IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v5y1981i3p377-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ethics of Evaluation Researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Sherri N. Sheinfeld

    (Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital Philadelphia)

  • Gary L. Lord

    (Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital Philadelphia)

Abstract

This exploratory study examines (1) the values of evaluation research practitioners in response to ethical statements demanding a value choice and (2) the relationship between evaluator value choices and five hypothetical value dimensions relevant to more mature groups of professionals. Preliminary findings indicate that scaling, comparison, and analysis of evaluator value choices are feasible and may identify whatever consensus exists. Value conflicts exist among evaluation practioners, particularly around more esoteric concepts such as sharing and client loyalty versus distributive justice. The implications of multiple value conflictsfor the further growth of evaluation as a profession are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherri N. Sheinfeld & Gary L. Lord, 1981. "The Ethics of Evaluation Researchers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 5(3), pages 377-391, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:5:y:1981:i:3:p:377-391
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8100500306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8100500306
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8100500306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Windle, Charles & Neigher, William, 1978. "Ethical problems in program evaluation: Advice for trapped evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 97-107, January.
    2. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    3. Sieber, Joan E. & Sanders, Nancy, 1978. "Ethical problems in program evaluation: Roles, not models," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 117-120, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Morris & Robin Cohn, 1993. "Program Evaluators and Ethical Challenges," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(6), pages 621-642, December.
    2. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    3. S. Hess & E. Suárez & J. Camacho & G. Ramírez & B. Hernández, 2001. "Reliability of Coordinates Obtained by MINISSA Concerning the Order of Presented Stimuli," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 117-128, May.
    4. Wedel, M. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1998. "Mixed Tree and Spatial Representation of Dissimilarity Judgments," Discussion Paper 1998-109, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Henk Kiers, 1991. "Hierarchical relations among three-way methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 449-470, September.
    6. Willem Kloot & Pieter Kroonenberg, 1985. "External analysis with three-mode principal component models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 479-494, December.
    7. Pietro Amenta & Antonio Lucadamo & Antonello D’Ambra, 2021. "Restricted Common Component and Specific Weight Analysis: A Constrained Explorative Approach for the Customer Satisfaction Evaluation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 409-427, August.
    8. Elizabeth Hellier & Kirsteen Aldrich & Daniel B. Wright & Denny Daunt & Judy Edworthy, 2007. "A Multi Dimensional Analysis of Warning Signal Words," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 323-338, April.
    9. Stegeman, Alwin & Ten Berge, Jos M.F., 2006. "Kruskal's condition for uniqueness in Candecomp/Parafac when ranks and k-ranks coincide," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 210-220, January.
    10. Elisa Frutos-Bernal & Ángel Martín del Rey & Irene Mariñas-Collado & María Teresa Santos-Martín, 2022. "An Analysis of Travel Patterns in Barcelona Metro Using Tucker3 Decomposition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Jad Beyhum & Eric Gautier, 2020. "Factor and factor loading augmented estimators for panel regression," Working Papers hal-02957008, HAL.
    12. Viet-Thi Tran & Mariam Mama Djima & Eugene Messou & Jocelyne Moisan & Jean-Pierre Grégoire & Didier K Ekouevi, 2018. "Avoidable workload of care for patients living with HIV infection in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    14. Rolf Langeheine, 1982. "Statistical evaluation of measures of fit in the Lingoes-Borg procrustean individual differences scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 427-442, December.
    15. Phipps Arabie & J. Carroll, 1980. "Mapclus: A mathematical programming approach to fitting the adclus model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 211-235, June.
    16. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    17. Serrano Cinca, C. & Mar Molinero, C. & Gallizo Larraz, J.L., 2005. "Country and size effects in financial ratios: A European perspective," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 26-47, August.
    18. Giuseppe Brandi & Ruggero Gramatica & Tiziana Di Matteo, 2019. "Unveil stock correlation via a new tensor-based decomposition method," Papers 1911.06126, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    19. Forrest Young & Yoshio Takane & Rostyslaw Lewyckyj, 1978. "Three notes on ALSCAL," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 433-435, September.
    20. Erick Armingol & Hratch M. Baghdassarian & Cameron Martino & Araceli Perez-Lopez & Caitlin Aamodt & Rob Knight & Nathan E. Lewis, 2022. "Context-aware deconvolution of cell–cell communication with Tensor-cell2cell," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:5:y:1981:i:3:p:377-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.