IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v17y1999i2p211-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transport Investment and Urban Regeneration in a Provincial City: Sheffield, 1992–96

Author

Listed:
  • P Lawless

    (Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Pond Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, England)

Abstract

The author examines the relationship between transport investment and urban regeneration in an English provincial city. On the whole transport objectives and policy initiatives have not been addressed, in urban policy effected by successive governments since 1977. In part as a consequence, there has been a marked dearth of empirically based intraurban research in which that nexus between transport infrastructure and social and economic renewal has been explored. In the early 1990s, Sheffield proved to be an especially interesting laboratory within which to examine this issue because of the construction of a new light rail-transit system, the South Yorkshire Supertram (SYS), and a substantial programme of new and improved roads. During the period 1992 to 1996, the research team undertook ‘before-and-after’ surveys of the effects of the SYS and enhanced road provision on five elements of urban regeneration: image, property values, land use, business (relocation, and labour mobility. New investment had only a relatively limited impact on regeneration and, where effects could be identified, enhanced road investment proved significantly more beneficial than did the SYS. However, the policy environment within which the SYS was implemented was never likely to maximise regeneration, primarily because of the lack of integration across regeneration agencies and transport providers.

Suggested Citation

  • P Lawless, 1999. "Transport Investment and Urban Regeneration in a Provincial City: Sheffield, 1992–96," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(2), pages 211-226, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:211-226
    DOI: 10.1068/c170211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c170211
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c170211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel W. Immergluck, 1993. "The Role of Public Infrastructure in Urban Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 7(3), pages 310-318, August.
    2. B J Linneker & N A Spence, 1992. "Accessibility Measures Compared in an Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(8), pages 1137-1154, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D. Knowles, Richard & Ferbrache, Fiona, 2016. "Evaluation of wider economic impacts of light rail investment on cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 430-439.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Lawless & Tony Gore, 1999. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Case Study of Sheffield 1992-96," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 527-545, March.
    2. P Lawless & G Dabinett, 1995. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(7), pages 1029-1048, July.
    3. Dabinett, G. & Gore, T. & Haywood, R. & Lawless, P., 1999. "Transport investment and regeneration. Sheffield: 1992-1997," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 123-134, April.
    4. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    5. Han, Feng & Ke, Shanzi, 2016. "The effects of factor proximity and market potential on urban manufacturing output," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 31-45.
    6. Bocarejo S., Juan Pablo & Oviedo H., Daniel Ricardo, 2012. "Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 142-154.
    7. Weber, Joe, 2017. "Continuity and change in American urban freeway networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 31-39.
    8. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Aurélie Mercier, 2013. "A combined people-freight accessibility approach for urban retailing and leisure planning at strategic level," Post-Print halshs-00919537, HAL.
    9. Wong, Sandy, 2018. "The limitations of using activity space measurements for representing the mobilities of individuals with visual impairment: A mixed methods case study in the San Francisco Bay Area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 300-308.
    10. Áron Kovács & András Bozóti & Zsuzsanna Pótó & Márta Bakucz, 2014. "Medicinal and Thermal Spas in South and West Transdanubia - The Significance of Accessibility," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 81-98, October.
    11. Chandra, Shailesh & Naik, R. Thirumaleswara & Venkatesh, Manoj & Mudgal, Abhisek, 2021. "Accessibility evaluations of the proposed road user charge (RUC) program in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 12-26.
    12. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Ribeiro, Anabela & Antunes, António Pais & Páez, Antonio, 2010. "Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: Empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 125-132.
    14. J Gutiérrez & A Monzón & J M Piñero, 1998. "Accessibility, Network Efficiency, and Transport Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(8), pages 1337-1350, August.
    15. Páez, Antonio & Anjum, Zoha & Dickson-Anderson, Sarah E. & Schuster-Wallace, Corinne J. & Martín Ramos, Belén & Higgins, Christopher D., 2020. "Comparing distance, time, and metabolic energy cost functions for walking accessibility in infrastructure-poor regions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Gutiérrez, Javier & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2011. "Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 185-203, March.
    17. Suxia Liu & Xuan Zhu, 2004. "Accessibility Analyst: An Integrated GIS Tool for Accessibility Analysis in Urban Transportation Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(1), pages 105-124, February.
    18. Gutiérrez, Javier & Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Martín, Juan Carlos, 2010. "Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 141-152.
    19. T Karst & Jan R Ritsema van Eck, 2003. "Evaluation of Accessibility Impacts of Land-Use Scenarios: The Implications of Job Competition, Land-Use, and Infrastructure Developments for the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(1), pages 69-87, February.
    20. Marek Ogryzek & Daria Adamska-Kmieć & Anna Klimach, 2020. "Sustainable Transport: An Efficient Transportation Network—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:211-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.