IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v35y2017i1p25-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land acquisition, rural protests, and the local state in China and India

Author

Listed:
  • Xuefei Ren

Abstract

As China and India urbanize, land acquisition by state and private actors has become highly contentious in both countries. This article compares two large-scale anti-land acquisition protests—the Wukan protest in China’s Guangdong province and the Singur protest in the Indian state of West Bengal—to examine how the subnational state partakes in land acquisition and how rural protesters engage with different levels of the state in their resistance. The comparative analysis finds that the different involvement of the subnational state in land speculation has produced different spatiality and dynamics of protests. In China, rural protesters target the bottom-level authority such as village councils, often taking on a cellular form of mobilization geographically confined to their particular villages. By comparison, in India rural protesters target the regional state governments and they engage in associational forms of mobilization by building ad hoc alliances with political parties and NGOs beyond the affected villages. Although the larger context of political regimes should be taken into account, this article shows that the scales at which the subnational state partakes in land acquisition have largely shaped the spatiality and strategies of rural protests.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuefei Ren, 2017. "Land acquisition, rural protests, and the local state in China and India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 25-41, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:25-41
    DOI: 10.1177/0263774X16655802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263774X16655802
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0263774X16655802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brenner, Neil, 2004. "New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199270064.
    2. Gavin Shatkin, 2014. "Contesting the Indian City: Global Visions and the Politics of the Local," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Maitreesh Ghatak & Parikshit Ghosh, 2011. "The Land Acquisition Bill-- A Critique and a Proposal," Working papers 204, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    4. Michael Levien, 2013. "The Politics of Dispossession," Politics & Society, , vol. 41(3), pages 351-394, September.
    5. Heather Plumridge Bedi & Louise Tillin, 2015. "Inter-state Competition, Land Conflicts and Resistance in India," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 194-211, June.
    6. Ghatak, Maitreesh & Mitra, Sandip & Mookherjee, Dilip & Nath, Anusha, 2013. "Land Acquisition and Compensation in Singur: What Really Happened?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 121, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    7. Jamie Peck, 2002. "Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations, and Neoliberal Workfare," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 331-360, July.
    8. Neil Brenner, 2009. "Open questions on state rescaling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 2(1), pages 123-139.
    9. Chakravorty, Sanjoy, 2013. "The Price of Land: Acquisition, Conflict, Consequence," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198089544.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinxia Zhu & Qian Xu & Yi Pan & Lefeng Qiu & Yi Peng & Haijun Bao, 2018. "Land-Acquisition and Resettlement (LAR) Conflicts: A Perspective of Spatial Injustice of Urban Public Resources Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikita Sud, 2017. "State, scale and networks in the liberalisation of India’s land," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 76-93, February.
    2. Loraine Kennedy, 2017. "State restructuring and emerging patterns of subnational policy-making and governance in China and India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 6-24, February.
    3. Mustafa Kemal Bayirbağ, 2013. "Continuity and Change in Public Policy: Redistribution, Exclusion and State Rescaling in Turkey," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1123-1146, July.
    4. Tak-Wing Ngo & Cunyi Yin & Zhilin Tang, 2017. "Scalar restructuring of the Chinese state: The subnational politics of development zones," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 57-75, February.
    5. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    6. Kevin Fox Gotham, 2014. "Racialization and Rescaling: Post-Katrina Rebuilding and the Louisiana Road Home Program," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 773-790, May.
    7. Jacob Salder, 2020. "Spaces of regional governance: A periodisation approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 1036-1054, September.
    8. Sreeparna Saha & Prabal Roy Chowdhury & Jaideep Roy & Prasad Bhattarcharya, 2016. "Political Economy of Land Acquisition and Holdout," Discussion Papers 16-07, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    9. Carol Upadhya, 2017. "Amaravati and the New Andhra," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 177-202, August.
    10. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    11. Rahel Nüssli & Christian Schmid, 2016. "Beyond the Urban–Suburban Divide: Urbanization and the Production of the Urban in Zurich North," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 679-701, May.
    12. Enrico Gualini & Carola Fricke, 2019. "‘Who governs’ Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic-relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin–Brandenburg’s economic development policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 59-80, February.
    13. Simon Pemberton & Janice Morphet, 2014. "The Rescaling of Economic Governance: Insights into the Transitional Territories of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2354-2370, August.
    14. Reimer, Mario, 2012. "Region als Experiment: Masterplanung zwischen Innovation und Ohnmacht - Das Beispiel der REGIONALE 2010," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Growe, Anna & Heider, Katharina & Lamker, Christian & Paßlick, Sandra & Terfrüchte, Thomas (ed.), Polyzentrale Stadtregionen - Die Region als planerischer Handlungsraum, volume 3, pages 43-55, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    15. Nitika Dhingra, 2022. "Political economy of law, efficiency and adverse ‘inclusion’: rethinking land acquisition in India," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 379-403, July.
    16. Xiaobo Su, 2012. "Transnational Regionalization and the Rescaling of the Chinese State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(6), pages 1327-1347, June.
    17. Jeroen Klink, 2013. "Development Regimes, Scales and State Spatial Restructuring: Change and Continuity in the Production of Urban Space in Metropolitan Rio de Janeiro, Brazil," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1168-1187, July.
    18. Alexander Nurse & Matthew Fulton, 2017. "Delivering strategic economic development in a time of urban austerity: European Union structural funds and the English city regions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 164-182, May.
    19. Matthew Cocks, 2016. "Urban entrepreneurialism, global networks and export support: Are UK cities looking east?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(6), pages 690-708, September.
    20. Dong-Wan Gimm, 2013. "Fracturing Hegemony: Regionalism and State Rescaling in South Korea, 1961–71," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1147-1167, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:25-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.