IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v19y1995i1p3-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Hierarchical Linear Modeling to Extended Longitudinal Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • D. Wayne Osgood

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Gail L. Smith

    (Father Flanagan's Boys' Home)

Abstract

Longitudinal research designs with many waves of data have the potential to provide a fine-grained description of program impact, so they should be of special value for evaluation research. This potential has been illusive because our principal analysis methods are poorly suited to the task. We present strategies for analyzing these designs using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The basic growth curve models found in most longitudinal applications of HLM are not well suited to program evaluation, so we develop more appropriate alternatives. Our approach defines well-focused parameters that yield meaningful effect-size estimates and significance tests, efficiently combining all waves of data available for each subject. These methods do not require a uniform set of observations from all respondents. The Boys Town Follow-Up Study, an exceptionally rich but complex data set, is used to illustrate our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Wayne Osgood & Gail L. Smith, 1995. "Applying Hierarchical Linear Modeling to Extended Longitudinal Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(1), pages 3-38, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:1:p:3-38
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9501900101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9501900101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9501900101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Heckman, 1989. "Causal Inference and Nonrandom Samples," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 14(2), pages 159-168, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thompson, Ronald W. & Smith, Gail L. & Osgood, D. Wayne & Dowd, Thomas P. & Friman, Patrick C. & Daly, Daniel L., 1996. "Residential care: A study of short- and long-term educational effects," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 221-242.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norman E. Breslow, 2003. "Are Statistical Contributions to Medicine Undervalued?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Mealli, Fabrizia & Rubin, Donald B., 2003. "Assumptions allowing the estimation of direct causal effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 79-87, January.
    3. Thompson, Ronald W. & Smith, Gail L. & Osgood, D. Wayne & Dowd, Thomas P. & Friman, Patrick C. & Daly, Daniel L., 1996. "Residential care: A study of short- and long-term educational effects," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 221-242.
    4. Lorenzo Guarcello & Fabrizia Mealli & Furio Rosati, 2010. "Household vulnerability and child labor: the effect of shocks, credit rationing, and insurance," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 169-198, January.
    5. Jian Li & Jinhui Xu, 2016. "Investigating Causality between Global Experience and Global Competency for Undergraduates in Contemporary China’s Higher Education: A Transformative Learning Theory Perspective," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 155-155, August.
    6. Braver, Sanford L. & Smith, Melanie C., 1996. "Maximizing both external and internal validity in longitudinal true experiments with voluntary treatments: The "combined modified" design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 287-300, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:1:p:3-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.