual Reports of Indian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Mandeep Kaur

    (Mandeep Kaur is Reader at the Department of Commerce and Business Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India. E-mail: mkaur02@yahoo.co.in)

  • Sweety Narang

    (Sweety Narang is Senior Research Scholar at the Department of Commerce and Business Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India. E-mail: sweety_narang2001@yahoo.co.in)

Abstract

Analyzing the annual reports of India’s largest 500 companies over a period of five years (from 2004 to 2008), the present study at first tries to examine the extent of Economic Value Added (EVA) reporting practices prevalent in Indian corporate sector. It reveals that just 37 companies (7.4 per cent of the sample) specifically mentioned the use of EVA metric in their public disclosures. The study also identifies the industry composition, preferred medium of EVA disclosure, areas of EVA applications and extent of EVA-related computations made and disclosed by the EVA reporting companies. The study finds that there exist significant inconsistencies and irregularities in the measurement of EVA and its major components by the EVA reporting companies. The second part of the study examines the corporate attributes that can be associated with the Indian companies’ EVA disclosure choices. Thus, the comparison of differences between the EVA reporting and EVA non-reporting companies on the basis of their background indicators and financial performance measures reveals that the EVA usage and disclosure choice of Indian companies is influenced by their size, profitability, leverage and sales efficiency. The study has implications for Securities and Exchange Board of India, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, Company Law Board and other related parties that they should recognize the need to make EVA reporting mandatory in Indian corporate sector. Through the establishment of separate accounting standards for EVA computations and disclosure and further linking it with the employees’ compensation plans, companies can reap benefits in terms of shareholder value enhancement.

Suggested Citation

  • Mandeep Kaur & Sweety Narang, 2010. "EVA® Disclosures in the Annual Reports of Indian Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 11(3), pages 395-420, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:11:y:2010:i:3:p:395-420
    DOI: 10.1177/097215091001100306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097215091001100306
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097215091001100306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Bennett Stewart, 2003. "How To Fix Accounting—Measure And Report Economic Profit," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 15(3), pages 63-82, March.
    2. Dulacha G. Barako & Phil Hancock & H. Y. Izan, 2006. "Factors Influencing Voluntary Corporate Disclosure by Kenyan Companies," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 107-125, March.
    3. Begoña Giner Inchausti, 1997. "The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 45-68, May.
    4. D V Ramana, 2007. "Economic Value Added and Other Accounting Performance Indicators: An Empirical Analysis of Indian Companies," The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 7-20, April.
    5. Mandeep Kaur & Sweety Narang, 2008. "Economic Value Added Reporting and Corporate Performance: A Study of Satyam Computer Services Ltd," The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 40-52, April.
    6. Young, David, 1997. "Economic value added: A primer for European managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 335-343, August.
    7. Jerold L. Zimmerman, 1997. "Eva And Divisional Performance Measurement: Capturing Synergies And Other Issues," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 10(2), pages 98-109, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faisal S. Alanezi & Mishari M. Alfraih & Saad S. Alshammari, 2016. "Operating Segments (IFRS 8)-Required Disclosure and the Specific-Characteristics of Kuwaiti Listed Companies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 136-153, January.
    2. Ripon Kumar Dey & Syed Zabid Hossain & Zabihollah Rezaee, 2018. "Financial Risk Disclosure and Financial Attributes among Publicly Traded Manufacturing Companies: Evidence from Bangladesh," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Stefano Fontana & Daniela Coluccia & Silvia Solimene, 2019. "VAIC as a Tool for Measuring Intangibles Value in Voluntary Multi-Stakeholder Disclosure," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1679-1699, December.
    4. Mahmoud Al‐Akra & Ian Eddie & Muhammad Ali, 2010. "The association between privatisation and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Jordan," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 55-74.
    5. Abdul Mansulu & Daniel Anarfi, 2019. "Discretionary Disclosure of Listed Non-Financial Firms in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Ghana," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(3), pages 823-837.
    6. Andrew Worthington & Tracey West, 2000. "A Review and Synthesis of the Economic Value-Added Literature," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 075, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    7. Noha Elberry & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "Governance Vis-à-Vis Investment Efficiency: Substitutes or Complementary in Their Effects on Disclosure Practice," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Rihab Grassa & Nejia Moumen & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "What drives risk disclosure in Islamic and conventional banks? An international comparison," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6338-6361, October.
    9. Kelly Anh Vu & Greg Tower & Glennda Scully, 2011. "Corporate communication for Vietnamese listed firms," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 125-146, July.
    10. Trang Cam Hoang & Indra Abeysekera & Shiguang Ma, 2018. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 833-852, September.
    11. Mishari M. Alfaraih & Faisal S. Alanezi, 2011. "Does Voluntary Disclosure Level Affect The Value Relevance Of Accounting Information?," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(2), pages 65-84.
    12. Maria Manuela Martins & Ana Isabel Morais & Helena Isidro & Raul Laureano, 2018. "Intellectual Capital Disclosure: the Portuguese Case," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(4), pages 1224-1245, December.
    13. Alberto Quagli & Elisa Roncagliolo & Gabriele D’Alauro, 2021. "The preparedness to adopt new accounting standards: a study of European companies on the pre-adoption phase of IFRS 15," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 290-303, September.
    14. Ahmadi Ali & Bouri Abdelfettah, 2019. "Financial Disclosure Information, Board of Directors, and Firm Characteristics among French CAC 40 Listed Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 941-957, September.
    15. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    16. Melinda Timea FÜLÖP & Mirela-Oana PINTEA, 2014. "Effects Of The New Regulation And Corporate Governance Of The Audit Profession," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 545-554, July.
    17. Anup Banerjee & Mattias Nordqvist & Karin Hellerstedt, 2020. "The role of the board chair—A literature review and suggestions for future research," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 372-405, November.
    18. Garcia-Meca, Emma & Martinez, Isabel, 2007. "The use of intellectual capital information in investment decisions: An empirical study using analyst reports," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 57-81.
    19. Drago, Carlo & Ginesti, Gianluca & Pongelli, Claudia & Sciascia, Salvatore, 2018. "Reporting strategies: What makes family firms beat around the bush? Family-related antecedents of annual report readability," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 142-150.
    20. Davide Giacomini & Paola Zola & Diego Paredi & Mario Mazzoleni, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1552-1564, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:11:y:2010:i:3:p:395-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.