IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v34y2016i3p546-558.html

Measuring to manage: Reconfiguring people–water relations through water measurement standards and technologies in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Myles
  • Ronlyn Duncan
  • Ann Brower

Abstract

This paper presents a water management case study from New Zealand's South Island region of Canterbury. It examines how the introduction of standards and technologies to measure, monitor and manage the use of groundwater for agriculture has made visible new identities for farmers, not just water use. It finds that recently introduced measurement regulations have allowed farmers to confidently constitute themselves as rule followers and environmental protectors. Using a co-production analytical framework, this article illustrates how measurement standards have reconfigured the relations between people and water. Farmers subject to the new measurement practices and technologies have enrolled these technologies to contest dominant narratives and identities, such as rule breakers and resource squanderers, and deploy counter configurations in contests over resource allocation. In other words, this paper finds that standards can create new forms of political agency for the measured, not just the measurers.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Myles & Ronlyn Duncan & Ann Brower, 2016. "Measuring to manage: Reconfiguring people–water relations through water measurement standards and technologies in New Zealand," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(3), pages 546-558, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:3:p:546-558
    DOI: 10.1177/0263774X15614676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263774X15614676
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0263774X15614676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:iwt:bosers:h042460 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Molle, Francois & Wester, Philippus (ed.), 2009. "River basin trajectories: societies, environments and development," IWMI Books, International Water Management Institute, number 137953, January.
    3. repec:iwt:bosers:h042436 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:iwt:bosers:h042449 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Lennox, James & Proctor, Wendy & Russell, Shona, 2011. "Structuring stakeholder participation in New Zealand's water resource governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1381-1394, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Pascual Fernández Martínez & Amelia Pérez Zabaleta & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    2. Larson, Silva & Stoeckl, Natalie & Neil, Barbara & Welters, Riccardo, 2013. "Using resident perceptions of values associated with the Australian Tropical Rivers to identify policy and management priorities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 9-18.
    3. Lipari, Francesca & Lázaro-Touza, Lara & Escribano, Gonzalo & Sánchez, Ángel & Antonioni, Alberto, 2024. "When the design of climate policy meets public acceptance: An adaptive multiplex network model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Bell, Brian A. & Sinner, Jim & Phillips, Yvonne & Yap, Michael & Scarpa, Riccardo & Batstone, Chris & Marsh, Dan, 2012. "“Mixed signals: Stated preferences for future states of three New Zealand rivers”," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124234, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. J. Coleman & F. Sosa-Rodriguez & L. Mortsch & P. Deadman, 2016. "Assessing stakeholder impacts and adaptation to low water-levels: the Trent-Severn waterway," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 115-129, January.
    6. Rodríguez-Piñeros, Sandra & Martínez-Cortés, Oscar & Villarraga-Flórez, Liz & Ruíz-Díaz, Alejandra, 2018. "Timber market actors' values on forest legislation: A case study from Colombia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Martin Quinn & Theodore Lynn & Stephen Jollands & Binesh Nair, 2016. "Domestic Water Charges in Ireland - Issues and Challenges Conveyed through Social Media," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3577-3591, August.
    8. Linda Lilburne & Melissa Robson-Williams & Ned Norton, 2022. "Improving Understanding and Management of Uncertainty in Science-Informed Collaborative Policy Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Mika Marttunen & Jyri Mustajoki, 2018. "Use of Analyst-Generated Stakeholder Preference Profiles in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis — Experiences from an Urban Planning Case," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-29, September.
    10. Ki Woong Cho & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "From Collaborative to Hegemonic Water Resource Governance through Dualism and Jeong : Lessons Learned from the Daegu-Gumi Water Intake Source Conflict in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Fabien Martinez, 2015. "A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Framework of Corporate Water Responsibility," Post-Print hal-02887624, HAL.
    12. Alex Y Lo & Kim S Alexander & Wendy Proctor & Anthony Ryan, 2013. "Reciprocity as Deliberative Capacity: Lessons from a Citizen's Deliberation on Carbon Pricing Mechanisms in Australia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 444-459, June.
    13. Massarutto, Antonio & Troiano, Stefania, 2025. "Maintaining water service quality in the face of climate change: Can stated-preference analysis support priority setting?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    14. Ahmet Conker & Hussam Hussein, 2019. "Hydraulic Mission at Home, Hydraulic Mission abroad? Examining Turkey’s Regional ‘Pax-Aquarum’ and Its Limits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Lo, Alex Y., 2013. "Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: Reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 84-94.
    16. J. M. A. Coleman & F. S. Sosa-Rodriguez & L. D. Mortsch & P. J. Deadman, 2016. "Assessing stakeholder impacts and adaptation to low water-levels: the Trent-Severn waterway," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 115-129, January.
    17. Armatas, Christopher A. & Venn, Tyron J. & Watson, Alan E., 2014. "Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 447-456.
    18. Bebbington, Jan & Russell, Shona & Thomson, Ian, 2017. "Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-34.
    19. Valerie Rountree & Elizabeth Baldwin & Jeffrey Hanlon, 2022. "A review of stakeholder participation studies in renewable electricity and water: does the resource context matter?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 232-247, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:3:p:546-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.