IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v1y1977i2p245-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participants' Understanding of the Treatment in Policy Experimentation

Author

Listed:
  • Walter Nicholson

    (Amherst College)

  • Sonia R. Wright

    (University of Massachusetts-Amherst)

Abstract

Participants' understanding of the treatment in social science experiments is raised as an issue in the specification of statistical models of policy evaluation. A statistical model is offered which shows that a failure to consider participants' understanding may intro duce biases of unknown direction into policy parametric estimates. Data from the New Jersey-Pennsylvania Negative Income Tax Experiment show that the negative income tax treatment was not well understood by the experimental participants, that under standing was correlated with experience and the treatment parameters themselves, and that the inclusion of "knowledge" variables in the labor supply equations used in the formal evaluation of the experiment changes some estimates of work disincentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter Nicholson & Sonia R. Wright, 1977. "Participants' Understanding of the Treatment in Policy Experimentation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 245-268, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:1:y:1977:i:2:p:245-268
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X7700100202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X7700100202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X7700100202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harold W. Watts & Robert Avery & David Elesh & David Horner & M. J. Lefcowitz & John Mamer & Dale Poirier & Seymour Spilerman & Sonia Wright, 1974. "The Labor-Supply Response of Husbands," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 9(2), pages 181-200.
    2. Metcalf, Charles E, 1973. "Making Inferences from Controlled Income Maintenance Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(3), pages 478-483, June.
    3. David Kershaw, "undated". "A Negative Income Tax Experiment," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 75baa942aabd4275a8cc2e8b8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Robinson G. Hollister, 1974. "The Labor-Supply Response of the Family," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 9(2), pages 223-252.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed SHARIF, 2000. "Inverted “S”—The complete neoclassical labour-supply function," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 139(4), pages 409-435, December.
    2. Kevin Devereux & Mona Balesh Abadi & Farah Omran, 2019. "Correcting for Transitory Effects in RCTs: Application to the RAND Health Insurance Experiment," Working Papers 201910, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    3. Frank Stafford, 1985. "Income-Maintenance Policy and Work Effort: Learning from Experiments and Labor-Market Studies," NBER Chapters, in: Social Experimentation, pages 95-144, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Imbens, G.W. & Rubin, D. & Sacerdote, B., 1999. "Estimating the effect of unearned income on labor supply, earnings, savings and consumption : Evidence from a survey of lottery players," Other publications TiSEM 43407245-d868-4cec-b289-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Saileshsingh Gunessee & Tom Lane, 2020. "Is Economics An Experimental Science? A Textbook Perspective," Discussion Papers 2020-16, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    6. Deaton, Angus & Cartwright, Nancy, 2018. "Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 2-21.
    7. Mona Balesh Abadi & Kevin Devereux & Farah Omran, 2023. "Correcting for transitory effects in RCTs: Evidence from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(1), pages 288-305, February.
    8. Donald T. Campbell & Robert F. Boruch & Richard D. Schwartz & Joseph Steinberg, 1977. "Confidentiality-Preserving Modes of Access To Files and To Interfile Exchange for Useful Statistical Analysis," Evaluation Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 269-300, May.
    9. Errol Meidinger & Allan Schnaiberg, 1980. "Social Impact Assessment as Evaluation Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 4(4), pages 507-535, August.
    10. repec:eee:labchp:v:1:y:1986:i:c:p:3-102 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Alisa C. Lewin & Eric Maurin, 2005. "The Effect of Family Size on Incentive Effects of Welfare Transfers in Two-Parent Families," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(6), pages 507-529, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:1:y:1977:i:2:p:245-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.